SEC scheduling is starting to come info focus per inside sources ...

WhosYourDawggy

WhosYourDawggy

Joined
Aug 19, 2020
Posts
8,607
Reaction score
6,965
Bookie:
$ 1,000.00
Many people are starting to get inside info on the SEC schedule. Satan tipped his hit when he came out complaining about Bama's 3 teams - justified in my opinion, but fuck you Satan.

A few are listed below:

Only focusing on the top 7 teams:
- Bama toughest.
- UTjr easiest.
- Love UGA getting UK instead of USCjr. Ky in October is awesome.
- UF and OU just seems odd.





FqULgLdXoA4phqc
 
Why would Tennessee get South Carolina and not Kentucky?

I don't trust On3.

They said FSU could get by their "legal" issues yesterday and join the SEC in this video:

 
Volbound1700 said:
Why would Tennessee get South Carolina and not Kentucky?

I don't trust On3.

They said FSU could get by their "legal" issues yesterday and join the SEC in this video:

Click to expand...

Dude I told you months ago there was no way you were going to keep both Vandy and Kentucky and you lost your shit and told me I didn't know what I was talking about.

Feel free to tell me I was right and will only hurt a little bit.
 
Overall I say they got it right. There wasn't a perfect solution and this is about as good as you can get.

Auburn is right where I expected them to be with Vandy or I thought maybe SC.
Love that Alabama is getting loaded up because it's about time after they had Vandy as one of their two Eastern permanent opponents for over a decade claiming it was a "rivalry game". Auburn played Georgia and Florida every year during that time.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
Many people are starting to get inside info on the SEC schedule. Satan tipped his hit when he came out complaining about Bama's 3 teams - justified in my opinion, but fuck you Satan.

A few are listed below:

Only focusing on the top 7 teams:
- Bama toughest.
- UTjr easiest.
- Love UGA getting UK instead of USCjr. Ky in October is awesome.
- UF and OU just seems odd.





FqULgLdXoA4phqc
Click to expand...

They threw OU a bone to give them an inlet to Florida recruiting ground in exchange for them taking Missouri (who no one wants).

@outofyourmind I think it's pretty fair to take Mizzou in exchange for a guaranteed game against the Gators and to be able to play in front of those recruits every other year and be able to bring them up the other years. You just got an inroad to some of the richest recruiting grounds in the country.
 
A&M fans on suicide alert
 
Wild Turkey said:
Dude I told you months ago there was no way you were going to keep both Vandy and Kentucky and you lost your shit and told me I didn't know what I was talking about.

Feel free to tell me I was right and will only hurt a little bit.
Click to expand...

South Carolina is odd. I would expect Florida if we did NOT keep Kentucky. Not South Carolina.

I will believe it when I see it but I would think historically, Tennessee should have Kentucky, Florida, Georgia, Auburn, and Ole Miss before South Carolina.

@Wild Turkey if you makes you feel good, I will say you are right although I don't think South Carolina is really that much tougher than Kentucky. To me, it is about the historical connections. If we don't get UK (the most played series we currently have), give us Florida.
 
Last edited:
Wild Turkey said:
@outofyourmind I think it's pretty fair to take Mizzou in exchange for a guaranteed game against the Gators and to be able to play in front of those recruits every other year and be able to bring them up the other years. You just got an inroad to some of the richest recruiting grounds in the country.
Click to expand...
Fuck Missouri
 
Wild Turkey said:
They threw OU a bone to give them an inlet to Florida recruiting ground in exchange for them taking Missouri (who no one wants).

@outofyourmind I think it's pretty fair to take Mizzou in exchange for a guaranteed game against the Gators and to be able to play in front of those recruits every other year and be able to bring them up the other years. You just got an inroad to some of the richest recruiting grounds in the country.
Click to expand...
I really am agnostic on the OU v. UF thing other than distance. I think part of the process was to try and have the 3 permanent fairly close geographically to drive up the intensity. But, having UF and OU play every year is cool.
 
Alabama has played Auburn, Tennessee and L.S.U. every year my entire life, so not a big deal really.
 
Blackshirts BLVD said:
FqTXOgiXsAIgx8O
Click to expand...

...because historically they're Bama's three most competitive rivals? Yeah there's Ole Miss and Miss State, but both of those rivalries have been lopsided (plus they've played Ole Miss less than Auburn/Tenn/LSU). They don't play UGA or Florida every year.

guess SOS didn't matter to Saban when Tennessee was bad for about 15 years. not to mention Auburn has constantly fluctuated from playoff caliber to mediocre.
 
Last edited:
So we have to assume this means a 9 game conference schedule right? This makes it clean, play your 3 every year and everyone else every other year.
 
What if sec just went pods...

West - ou Texas mizzou atm
Gulf - ark lsu olemiss msu
South - UK tenn auburn bama
East - vandy uf uga usc
 
tabascojet said:
What if sec just went pods...

West - ou Texas mizzou atm
Gulf - ark lsu olemiss msu
South - UK tenn auburn bama
East - vandy uf uga usc
Click to expand...
PODS haven't been discussed for well over a year. The ACC has already implemented the permanent rival concept, and it's clear the SEC and the B1G will soon do the same.
 
If this is accurate I actually think they did a very good job with this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top