Question.

Depends on if the game is home/road/neutral.
Can you give examples. Ie Rutgers is NET 82. Wiscky lost to them at home beat them on the road.

Now there is over 300 teams where is the divide road/home/neutral?
 
Can you give examples. Ie Rutgers is NET 82. Wiscky lost to them at home beat them on the road.

Now there is over 300 teams where is the divide road/home/neutral?

Thats a quad 2 road win.

Quad 3 home loss
 
Ok, but what constitutes quad 3 at home? I just don't understand the system.

  • Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75
  • Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135
  • Quadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 135-240
  • Quadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353
 
Can you give examples. Ie Rutgers is NET 82. Wiscky lost to them at home beat them on the road.

Now there is over 300 teams where is the divide road/home/neutral?

Quad 2 win
Quad 3 loss

It all depends on where you play. You're given more credit for beating someone on the road/neutral than at home. There are also different tiers within the quadrant system. Q1A for example(think elite wins, like Wisconsin winning at Purdue).
 
These are the records of two schools. And their records are almost identical (before tonight's games). But one is way higher than the other...

RANKPREVIOUSSCHOOLCONFERENCERECORDROADNEUTRALHOMEQUAD 1QUAD 2QUAD 3QUAD 4
252524-37-11-116-15-29-15-05-0
2225-38-32-015-05-28-14-08-0
 
These are the records of two schools. And their records are almost identical (before tonight's games). But one is way higher than the other...

RANKPREVIOUSSCHOOLCONFERENCERECORDROADNEUTRALHOMEQUAD 1QUAD 2QUAD 3QUAD 4
252524-37-11-116-15-29-15-05-0
2225-38-32-015-05-28-14-08-0
Wow. What's the reason there is such a gap? Does the two game road, one game neutral and one game loss make that much difference?
 
Wow. What's the reason there is such a gap? Does the two game road, one game neutral and one game loss make that much difference?
Most likely efficiency and predictive analytics

Like my guess is team 1 is Gonzaga. Theyve got 17 wins by 20+ and rank top 10 in offensive and defensive efficiency. Not sure who the 2nd team is but its almost certain their metrics arent as good
 
Last edited:
Most likely efficiency and predictive analytics

Like my guess is team 1 is Gonzaga. Theyve got 17 wins by 20+ and rank top 10 in offensive and defensive efficiency. Not sure who the 2nd team is but its almost certain their metrics arent as good

Providence
 
Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I go by the old eye test and Gonzaga isn't as good as they were last year. I don't give a shit about metrics. That's OK to seed the teams. But I have a feeling there will be a bunch of upsets from the first weekend of NCAA Tournament games.
 
Most likely efficiency and predictive analytics

Like my guess is team 1 is Gonzaga. Theyve got 17 wins by 20+ and rank top 10 in offensive and defensive efficiency. Not sure who the 2nd team is but its almost certain their metrics arent as good

Providence and Arizona
 
Back
Top