50 Years Ago Today!

Nosferatu said:
I like the movie, I don't think it's his best, little slow for me but the cinematography is outstanding!
Click to expand...
The story... OMG. And JW was a beast of a man in that movie. At the end he was not what he thought he was.
 
Nosferatu said:
I like the movie, I don't think it's his best, little slow for me but the cinematography is outstanding!
Click to expand...

He is a real cocksucker in it, which is kind of unusual for Duke, but it’s also got a very, very young Natalie Wood. I think it’s stellar.
 
Godstree said:
Old Man Fighting GIF by Laff
Click to expand...
I have to watch that movie again. It’s been a long time and I bet I’d appreciate it even more now.
 
Hank Kingsley said:
He is a real cocksucker in it, which is kind of unusual for Duke, but it’s also got a very, very young Natalie Wood. I think it’s stellar.
Click to expand...

And the film quality is second to none. Nothing beats a proper film for clarity. If it is transferred properly it's so fine.
 
SlinkyRedfoot said:
Also, get yerself a fuckin avi. Please.
Click to expand...
I like being a question mark.


Also haven't found one I like yet. I wanna be different than the one from .....
 
Not sure why this movie was so popular.
It sucked.

You're Welcome
 
outofyourmind said:
Not sure why this movie was so popular.
It sucked.

You're Welcome
Click to expand...
It's popular because it has chics that spit. You don't get that in most movies.

Also there is /was deep fascination of exorcism.
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
I mean, I’m sure it was scary at the time, but those cheesy early 70’s special effects wouldn’t do much for a millennial like me.

But there were exceptions like the classic Disney cartoon movies and Old Yeller
Click to expand...
Nah, The Exorcist holds up. The practical effects don't go overboard which keeps it out of the cheese. It's a must see if you have any interest in horror movies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top