Pac12 expansion - looking to add 4 teams

ralphiewvu said:
I asked a question for PACs expansion in a.......PAC 12 expansion thread you blithering retard.
Click to expand...
You didn’t ask a question about Pac 12 expansion. You replied to a specific post about Washington State and its natural rivals that will be in the conference and an old school rival who is a FCS team
 
ralphiewvu said:
The only person making stuff up is you dummie. Remember when you said I said Wyoming and UNM are "natural rivals" to your team???

Look at the title of this thread. Thats why I asked about Wyoming and UNM. Maybe next time instead of being some miserable prick, just answer my fucking question.

Hope those words weren't too big for you.
Click to expand...
I answered your question, it isn’t my fault that you don’t like the answer and have embarrassed yourself for the rest of this thread.
 
I just stopped by to see why this thread is approaching 600 posts.


Backing Up Homer Simpson GIF
 
ericd7633 said:
Yeah man I know it's a thread on P12 expansion. But the specific post you replied to mentioned nothing about adding a team from the conference's perspective. In fact, there were 3 instances in the post that directly reference Washington State.

It's fine if you misinterpreted what he meant. And then again in his post abot "not a rival". I'm only taking his side because it's the correct one in this instance. I didn't take his side when he said UNLV was in the best position in conference realignment history or however you said it.

Again it's okay if you misinterpreted what he meant.
Click to expand...
I stand by that UNLV statement. They got a signing bonus to stay in the conference. Just think of that compared to the current ACC situation and Texas when the most of the Big 12 South had its bags packed for the Pac 10. Long term, no that is silly, but ATM they were the only team that I can recall that had 2 conferences offering stupid money to them.
 
ralphiewvu said:
Understand Utah and the Arizona’s didn’t want to come to the B12. They did it out of panic because the PAC/remaining teams had ZERO plan. If CalFord comes out and says “let’s rebuild” and do it like this…they may have stayed. Which is my whole argument here.

It truly is amazing how you continue to show your retardation.

vintage baby GIF
Click to expand...
Stanford and Cal did say they were going to stay and rebuild with the Pac 4.
 
ralphiewvu said:
I literally thought he was alluding to only rivals have been added. Because in a thread about PAC EXPANSION I suggested two adds that (as you have agreed) are way better then his suggestion. All the while it being pretty freaking obvious neither of the teams I asked about are WSU rivals.

It is what it is.
Click to expand...
So let’s do a simple story problem. When a person says WE, mentions Saturday when only one Pac 12 team played plus the day that Gonzaga was added to the conference, plus Idaho, plus natural rivals which school is the post about. If you couldn’t figure it out you could’ve asked Alexa, Siri or pull out and old school map.
 
ericd7633 said:
But it wouldn't have. Once UW and Oregon decided to leave, on top of Colorado, Utah, ASU and Arizona were right behind. If Oregon and Washington would have committed that would have been one thing. Stanford and Cal making a statement wouldn't have changed anything. There's also the whole timeline of events. 6 schools left within a span of 4 days.
Click to expand...
LA left first, then Colorado, then UOUW then the rest of the 4 corners in that order.
 
People kept trying to make UCONN to the Pac happen but I saw Creighton as an idea that i like way more. closer connected to Colorado. but still only helps the BBall side
 
wazzu31 said:
I stand by that UNLV statement. They got a signing bonus to stay in the conference. Just think of that compared to the current ACC situation and Texas when the most of the Big 12 South had its bags packed for the Pac 10. Long term, no that is silly, but ATM they were the only team that I can recall that had 2 conferences offering stupid money to them.
Click to expand...

Agreed, they were certainly in an advantageous position. And will make out very good. I was just thinking if ND ever wanted to join a conference, their position would be pretty ideal. So while I wouldn't say it's the best of all-time or however you phrased it, they did do very well for themselves.
 
Hu War Yu said:
Just curious, did anybody call you out for this? Cause if they did, I won't bother,...
Click to expand...
I'm waiting till all 3 of my predictions become reality. But I do love you for mentioning this.
 
wazzu31 said:
You need a dictionary dude
Click to expand...
lol

So delusional
wazzu31 said:
You didn’t ask a question about Pac 12 expansion. You replied to a specific post about Washington State and its natural rivals that will be in the conference and an old school rival who is a FCS team
Click to expand...
I 100% asked a question about PAC expansion. Do you really think I believed Wyoming and UNM were some sort of rival to WSU??? It was your latest post at the time, that’s why I quoted it.
wazzu31 said:
I answered your question, it isn’t my fault that you don’t like the answer and have embarrassed yourself for the rest of this thread.
Click to expand...
You didn’t, you gave some half cocked dumbass response for WSU.
wazzu31 said:
So let’s do a simple story problem. When a person says WE, mentions Saturday when only one Pac 12 team played plus the day that Gonzaga was added to the conference, plus Idaho, plus natural rivals which school is the post about. If you couldn’t figure it out you could’ve asked Alexa, Siri or pull out and old school map.
Click to expand...
This was never in question. My question was about the PAC adding folks, not just WSU.
 
Hu War Yu said:
Just curious, but did anyone call you out for this? Because if they did...
Click to expand...
Takes balls to make predictions and you clearly don't have the cajones.

Don't be a pussy. Man up.
 
wazzu31 said:
Stanford and Cal did say they were going to stay and rebuild with the Pac 4.
Click to expand...
When did this happen? Not saying you are wrong I'm curiously asking. And yes, I know they aren't WSU rivals :dhd:
 
ericd7633 said:
Agreed, they were certainly in an advantageous position. And will make out very good. I was just thinking if ND ever wanted to join a conference, their position would be pretty ideal. So while I wouldn't say it's the best of all-time or however you phrased it, they did do very well for themselves.
Click to expand...
In my lifetime it doesn’t seem like ND has been interested in my life time which is why I say UNLV has the top spot because two conferences were throwing money at them. If ND ever makes that decision then for sure Notre Dame. I was just speaking in the history of college football until now.
 
OlyDuck said:
People kept trying to make UCONN to the Pac happen but I saw Creighton as an idea that i like way more. closer connected to Colorado. but still only helps the BBall side
Click to expand...
I’m sure I’ve posted this before but UConn is being talked about as an option if the Pac 12 works with the Big East. Not sure if Gould has been in talks but some representative from the Pac 12 has talked to whoever in the Big East. UConn needs a place for football and any AAC school who would be football members only need a place to put their Olympic sports.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top