Texas and Oklahoma to the SEC

[78Cyclones]

Bummer indeed however ISU certainly has a great chance this year to return to a major bowl game. Great team ya’s have coming back.

I'm looking forward to the season!

 

[ralphiewvu]

Networks aren't going to pay for a product no one watches.

Again, learn how networks pay rights to conferences for football and then you can look
Less stupid.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

Again, learn how networks pay rights to conferences for football and then you can look
Less stupid.

According to you the ACC should be commanding the biggest network contract, since it has the highest population base.

If no one is going to watch the product, the networks are going to pay less money.

Try learning anything about the media industry so you can avoid looking as stupid as you do now.

 

[ralphiewvu]

According to you the ACC should be commanding the biggest network contract, since it has the highest population base.

If no one is going to watch the product, the networks are going to pay less money.

Try learning anything about the media industry so you can avoid looking as stupid as you do now.

So the B1G adding Rutgers and Maryland did not help at all with them currently making the highest tier 1 money.

Again, learn how the networks pay tier 1 for football out to conferences before continuing to display your stupidity any further.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

So the B1G adding Rutgers and Maryland did not help at all with them currently making the highest tier 1 money.

Again, learn how the networks pay tier 1 for football out to conferences before continuing to display your stupidity any further.

Rutgers/Maryland made sense for the Big Ten's Tier 3 distribution model. It has had little impact on their Tier 1 negotiations.

Again, learn how the networks pay tier 1 for football before continuing to display your stupidity.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Rutgers/Maryland made sense for the Big Ten's Tier 3 distribution model. It has had little impact on their Tier 1 negotiations.

Again, learn how the networks pay tier 1 for football before continuing to display your stupidity.

The ACC has over 1/2 it’s conference in 3 states.

Rutgers/Maryland we’re brought in to deliver the NY and DC markets. Learn how networks payout tier 1 for football or continue to display your stupidity.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

The ACC has over 1/2 it’s conference in 3 states.

Rutgers/Maryland we’re brought in to deliver the NY and DC markets. Learn how networks payout tier 1 for football or continue to display your stupidity.

And they did. For the BigTen Network. None of that has anything to do with Tier 1 rights.

Learn how networks payout tier 1 for football or continue to display your stupidity.

 

[ralphiewvu]

And they did. For the BigTen Network. None of that has anything to do with Tier 1 rights.

Learn how networks payout tier 1 for football or continue to display your stupidity.

Which is exactly why the PAC should consider TCU and Kansas. Their markets or perceived markets which providers will charge no matter if someone watches them or not.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

Which is exactly why the PAC should consider TCU and Kansas. Their markets or perceived markets which providers will charge no matter if someone watches them or not.

The perceived market for TCU/Kansas football is miniscule.

 

[ralphiewvu]

The perceived market for TCU/Kansas football is miniscule.

Dallas FortWorth, where TCU is located is the #5 television market in the US. It’s bigger then anything you have save the LA market.

KC is smaller at 34 put is still a good add.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

Dallas FortWorth, where TCU is located is the #5 television market in the US. It’s bigger then anything you have save the LA market.

KC is smaller at 34 put is still a good add.

Which would be great if TCU was the #1 team in the Dallas/Ft. Worth market.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Which would be great if TCU was the #1 team in the Dallas/Ft. Worth market.

Again, that doesn’t matter when the provider is charging customers for it whether they watch it or not. It’s the exact reason the B1G brought in Rutgers and Maryland.

 

[TechRaiderRider]

That is your left coast biased opinion. I'm not saying they are major-major players like OU and Texas, but most teams are not. They are as good or better of a draw than MOST of the current Pac-12 though - especially East of the Rockies. Quite a few eyeballs watched Iowa State beat Oregon in the Fiesta Bowl.

tech already has a home n home
scheduled with oregon -
games like this,
and when/if the trojans come to town
that'll draw a bit of attention -

guns up!

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

Again, that doesn’t matter when the provider is charging customers for it whether they watch it or not. It’s the exact reason the B1G brought in Rutgers and Maryland.

Again, you are talking about the conference network.

If you can show that Disney charged providers significantly in those markets after they were added to the BigTen, I welcome you to do it.

 

[ralphiewvu]

Again, you are talking about the conference network.

If you can show that Disney charged providers significantly in those markets after they were added to the BigTen, I welcome you to do it.

I’m talking about adding a market that even if no one watches, the cable provider still charges and it’s available. Both Maryland and New Jersey carry the BIG network. Both didn’t before this. More importantly both DC and NYC do too. You think they added it for free?

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

I’m talking about adding a market that even if no one watches, the cable provider still charges and it’s available. Both Maryland and New Jersey carry the BIG network. Both didn’t before this. More importantly both DC and NYC do too. You think they added it for free?

So now, after bitching about Tier 1 rights this whole time, you are going to switch to Tier 3 with the BigTen network?

 

[ralphiewvu]

So now, after bitching about Tier 1 rights this whole time, you are going to switch to Tier 3 with the BigTen network?

You still seem to not understand how A) TCU is in a big market B) that big market provider can charge people for it even if they never watch it.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

You still seem to not understand how A) TCU is in a big market B) that big market provider can charge people for it even if they never watch it.

Are you going to talk about Tier 1 (ESPN/FOX) or Tier 3 (BigTen Network)? You're jumping from Tier to Tier whenever it suits you. Stick to one and be done with it.

 

[Red_Alert]

Again, you are talking about the conference network.

If you can show that Disney charged providers significantly in those markets after they were added to the BigTen, I welcome you to do it.

BTN's revenue is 35% of it's total revenue. That's a sizeable chunk.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

BTN's revenue is 35% of it's total revenue. That's a sizeable chunk.

No doubt. It's still the Tier 3, which now @ralphiewvu wants to claim is Tier 1.