Sorry, Aggys…

Deep Creek said:
So, among those three we are trying to find the tallest midget?
Click to expand...

Animated GIF
 
Tharvot said:
Didn't think I'd have to give you a play by play, but here we are.

If you take the top teams in each conference: Utah & Oregon in the PAC; Okie St & Baylor in the B12; Pitt & WF in the ACC. On paper, the ACC seems the weakest of the 3. The PAC IMO slightly stronger than the B12, but pretty even. Not a ton of difference all around IMO and wouldn't be surprised between the 6 if any team beat the other.

Go down a level to the next tier (programs with winning records) and you have Clemson, NCSt, and Miami in the ACC; the B12 has OU, Iowa St, and KState; the PAC has ASU, UCLA, Ore St, Wash St. Again, I don't see any real separation here. Pac I'd give the edge to just simply for having more programs above .500.

Next level is teams with a .500 record: ACC - Louisville, VTech, Virginia, UNC, Boston College; B12 - WVU, TTU; PAC - none. The ACC appears to be strongest here and PAC the weakest.

Final level consists of the shitty programs and some big names that historically underperformed: ACC - FSU, Syracuse, GT, Duke; B12 - Texas, TCU, Kansas; Pac - USC, Colorado, Cal, Washington, Stanford, Arizona.

If i go down the list level by level, there's no way I can definitively say the B12 is better than the other 2 conferences. Maybe a stretch for me to way they were the worst, but you could definitely make a fine argument that any of the 3 is better or worse than the other 2.
Click to expand...
LOL at this opinion

I wouldn’t argue if you made it just about the ACC and B12. I could see an argument for the ACC being better.

There is no way I could see you make an argument for the Pac this year. The PAC managed to lose 7 games to G5 or 1-AA teams. None of that includes them going 0fer against a semi Power but not really BYU who is really good. BYU managed to lose by 2 touchdowns vs B12 champ game winner Baylor. BYU still swept the PAC including wins over conference champ UTAH. The B12 with 2 less teams still has 1 more ranked team in the top 25. And while not a huge indicator, the B12 went 2-0 vs the PAC.

You could of just said because Oregon won at Ohio State, I say the Pac was better.
 
ralphiewvu said:
LOL at this opinion

I wouldn’t argue if you made it just about the ACC and B12. I could see an argument for the ACC being better.

There is no way I could see you make an argument for the Pac this year. The PAC managed to lose 7 games to G5 or 1-AA teams. None of that includes them going 0fer against a semi Power but not really BYU who is really good. BYU managed to lose by 2 touchdowns vs B12 champ game winner Baylor. BYU still swept the PAC including wins over conference champ UTAH. The B12 with 2 less teams still has 1 more ranked team in the top 25. And while not a huge indicator, the B12 went 2-0 vs the PAC.

You could of just said because Oregon won at Ohio State, I say the Pac was better.
Click to expand...

Well I guess because you say so, then the matter is closed.

Doesn't matter. The B12 is trash.
 
Tharvot said:
Well I guess because you say so, then the matter is closed.

Doesn't matter. The B12 is trash.
Click to expand...
I’ve backed up my critique of your bullshit opinion with facts.

It’s not my fault you have very few to support your opinion.

Everyone is looking up at the SEC, even your precious B1G. Get over it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top