I Am Ready For College Football!

Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Posts
8,084
Reaction score
4,998
Bookie:
$ 1,000.00
I know that some things have to get settled, and some stuff isn't carved in stone yet, but let's talk football. As of now,

1. Which teams are in your 4 team playoff/invitational or whatever you want to call it?
2. Who are your top 3 Heisman players?
3. Does a team not win their conference and still make the playoff? If so, who?
4. Which team(s) is "really going to be back"?
5. What do you consider your team's trap game?
 
1. Georgia, Alabama, Texas A&M, Ole Miss
2. Stetson Bennett, Brock Bowers, Jalen Carter
3. Yes, Alabama, Texas A&M and Ole Miss
4. Georgia
5. They don’t have one
 
1. #1 Alabama #2 Ohio State #3 Georgia #4 Notre Dame
2. Bruce Young, CJ Stroud, Jaxson Smith Njigba
3. Georgia and Notre Dame
4. Texas wins the Big 12
5. ND's trap game IMO is Boston College. After the Navy game, before the USC game. Also, while there being a little rivalry between the two. BC isn't great, but fully capable of beating us, if we're looking ahead and/or not recovered from the Navy game.
 
1. Bama, Ohio St, Clemson, USC
2. Stroud, C. Williams, B. Allen
3. Not this year
4. Nebraska
5. Rutgers
 
I know that some things have to get settled, and some stuff isn't carved in stone yet, but let's talk football. As of now,

1. Which teams are in your 4 team playoff/invitational or whatever you want to call it?
2. Who are your top 3 Heisman players?
3. Does a team not win their conference and still make the playoff? If so, who?
4. Which team(s) is "really going to be back"?
5. What do you consider your team's trap game?
I mean. I love CFB but I learned a while ago not to wish away the Summer.
 
I know that some things have to get settled, and some stuff isn't carved in stone yet, but let's talk football. As of now,

1. Which teams are in your 4 team playoff/invitational or whatever you want to call it?
2. Who are your top 3 Heisman players?
3. Does a team not win their conference and still make the playoff? If so, who?
4. Which team(s) is "really going to be back"?
5. What do you consider your team's trap game?
1. Alabama, Ohio St., Georgia, Oklahoma (with USC as a sleeper)
2. Pardon my French, .......... Fuck the Heisman
3. Georgia
4.
5. Tennessee- @Auburn the week before, @Florida the week after
5a. UAB- @Arkansas the week before, @Texas A&M the week after
 
I know that some things have to get settled, and some stuff isn't carved in stone yet, but let's talk football. As of now,

1. Which teams are in your 4 team playoff/invitational or whatever you want to call it?
2. Who are your top 3 Heisman players?
3. Does a team not win their conference and still make the playoff? If so, who?
4. Which team(s) is "really going to be back"?
5. What do you consider your team's trap game?
1. Bama, UGA, tOSU and the winner of the ACC.
2. Bryce, Stroud, Bijan Robinson
3. Yes ... one of Bama or UGA
4. Have no idea.
5. Ours will be Miss State - we have a back loaded schedule this year with UF, UTjr, @MSU, and @Ky. I am going with @MSU.
 
1. A&M , OSU , USC , Bama
2. Jaxson Smith Njigba , Will Anderson, Brian Bresse
3. Bama will get a mulligan for using NIL "ethically" per Saban
4. Wisconsin
5. Georgia Tech - Who the hell schedule's a game on a Monday :facepalm:
 
You shouldn't be allowed to play for natties if you didn't win your conference.

Change my mind.
 
You shouldn't be allowed to play for natties if you didn't win your conference.

Change my mind.
I don't type this because we didn't win our conference ... I made the same argument when Bama beat us in2017 and we won the SEC and they didn't even play in the game:

- The current configuration of CFP simply does not specify that CCs is in some way an elimination game. If the idea was that the 10 conferences played a CCG, and the 10 winners then played in the CFP, cool. But that's not what everyone agreed to.

- The state goal of the CFP is to match the 4 best teams - if that means that if one didn't play in a CCG - Notre Dame who typically can't, Bama in 2017 - but is still one of the top 4 they should be in.

- Why should a loss in the CCG be any different from losing, say, the 6th game of the season. A loss is a loss. When it happens doesn't matter unless the rules say it does. The rules don't say that it does.

- By rules CCGs are not even considered until and unless they teams the committee is comparing are deemed to be the same. Then they can look to see if they won their conference. That means that if the team that didn't play or lost the CCG is still better than any ranked 5+, then consideration of the CC is not even allowed.

If, after reading that, you still think you shouldn't be allowed to play for the natty, you are simply ignoring the CFP rules and setup that your team and all others agreed to.
 
1. Texas, Utah, LSU, tosu
2. Ewers, Rising, JSN
3. No
4. Texas, LSU
5. Bama
 
You shouldn't be allowed to play for natties if you didn't win your conference.

Change my mind.
I don't remember much complaining when Nebraska got to play for a natty in 2001 or Oklahoma in 2003, and that was back when there wasn't even a playoff. Seems it's only an issue when it's an SEC team and said team wins.
 
Back
Top