Post here if your team has only one loss and is unranked

Both A&M and UNLV have 122 pts.

Notice A&M is absent from 'Others Receiving Votes'.
At 122 points they'd be first in 'Others receiving Votes'.

Whomever posted that from the AP is probably a DEI hire.
As I said, according to the AP themselves there is only one 25th place team and they picked the undefeated team to be there. There is no mention of Texas A&M on the AP week 6 site, I provided the link. Not sure what else you want from me.

That's why I posted in here with a disappearing/half there gif.
 
Even funnier when I won't be allowed to post in my own thread after next week. We play 4 ranked teams in a row -- and then a possibly ranked Vanderbilt before another ranked Mizzou.
Incredulous Bill Murray GIF by reactionseditor
 
Pitt didn’t count.
 
Rutgers is undefeated and unranked with wins over two power conference does. The Rutgers fans on this site need to start a post bitching.
 
What, you think Missouri won't be ranked by then? Very possible, very possible
Oh I hope they are....just comparing your SOS to ours. Somewhat similar.

Still on our sched are the #1, 2, 9, 12, and 13 teams and yall could be ranked by the time we play.

Yall: #1, 8, 12, 15, 19 & 25
 
Rutgers is undefeated and unranked with wins over two power conference does. The Rutgers fans on this site need to start a post bitching.

Washington looks better than their record. Rogers has been quite efficient and Coleman's given them an explosive running game. They're averaging 7.2 yards per play on the season, though the scoring has been underwhelming. They've only turned it over 2 times this year, they've just shot themselves in the foot a lot with penalties, not great kicking (3 missed FG against Rutgers), and poor performance on 3rd downs. Rutgers were outgained by over 200 yards and had a 3.3% win expectancy, but pulled off the win. Washington's defense has quietly been good, opposing offenses be damned (3 opponents held to under 10 points, 4.1 yards per play on the season). This was a nice win for Rutgers. Defense looks good again, though they've struggled against the run (5.2 YPC) and while their secondary is good (giving up under 6 Y/A and opponents are completing under 58% of their passes), their DL has struggled to register sacks. I like their running game and they've finally got a passing game that can occasionally threaten.

The schedule still looks favorable, the only games I'd expect them to lose are @Nebraska and @USC. I think 9 wins is very obtainable.
 
Washington looks better than their record. Rogers has been quite efficient and Coleman's given them an explosive running game. They're averaging 7.2 yards per play on the season, though the scoring has been underwhelming. They've only turned it over 2 times this year, they've just shot themselves in the foot a lot with penalties, not great kicking (3 missed FG against Rutgers), and poor performance on 3rd downs. Rutgers were outgained by over 200 yards and had a 3.3% win expectancy, but pulled off the win. Washington's defense has quietly been good, opposing offenses be damned (3 opponents held to under 10 points, 4.1 yards per play on the season). This was a nice win for Rutgers. Defense looks good again, though they've struggled against the run (5.2 YPC) and while their secondary is good (giving up under 6 Y/A and opponents are completing under 58% of their passes), their DL has struggled to register sacks. I like their running game and they've finally got a passing game that can occasionally threaten.

The schedule still looks favorable, the only games I'd expect them to lose are @Nebraska and @USC. I think 9 wins is very obtainable.

Yeah. Them somehow avoiding Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, and Ohio State is crazy
 
Yeah. Them somehow avoiding Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, and Ohio State is crazy

They do get @OSU, Oregon and PSU next year. Also @Washington
 
Oh I hope they are....just comparing your SOS to ours. Somewhat similar.

Still on our sched are the #1, 2, 9, 12, and 13 teams and yall could be ranked by the time we play.

Yall: #1, 8, 12, 15, 19 & 25
I keep telling you guys, we're more similar than you might have thought
 
Back
Top