To point at a target. Alec pointed it at her and pulled the trigger. Are you saying he didn't?
I'm asking if there's any evidence he intentionally aimed it at her. You know, like by looking down the sights.
Have you never held a pistol before?
To point at a target. Alec pointed it at her and pulled the trigger. Are you saying he didn't?
Other than the trajectory of the bullet? What is the first rule of gun safety? Is it don't point at anything you don't intend to kill? I have qualified in two branches of the military with .45ACP, 9MM, grenades, grenade launchers, LAW rockets, 60 Cal, 50 Cal and an old M1(shark watch on swim call required it). I have had a CCW license for over a decade before constitutional carry was passed here. How about you?I'm asking if there's any evidence he intentionally aimed it at her. You know, like by looking down the sights.
Have you never held a pistol before?
Other than the trajectory of the bullet? What is the first rule of gun safety? Is it don't point at anything you don't intend to kill? I have qualified in two branches of the military with .45ACP, 9MM, grenades, grenade launchers, LAW rockets, 60 Cal, 50 Cal and an old M1(shark watch on swim call required it). I have had a CCW license for over a decade before constitutional carry was passed here. How about you?
They purposefully break the rules of gun safety in hundreds of movies you yourself have patronized. You’re stance here is bunk.Other than the trajectory of the bullet? What is the first rule of gun safety? Is it don't point at anything you don't intend to kill? I have qualified in two branches of the military with .45ACP, 9MM, grenades, grenade launchers, LAW rockets, 60 Cal, 50 Cal and an old M1(shark watch on swim call required it). I have had a CCW license for over a decade before constitutional carry was passed here. How about you?
Who the fuck ever makes such an argument? It's an involuntary manslaughter charge. That means someone exhibited criminal reckless behavior that resulted in someone's death.I'm asking if there's any evidence he intentionally aimed it at her. You know, like by looking down the sights.
Have you never held a pistol before?
Is that real, or some farce that Piers put together? She actually had a case of battery against Baldwin before that, but there is no way she could win anything after that display. Assuming it is “real”, of course.
Yeah it's her and it's real.
They deserve each other. Unapologetic, self-centered attention whores. The best response would be to ban either from ever appearing in audio or video ever again.Fucking bitch.
Don’t make me side with Alec Baldwin. Little pisses me off more.
It seems that pointing a firearm at someone and pulling the trigger can be negligent ...Wait
I thought they convicted the Armorer
I would normally come back with “but it is a movie, that is what is supposed to happen”, but the fact that there is no recording of the actual shot pretty much nullifies that argument. He shot the gun when there was no filming taking place.It seems that pointing a firearm at someone and pulling the trigger can be negligent ...
Wait
I thought they convicted the Armorer
I agree.but Baldwin the “producer” has a LOT.
You’ve patronized hundreds of movies where they do that purposefully, as a matter of course.It seems that pointing a firearm at someone and pulling the trigger can be negligent ...