You keep bringing up the Nebraska truck case, so I'll explain why it's relevant even though you keep spelling it like it was some dumb reference.
There are rules for where disputes are resolved. I've pointed that out - legal concepts of jurisdiction, and conflicts of laws when those concepts conflict. You keep saying that because the B12 is incorporated in Delaware, they get to choose where the jurisdiction is for their litigation. I provided a US Supreme court case that showed you were full of shit and you responded like a typical WebAttorney with TLDR. Basically, you can't understand what I wrote, so you just ignored it.
The wreck example is to show you
that corporations in lawsuits don't get to decide where they are sued just by filing papers in another jurisdiction. Hell, if it were that easy, I'd have incorporated in the state of Washington, and then whenever I got sued, I'd make them go to Washington to sue me. Smart people can see that you aren't allowed to do that. It's called "forum shopping." Here is a link - you won't read it because it has too many words, and/or you are too dumb to understand them -
Forum shopping - Wikipedia
In any event, the truck example was to show you that a corporation doesn't get to decide where to file the suit - there are rules in place to do that.
You last point is kind of funny because that is what I said in my very first post - the parties may well have agreed where the contract dispute would be heard. Hell, I provided a clause I used in my agreements. So, you finally say one thing correct, and it's something I brought up 5 pages of post ago, and doesn't help you idiot ideas.
Put down the knife, son, you are outgunned here, and it's not even close.
