Because you see them try to make anything and everything into a story or some sort of "news". In no way does it translate to anything real though such as saying "potential is better than results". Results is always better. Potential in sports is fun to talk about though.
Shouldn’t a guy named Will Rogers be playing at Oklahoma? Or at least an Oklahoma school?
Hope, another way when the prospect is better than the known commodity. It's subjective to each person, but still happens.
So if you had the #1 pick next year you would rather take Jamarcus Russell over Bryce Young? I mean, Jamarcus has NFL results and those are always better, in your mind.
JR was selected as the #1 overall pick.... this argument works against you more than for you imo. Now the thread topic is about top 20 QBs.... does the potential of JR stack up? Because the results of him don't. Likewise could happen for someone like Ewers. Might have all the HS talent in the world, but he hasn't played a snap in CFB and could come out and be the CFB equivalent of what JR or RL did in the NFL. If NDS made the leap to the FBS, you wouldn't rank them in the top 20 because they were great at the level below. Likewise with players.
What are you babbling about now? You said, and I quote "Results is always better" in retort to my comment that "sometimes the prospect is better than the results"...which means sometimes the prospect is better than the known commodity.
Except that is what you are doing. But ok.
Even more nonsensical than the previous statement.
Still chapped about what? Projecting much? Still bitchy about pit bulls huh? Too bad that doesn't change the facts about them.
I'm right about the reason the prospects that have never played a snap are ranked higher in this OP article. You are wrong and everyone knows it.
Just like that silly JR argument. Lol gotcha.
Lol this all you silly fucks have been able to say, go back on some sort of weak ass student loan comment because you have nothing even though I have repeatedly said I wasn't for forgiveness. Figures though, you have nothing so you distract and deflect.
. You didnt show nor say absolutely anything the refuted anything I said. You wanting to split hairs on aggressiveness even though I never said any dog was more or less aggressive then the next just shows how stupid and wrapped up in this you are. This is a prime example of how emotions can cloud a judgment. Intelligent enough? LMAO ok.
Michigan doesn't even know who the QB will be and if it is Cade McNamara -- he isn't winning shit.
You said aggressive, not dangerous, and I told you they aren't more aggressive. Sorry that you spoke out of your ass and I proved it. Again, be better.Just like that silly JR argument. Lol gotcha.
Lol this all you silly fucks have been able to say, go back on some sort of weak ass student loan comment because you have nothing even though I have repeatedly said I wasn't for forgiveness. Figures though, you have nothing so you distract and deflect.
How are those Pitt attacks and deaths coming along? But oh please tell me about how chihuahuas are the real threat
Let me know when ANY breed comes close to the level of attacks or deaths that are attributed to Pitts and you may have an argument.
LMAO
Max Johnson is just as good of a name as General Booty.
Should have gone to the same school. General Booty could have been a back up to Max Johnson
Cade is the current B10 champion and the first Michigan QB to beat a ranked OSU team in more than two decades.