Uh huh… you’ve stated a lot of things.
I didn't realize i had to be so specific with people who follow college football.
LOL no by turn it around i mean do just as good as Michigan, Penn State etc. You're on crack if you think you have any advantage over Nebraska just because of your location.
Major derpage on your part.
The right coach will get nebraska on this list in due time
View attachment 84741
Michigan has an ENORMOUS advantage over Nebraska. One, we have blue chip recruits in state -- some years we even have 5 star recruits in state. Nebraska does not.
Michigan has been playing in the Midwest forever, unlike Nebraska, so those top recruits in state like Indiana, Wisconsin, Illinois -- Michigan can and does sign them, as well as kids from Ohio. (I.E. surrounding states) Nebraska has only been a Midwest program for a decade or so.
Michigan has nationally elite academics, Nebraska ranks at the bottom of the B1G. So those elite recruits whose parents want academic/athletic balance -- Michigan gets those guys. 5 star Rashan Gary was because his mom loved UM's academics. 5 star Jabrill Peppers was because his parents loved the academics. 5 star Daxton Hill was because his parents loved the academics. 5 star Donovan Peoples Jones was because his parents loved the academics.
Nebraska is never signing a guy because of their academics.
Ann Arbor is regularly ranked one of, if not, the best college towns in America. I can't say anything about Nebraska as I haven't seen them on those lists.
I can't tell if you are serious, but if you think Nebraska has ANY chance in today's CFB to recruit like Michigan -- I'd like you pass what you are smoking because it isn't happening. Nebraska simply doesn't have anything to offer a recruit they can't get elsewhere. Outright buying recruiting classes would be the only way Nebraska would outrecruit UM right now.