How successful has your O been this year?

Joined
Aug 19, 2020
Posts
8,613
Reaction score
6,969
Bookie:
$ 1,000.00
It's early and this is a small sample size, especially with many teams playing 1 or 2 cupcakes.

A play is defined as successful if:
  • It gains at least 50% of the yards required to move the chains on first down
  • 70% of yards to gain on second down
  • 100% of yards to gain on third or fourth down).
1869924692_ScreenShot2022-09-11at4_20_11PM.thumb.png.e8ecc656739febb2e7b74de3a8be2c71.png
 
It's early and this is a small sample size, especially with many teams playing 1 or 2 cupcakes.

A play is defined as successful if:
  • It gains at least 50% of the yards required to move the chains on first down
  • 70% of yards to gain on second down
  • 100% of yards to gain on third or fourth down).
1869924692_ScreenShot2022-09-11at4_20_11PM.thumb.png.e8ecc656739febb2e7b74de3a8be2c71.png
IMHO they defined successful play incorrectly (almost randomly), so their ranking does not reflect actual football game goals. What teams aim for is 33% on first down, 50% on second down and 100% on third down. That is the definition of keeping up with the chains.
 
I have no idea.
Either we are holding back some stuff for Nebraska, or we need a lot of work.

We'll see Saturday.
 
It's early and this is a small sample size, especially with many teams playing 1 or 2 cupcakes.

A play is defined as successful if:
  • It gains at least 50% of the yards required to move the chains on first down
  • 70% of yards to gain on second down
  • 100% of yards to gain on third or fourth down).
1869924692_ScreenShot2022-09-11at4_20_11PM.thumb.png.e8ecc656739febb2e7b74de3a8be2c71.png

no GA Southern?
 
I don't think Iowa made the cut.
If it wasn't for special teams I don't think you're offense or defense would have any points lol.
 
Pfff, Easy to look good going against an FCS and the worst defense in FBS :2cents:

OregonDefense.PNG
 
feels like it was going pretty good til Quinn got hurt
 
I'll take it considering we have been missing two of our top receivers
 
Hence that part of my post that says, and I quote:

It's early and this is a small sample size, especially with many teams playing 1 or 2 cupcakes.
I'm just poking at Oregon. Not often you see a team give up a practically perfect efficiency rating (7/7 in the first 7 drives of your season, kudos UGA :clap:)
 
It's early and this is a small sample size, especially with many teams playing 1 or 2 cupcakes.

A play is defined as successful if:
  • It gains at least 50% of the yards required to move the chains on first down
  • 70% of yards to gain on second down
  • 100% of yards to gain on third or fourth down).
1869924692_ScreenShot2022-09-11at4_20_11PM.thumb.png.e8ecc656739febb2e7b74de3a8be2c71.png
I don't know what this all means, but we've scored 51 and 57 and we finally put the 5 star Sophomore as the starting QB. Things look good. But we've played no one.
 
Hammering nails into my eyes would be more pleasuring than watching this teams offense.
 
Hammering nails into my eyes would be more pleasuring than watching this teams offense.

I watched pretty much all the Ga Tech and some of Clemson's other games. Pretty bad when an Ohio State fan is shouting to put the back up in
 
I watched pretty much all the Ga Tech and some of Clemson's other games. Pretty bad when an Ohio State fan is shouting to put the back up in
While I don't think that DJ is the answer ultimately, he's not the biggest issue, imo. Oline is pretty terrible and the wrs aren't what they use to be. I'm optimistic about a guy they are getting back this week, but he's a true freshman coming off an acl tear.
 
Back
Top