- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 26,159
- Reaction score
- 29,113
- Bookie:
- $ 500.00
- Location
- Sitting in Houston Traffic....




he will have so many weapons if they can't pull ARod from GB
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he will have so many weapons if they can't pull ARod from GB
he will have so many weapons if they can't pull ARod from GB
he will have so many weapons if they can't pull ARod from GB
jets would be dumb to give 2 firsts for one year rental to a player not fully committedFrom what I gather, Rodgers-to-the-Jets is pretty much a done deal; with the two hold-ups being 1) the Packers want two 1sts and the Jets don't want to give up two 1sts or this year's 1st so there's a bit of a poker match going on between the two franchises; and 2) if the trade occurs before June 1st GB is on the hook for $40M in dead cap for 2023 versus after June 1st it would be $15M this year and $25M next year - which might be was GB prefers if they can't get this year's 1st out of the Jets. Ultimately, the longer the Jets hold out on compensation for Rodgers the more it favors the Packers if the trade doesn't become official before the draft.
GB has been using the Stafford trade as the template. I agree with you that it's reaching and I think that the Stafford trade isn't apples-to-apples with this Rodgers situation either; but I also don't blame GB for using it as a template or trying to maximize their return. Do I think GB will get two firsts out of the deal? Probably not, but I think it's a pretty good starting point for negotiations from GBs perspective and I continue to hold out some hope that it might actually happen because - let's face it - it's the Jets!jets would be dumb to give 2 firsts for one year rental to a player not fully committed
I think GB ends up with 2nd this year and conditional pick next year that is dependent on Rodgers coming back and/or how far NYJ went. To get this years first, I would think NYJ would expect GB to pick up his entire bonus this year
just my guess
GB could've got the package Seattle got last year for Russ
What's GBs leverage?GB has been using the Stafford trade as the template. I agree with you that it's reaching and I think that the Stafford trade isn't apples-to-apples with this Rodgers situation either; but I also don't blame GB for using it as a template or trying to maximize their return. Do I think GB will get two firsts out of the deal? Probably not, but I think it's a pretty good starting point for negotiations from GBs perspective and I continue to hold out some hope that it might actually happen because - let's face it - it's the Jets!
That’s my thought. The Jets are getting one, maybe two years out of the guy if he comes. They’ve got a fan base that’s highly accustomed to losing. You think they can’t sell their fan base on we’re not going mortgage the future of this franchise on a short-term diva who can’t win in the playoffs?What's GBs leverage?
Fine we'll just keep an expensive malcontent?
He's got a career 12-10 record in the playoffs thoughThat’s my thought. The Jets are getting one, maybe two years out of the guy if he comes. They’ve got a fan base that’s highly accustomed to losing. You think they can’t sell their fan base on we’re not going mortgage the future of this franchise on a short-term diva who can’t win in the playoffs?
A third of those wins were in one year and he hasn’t won a big game since.He's got a career 12-10 record in the playoffs though
Do you think it's all his fault though? I mean, objectively speaking he's still a very good QBA third of those wins were in one year and he hasn’t won a big game since.
He’s one of the best regular season quarterbacks of all time.Do you think it's all his fault though? I mean, objectively speaking he's still a very good QB
He's also one of the best postseason QBs of all-time, he just hasn't had a great team around him.He’s one of the best regular season quarterbacks of all time.
That’s simply not true. He’s had teams that were good enough to win, but they didn’t. Year after year. At some point, you have to stop making excusesHe's also one of the best postseason QBs of all-time, he just hasn't had a great team around him.
GB's leverage is the Jets' moves. The Jets hired Hackett to lure Rodgers. The Jets sent a group of top admins to Rodgers' house to lure him. Jets players courted Rodgers. The Jets signed Lazard to lure Rodgers. This is a very public and showy all-hands-on-deck courting of Rodgers. They can't simply not pay the Packers' asking price after all this. They will pay; but first they will negotiate.What's GBs leverage?
Fine we'll just keep an expensive malcontent?
I'm saying statistically, he's undoubtedly one of the best. 5th best QB rating, 65% comp, 5,894 yards, 45 TD/13 INT in 22 games. He's performed better than Montana who is widely regarded a a top playoff QB as well.That’s simply not true. He’s had teams that were good enough to win, but they didn’t. Year after year. At some point, you have to stop making excuses
I suppose it comes down to whether you’d prefer to have a QB who puts up good stats or one who helps his team win.I'm saying statistically, he's undoubtedly one of the best. 5th best QB rating, 65% comp, 5,894 yards, 45 TD/13 INT in 22 games. He's performed better than Montana who is widely regarded a a top playoff QB as well.
no, i agree they're not going to just get 3rd or 4th, but Jets are taking on a big contract and money off GB's hands for a guy that might play 2 years who is already out the door? There are also no other teams bidding and Rodgers probably wouldn't accept another team at this point and time anyways.GB's leverage is the Jets' moves. The Jets hired Hackett to lure Rodgers. The Jets sent a group of top admins to Rodgers' house to lure him. Jets players courted Rodgers. The Jets signed Lazard to lure Rodgers. This is a very public and showy all-hands-on-deck courting of Rodgers. They can't simply not pay the Packers' asking price after all this. They will pay; but first they will negotiate.
hard to compare stats across different era's, different rules, different playing stylesI'm saying statistically, he's undoubtedly one of the best. 5th best QB rating, 65% comp, 5,894 yards, 45 TD/13 INT in 22 games. He's performed better than Montana who is widely regarded a a top playoff QB as well.