GAME #6 OREGON DUCKS vs #25 washington fuskies 7pm EST on FOX

Wizardhawk said:
Peyton Henry missed a similar FG 4 years ago at Autzen that would have won the game for UW in regulation. Oregon went on to win in overtime.

New head coach Deboer was aware of this and put his kicker out there for the chance of redemption.

It was one of the most satisfying FG's in a very long time.

Really cool story for a kid that carried around that loss for 4 years until making up for it big time last night.
Click to expand...
I was thinking about that when he was ran out there. Sure is fun to watch these kids grow up. That's why I love college football.
 
Hitman Hart said:
can't decide which one of OD's meltdown posts i like the most

its probably between these three gems:





i'm leaning towards "HOT FUCKIN DAMN IT" b/c that sounds like something Randy Marsh would say
Click to expand...
BIT B
 
Reading the duck fans losing their damned minds over that play was hilarious.

Defender does not secure the ball all the way to the ground. You don't get credit for a catch without either making a football move or at least securing it to the ground. He did neither. McMillan just wanted it more. Ducks D need to workout more.

@OregonDucks has to agree right?
 
OregonDucks said:
Gonzalez has majority possession of the ball and his knee is down. Epic robbery
Click to expand...
You know 'majority possession' isn't a thing right?

Have to control it through the process of being tackled and he didn't. Receiver never took his hand off the ball. You can hate the rule, but that's the rule.

Defender has it coming out before his knees hit the ground and McMillan pulls it in. He was the only one that had control of it on the ground.
 
Wizardhawk said:
Reading the duck fans losing their damned minds over that play was hilarious.

Defender does not secure the ball all the way to the ground. You don't get credit for a catch without either making a football move or at least securing it to the ground. He did neither. McMillan just wanted it more. Ducks D need to workout more.

@OregonDucks has to agree right?
Click to expand...
doesnt a tie go to the offense anyway? thats how i saw it besides the fact it was bouncing around in there.
 
OlyDuck said:
doesnt a tie go to the offense anyway? thats how i saw it besides the fact it was bouncing around in there.
Click to expand...

Yes the tie ALWAYS goes to the offense

Even if the defender has "more control" at one point if they come to the ground even close to tied up it 100% always goes to the offense.
 
OlyDuck said:
doesnt a tie go to the offense anyway? thats how i saw it besides the fact it was bouncing around in there.
Click to expand...
Yes. I spoke of the simultaneous catch earlier. The post here was just for OD. He believes the refs screwed the ducks with that call, and the illegal touching call at the end. You know the ducks never lose, they are only screwed by the refs or time zone, band being put too far from the field, etc.
 
I mean it was a hell of a play by McMillan. That second video shows how hard he fought for it.
 
Wizardhawk said:
Yes. I spoke of the simultaneous catch earlier. The post here was just for OD. He believes the refs screwed the ducks with that call, and the illegal touching call at the end. You know the ducks never lose, they are only screwed by the refs or time zone, band being put too far from the field, etc.
Click to expand...
Come on man!!! Don't you know you should have listed the band thing FIRST? That is the #1 reason they lost to the Dawgs.
 
Wizardhawk said:
I mean it was a hell of a play by McMillan. That second video shows how hard he fought for it.
Click to expand...

owusu.0.gif
 
Wizardhawk said:
Yes. I spoke of the simultaneous catch earlier. The post here was just for OD. He believes the refs screwed the ducks with that call, and the illegal touching call at the end. You know the ducks never lose, they are only screwed by the refs or time zone, band being put too far from the field, etc.
Click to expand...
im a forever optimist with Oregon but also see things in reality.
Oregon screwed themselves with swinging gate. threw off timing and oregon fumbled on the goal line.
Oregon screwed themselves with on sides kick to opposite side. im not entirely mad at the try but the one against UCLA worked because the kicker kicked and ran straight ahead. not saying it would have worked but i think would have been chance.
the "int" was not.
the step out of bounds was not forced did he actually step out? i dont know ive seen plays where toes were in and heel was over the line but not down on the ground. only thing that could have turned that is a cam down that line in the area.
I believe Oregon would have went for it on 4th down if Bo didnt get hurt. instead they took 3
the Slip was the nail. Oregon was running well for good yards all night. people think they should have burned a time out to get bo back in. coming off whatever ankle injury even double taped i woulndt have.
 
OlyDuck said:
im a forever optimist with Oregon but also see things in reality.
Oregon screwed themselves with swinging gate. threw off timing and oregon fumbled on the goal line.
Oregon screwed themselves with on sides kick to opposite side. im not entirely mad at the try but the one against UCLA worked because the kicker kicked and ran straight ahead. not saying it would have worked but i think would have been chance.
the "int" was not.
the step out of bounds was not forced did he actually step out? i dont know ive seen plays where toes were in and heel was over the line but not down on the ground. only thing that could have turned that is a cam down that line in the area.
I believe Oregon would have went for it on 4th down if Bo didnt get hurt. instead they took 3
the Slip was the nail. Oregon was running well for good yards all night. people think they should have burned a time out to get bo back in. coming off whatever ankle injury even double taped i woulndt have.
Click to expand...
While we will never know for sure, there were 2 to 3 UW defenders across the LOS quickly enough that I doubt they get the first down even if he didn't slip. It looked like UW had that play pegged. Not just the obvious that it was going to be a run considering the backup QB, but where it was going.

Had they put Nix back in UW would have had to both honor the pass and the QB run. Even running the exact same play would have had a higher chance to work.

The onside try was kind of dumb and I believe he said as much after the game. I think he said he made like 8 mistakes?

It did look like a veteran HC vs a rookie HC.

Both teams made their share of mistakes. UW just came up with one less than Oregon at the end.

I did hear Wilner say he thought the conference might be sending off something to the NY offices about the fake injury. I guess they actually used the same WR for it as they did against Cal? I didn't see that one, but I guess you could see someone telling him to go down before he dropped.

I don't know how they can fix that, but something has to be done. When teams feel they can do it whenever they want without repercussions it has to be addressed. At the very least make any players requiring play stoppage to sit out the next 3 plays or something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top