The 1980+ 10 Bucket NBA Draft QF2 : Sushi vs Femur

Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Posts
10,450
Reaction score
11,863
Bookie:
$ 207,340.00
Location
Texas
SUSHI

FIRST HALF
PG2 - Kenny Smith
SG1 - Latrell Sprewell
SF2 - Malik Sealy
PF1 - Shareef Abdur-Rahim
C2 - Raef LaFrentz

SECOND HALF
PG1 - Kenny Anderson
SG2 - Cuttino Mobley
SF1 - Glenn Robinson
PF2 - Tom Gugliotta
C1 - Jermaine O'Neal

VS

FEMUR

FIRST HALF
PG2 - Damon Stoudamire
SG2 - Anthony Peeler
SF2 - Cedric Ceballos
PF2 - Wayman Tisdale
C2 - Duane Causwell

SECOND HALF
PG1 - Rod Strickland
SG1 - Eddie Jones
SF1 - Gerald Wallace
PF1 - Robert Horry
C1 - Al Jefferson
 
SUSHI - 3
FEMUR - 5

VOTED - Shane, Nos, 500, Ducey, Sushi, Devil, UK, Milk

First to 5
 
Last edited:
2H is very close. I like Sushi’s 1H a little more. Sushi
 
Sushi in a close one.
 
2 kennys vs 0 kennys sushi wins the kenny war... but is that enough??

femur takes down the giant... too bad michael cooper couldn't save the day
 
Down goes Frazier, down goes Frazier!
 
I don’t see how Femur beats me without any primary scorers or floor spacing or any dominant defenders but nothing I can do now.

@femurov good game.
 
i change my vote to sushi...
You should.

I just double checked again and I have 6 players on my team who made an all star team as opposed to the 3 on Femurs. Additionally he has a total of 5 AS appearances as opposed to my 15.

The 4 guys who didn’t make the AS game were Cuttino Mobley who shot 38% from 3 and averaged 16 pts a game, Kenny Smith who averaged 12.8 pts, 5.5 Apg and shot 40% from 3. Even in the bum ass center bucket I got the one offensively valuable guy who shot 36% from 3 for his career as a center.
 
Haters gonna hate...
 
You should.

I just double checked again and I have 6 players on my team who made an all star team as opposed to the 3 on Femurs. Additionally he has a total of 5 AS appearances as opposed to my 15.

The 4 guys who didn’t make the AS game were Cuttino Mobley who shot 38% from 3 and averaged 16 pts a game, Kenny Smith who averaged 12.8 pts, 5.5 Apg and shot 40% from 3. Even in the bum ass center bucket I got the one offensively valuable guy who shot 36% from 3 for his career as a center.



IMO all star appearances mean nothing. I also noticed you mentioned 3's. I will not speak for anyone else but when I draft and vote in NBA drafts especially when we use older players I view these guys playing in the 90's not 2020 so nobody is throwing up 15 3's a game.

So, in no way am I trying to argue your points here but i'm on record probably 100 times saying voting sucks and the best team doesn't always win but we need a winner so we deal with it.
 
IMO all star appearances mean nothing. I also noticed you mentioned 3's. I will not speak for anyone else but when I draft and vote in NBA drafts especially when we use older players I view these guys playing in the 90's not 2020 so nobody is throwing up 15 3's a game.

So, in no way am I trying to argue your points here but i'm on record probably 100 times saying voting sucks and the best team doesn't always win but we need a winner so we deal with it.
All star appearances aren’t the end all be all but they’re certainly not nothing. Especially in this particular draft where quality players were hard to come by the AS appearance at least indicates at one point in that players career they were very good players. So IMO, for this draft, they make some sense.

3 point shooting is relevant not from a volume stand point but from a balance stand point. The more balance a team has the more ways they can stay effective. 3 point shooting is the equivalent to having lead off hitters and table setters for the power hitters. If the power hitters don’t have anyone to knock in, is their power more or less effective? If you have 3 point shooting you open up the court for your primary scorers. It makes subpar scorers more effective. Just the presence of shooting and not just the volume is a big factor.

I mean even Jordan needed Paxton, Kerr, BJ Armstrong, Craig Hodges, etc to balance the offense.
 
All star appearances aren’t the end all be all but they’re certainly not nothing. Especially in this particular draft where quality players were hard to come by the AS appearance at least indicates at one point in that players career they were very good players. So IMO, for this draft, they make some sense.

3 point shooting is relevant not from a volume stand point but from a balance stand point. The more balance a team has the more ways they can stay effective. 3 point shooting is the equivalent to having lead off hitters and table setters for the power hitters. If the power hitters don’t have anyone to knock in, is their power more or less effective? If you have 3 point shooting you open up the court for your primary scorers. It makes subpar scorers more effective. Just the presence of shooting and not just the volume is a big factor.

I mean even Jordan needed Paxton, Kerr, BJ Armstrong, Craig Hodges, etc to balance the offense.


In today's game sure. First team I thought of is the bad boys Pistons.


1612745806189.png


It's a way different game today.
 
Back
Top