Conference teams that played 10 P5 opponents in 2022...

Probably Clemson in the Covid year, but Lawrence was out that game, and they made DJU look like a decent QB that game too

Eh they lost the real meaningful matchup with Clemson (badly) in the ACC title game though so that kind of negates that, not to mention also getting ran over by Alabama as well after that.
 
You're talking about one kid out of many he put in the NFL during his time at Cincy though. Also it would've been really weird to see Lattimore, Okudah, Ward, etc. lock down the field and then have Damon Arnette win the Thorpe.

I don't think Wisconsin should go to the air raid and never said anything like that. They need to find and develop true playmakers at the QB spot but that isn't the same. My issue with them for the last 15 years is they've had championship level defenses and rushing attacks, but they fell short every time because they didn't have the QB talent outside of one year from Russell Wilson. They have shown they can have those elite defenses, offensive lines, and rushing attacks. If Fickell can find and develop a QB, they're going to be a playoff contender IMO.
Gardner completely shut down half the field and the best WR on the other team. Teams didn't even throw it his way. When that happens, it allows your defense to dedicate itself to helping lock the other side down. To put it in perspective how little teams threw his way. He gave up 113 yards receiving FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR. There is a reason why one guy was drafted in the top 5 and the other CB was drafted in the 4th round. So yes -- Bryant won the Thorpe, but if you remove Gardner from Cincy -- they have a completely different defense and I would wager Bryant isn't winning anything, as he now has less help over the top, has to cover the top threat on the other team, etc.

Back to Wisconsin though -- Phil Longo is an air raid offensive coordinator, that is who they are bringing in. Wisconsin is going to be a completely different offense. With it, it will also change their defense. Why? Their defense will be on the field WAY more, as the offense won't be having 10+ minute drives running it down people's throat. They aren't going to be recruiting the same type of players. Look at when Rich Rod came to Michigan to run his offense -- they completely changed who they recruited on offense and defense. So saying Wisconsin will have elite this and that because they had it in the past means nothing when they will have an entire new philosophy on the offensive side of the ball.
 
Gardner completely shut down half the field and the best WR on the other team. Teams didn't even throw it his way. When that happens, it allows your defense to dedicate itself to helping lock the other side down. To put it in perspective how little teams threw his way. He gave up 113 yards receiving FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR. There is a reason why one guy was drafted in the top 5 and the other CB was drafted in the 4th round. So yes -- Bryant won the Thorpe, but if you remove Gardner from Cincy -- they have a completely different defense and I would wager Bryant isn't winning anything, as he now has less help over the top, has to cover the top threat on the other team, etc.

Back to Wisconsin though -- Phil Longo is an air raid offensive coordinator, that is who they are bringing in. Wisconsin is going to be a completely different offense. With it, it will also change their defense. Why? Their defense will be on the field WAY more, as the offense won't be having 10+ minute drives running it down people's throat. They aren't going to be recruiting the same type of players. Look at when Rich Rod came to Michigan to run his offense -- they completely changed who they recruited on offense and defense. So saying Wisconsin will have elite this and that because they had it in the past means nothing when they will have an entire new philosophy on the offensive side of the ball.
I'm not downplaying Gardner's impact and how elite he was, but again, it's not like Bryant was crap and won the award for being crap. Again, also, the NFL talent Fickell developed in a short time there was apparent. He got to Cincy in 2017, and for the next for the next 3 years they had 1 player drafted in each draft. Then in 2021, a class almost entirely developed by Fickell, they had 4 drafted. In 2022, there were 9 that got drafted. There were then 3 more drafted this year. That's 16 kids over 3 years, with 6 of them being drafted in the early rounds. You can't just act like he got lucky with 1 player and that's all he did.

For Longo, I didn't actually realized he was classified as "air raid", which doesn't make any sense at all. UNC ran far more often than they threw during his time at UNC, with 2022 being the only season they had more pass attempts than rush attempts, while typical air raid schemes throw normally 65+% of the time. They also had 3 different RBs run for 1,000+ yards during his 4 years, so I'm not sure it's some wild departure. It might not be elite the first couple of years, but let him recruit his guys in. I see no reason it can't work.
 
I'm not downplaying Gardner's impact and how elite he was, but again, it's not like Bryant was crap and won the award for being crap. Again, also, the NFL talent Fickell developed in a short time there was apparent. He got to Cincy in 2017, and for the next for the next 3 years they had 1 player drafted in each draft. Then in 2021, a class almost entirely developed by Fickell, they had 4 drafted. In 2022, there were 9 that got drafted. There were then 3 more drafted this year. That's 16 kids over 3 years, with 6 of them being drafted in the early rounds. You can't just act like he got lucky with 1 player and that's all he did.

For Longo, I didn't actually realized he was classified as "air raid", which doesn't make any sense at all. UNC ran far more often than they threw during his time at UNC, with 2022 being the only season they had more pass attempts than rush attempts, while typical air raid schemes throw normally 65+% of the time. They also had 3 different RBs run for 1,000+ yards during his 4 years, so I'm not sure it's some wild departure. It might not be elite the first couple of years, but let him recruit his guys in. I see no reason it can't work.
Your last comment is exactly why Wisconsin will be completely different. Let him recruit his guys in. That means going away from what made Wisconsin what it was. A grind it out team that ate up the play clock and wore defenses down, while their defense got to rest of the sideline.

I'm an expert when it comes to this because Michigan does the EXACT same thing. We control the clock, keep the opposing offense off the field and run it down people's throat. Works great against the vast majority of teams. When you face teams with as much or more talent -- they tear your defense to shreds. Go look at North Carolina's defenses and what that offense did to them. North Carolina can recruit better than Wisconsin too.

I can tell you this -- Wisconsin games will be much more fun to watch. Not sure their fan base is going to enjoy them though. Michigan scored a ton with Rich Rod, but our games ended up looking like video game scores.
 
Your last comment is exactly why Wisconsin will be completely different. Let him recruit his guys in. That means going away from what made Wisconsin what it was. A grind it out team that ate up the play clock and wore defenses down, while their defense got to rest of the sideline.

I'm an expert when it comes to this because Michigan does the EXACT same thing. We control the clock, keep the opposing offense off the field and run it down people's throat. Works great against the vast majority of teams. When you face teams with as much or more talent -- they tear your defense to shreds. Go look at North Carolina's defenses and what that offense did to them. North Carolina can recruit better than Wisconsin too.

I can tell you this -- Wisconsin games will be much more fun to watch. Not sure their fan base is going to enjoy them though. Michigan scored a ton with Rich Rod, but our games ended up looking like video game scores.
Are you going to completely gloss over the part about UNC running the ball much more than they passed it and producing 3 different 1,000+ yard rushers in 4 years? That's sort of a big deal in this conversation. UNC had more seasons under Longo where they weren't even top 50 in the nation in pass attempts than they did being even top 30, so I wouldn't expect him to suddenly change that. If anything, he's going to bring experience developing coherent passing attacks that also focus a lot on the run. On average in his 4 years, UNC was 55th in the nation in time of possession, so it's nothing outlandish. Again, I strongly disagree that he runs a traditional "air raid" offense.

Also I'm not sure which team you were watching when Rich Rod was your coach, but it wasn't michigan. The best you ever were under him was 25th in the nation in PPG.
 
Are you going to completely gloss over the part about UNC running the ball much more than they passed it and producing 3 different 1,000+ yard rushers in 4 years? That's sort of a big deal in this conversation. UNC had more seasons under Longo where they weren't even top 50 in the nation in pass attempts than they did being even top 30, so I wouldn't expect him to suddenly change that. If anything, he's going to bring experience developing coherent passing attacks that also focus a lot on the run. On average in his 4 years, UNC was 55th in the nation in time of possession, so it's nothing outlandish. Again, I strongly disagree that he runs a traditional "air raid" offense.

Also I'm not sure which team you were watching when Rich Rod was your coach, but it wasn't michigan. The best you ever were under him was 25th in the nation in PPG.

I was gonna say, there were a few games where Michigan had some video game scores under Rich Rod. The multiple OT game vs Illinois and that comical Delaware State game, but other than that Rich Rod's offenses were wildly mediocre-average at best. Even in his 3rd and final season Michigan was held under 30 points 7 times, with their biggest outputs being against Umass Bowling Green Indiana & Illinois.
 
Are you going to completely gloss over the part about UNC running the ball much more than they passed it and producing 3 different 1,000+ yard rushers in 4 years? That's sort of a big deal in this conversation. UNC had more seasons under Longo where they weren't even top 50 in the nation in pass attempts than they did being even top 30, so I wouldn't expect him to suddenly change that. If anything, he's going to bring experience developing coherent passing attacks that also focus a lot on the run. On average in his 4 years, UNC was 55th in the nation in time of possession, so it's nothing outlandish. Again, I strongly disagree that he runs a traditional "air raid" offense.

Also I'm not sure which team you were watching when Rich Rod was your coach, but it wasn't michigan. The best you ever were under him was 25th in the nation in PPG.

Also, I guess most offenses will look like a "Air Raid" when compared to Wisconsin the last 30 years.
 
I was gonna say, there were a few games where Michigan had some video game scores under Rich Rod. The multiple OT game vs Illinois and that comical Delaware State game, but other than that Rich Rod's offenses were wildly mediocre-average at best. Even in his 3rd and final season Michigan was held under 30 points 7 times, with their biggest outputs being against Umass Bowling Green Indiana & Illinois.
Yeah his offense never worked in the Big Ten. That 2010 season was the year they finished 25th in the nation in scoring and played 13 games. Over half of their points all season came in those 4 games you mentioned.
 
Your last comment is exactly why Wisconsin will be completely different. Let him recruit his guys in. That means going away from what made Wisconsin what it was. A grind it out team that ate up the play clock and wore defenses down, while their defense got to rest of the sideline.

I'm an expert when it comes to this because Michigan does the EXACT same thing. We control the clock, keep the opposing offense off the field and run it down people's throat. Works great against the vast majority of teams. When you face teams with as much or more talent -- they tear your defense to shreds. Go look at North Carolina's defenses and what that offense did to them. North Carolina can recruit better than Wisconsin too.

I can tell you this -- Wisconsin games will be much more fun to watch. Not sure their fan base is going to enjoy them though. Michigan scored a ton with Rich Rod, but our games ended up looking like video game scores.
I don't think Wisconsin's D will change that much. Yes, PPGA may go up but that will be due to # of possessions, as you say. I don't think that Mordecai is the Second coming of Russell Wison, but he is a huge upgrade to Mertz. Transfers into the WR room is a huge improvement. Will we score 40 per game? No but mid 30s is not out of the question.
 
I was gonna say, there were a few games where Michigan had some video game scores under Rich Rod. The multiple OT game vs Illinois and that comical Delaware State game, but other than that Rich Rod's offenses were wildly mediocre-average at best. Even in his 3rd and final season Michigan was held under 30 points 7 times, with their biggest outputs being against Umass Bowling Green Indiana & Illinois.
Without a doubt -- Michigan was TERRIBLE under Rich Rod. If I made it sound like Rich Rod was great for us -- That definitely isn't what I was trying to say. We were TERRIBLE and he brought in all the guys to fit his offense, which mean smaller skill position guys, smaller OL, smaller defensive linemen. He failed miserably and that set Michigan back for years and is one of the reasons, why for a decade, we struggled.
 
Yeah his offense never worked in the Big Ten. That 2010 season was the year they finished 25th in the nation in scoring and played 13 games. Over half of their points all season came in those 4 games you mentioned.

I don't think his offensive system is the blame, more of how he implemented it and how he recruited.

He was still recruiting like he was at West Virginia, that's not gonna work at a place like Michigan.

The DEFENSE he brought in really did not work in the B1G at the time however. That was the bigger downfall than the offense.
 
I don't think Wisconsin's D will change that much. Yes, PPGA may go up but that will be due to # of possessions, as you say. I don't think that Mordecai is the Second coming of Russell Wison, but he is a huge upgrade to Mertz. Transfers into the WR room is a huge improvement. Will we score 40 per game? No but mid 30s is not out of the question.
I said the same thing with Michigan. It will change, especially if you are using a hurry up on huddle type of offense, as those defensive players Wisconsin signed in the past will look elsewhere. Defensive players want little to do with teams using hurry up no huddle offenses, as it looks great on the scoreboard for the offense, but it breaks a defense down.

It is just my opinion, and I could be wrong, but Wisconsin has enough issues recruiting because of the area they are in. They are going away from what was successful for them and it seems like they are trying to force a square peg into a round hole.
 
I don't think his offensive system is the blame, more of how he implemented it and how he recruited.

He was still recruiting like he was at West Virginia, that's not gonna work at a place like Michigan.

The DEFENSE he brought in really did not work in the B1G at the time however. That was the bigger downfall than the offense.
The downfall is -- the defense was on the field all game long. That is the issue with the hurry up no huddle spread.
 
I said the same thing with Michigan. It will change, especially if you are using a hurry up on huddle type of offense, as those defensive players Wisconsin signed in the past will look elsewhere. Defensive players want little to do with teams using hurry up no huddle offenses, as it looks great on the scoreboard for the offense, but it breaks a defense down.

It is just my opinion, and I could be wrong, but Wisconsin has enough issues recruiting because of the area they are in. They are going away from what was successful for them and it seems like they are trying to force a square peg into a round hole.
Again, are you going to keep ignoring the fact that UNC ran much more often than they threw under Longo? Or that they were actually on average right around the middle of the FBS, if not in the top half of teams in terms of TOP?
 
I said the same thing with Michigan. It will change, especially if you are using a hurry up on huddle type of offense, as those defensive players Wisconsin signed in the past will look elsewhere. Defensive players want little to do with teams using hurry up no huddle offenses, as it looks great on the scoreboard for the offense, but it breaks a defense down.

It is just my opinion, and I could be wrong, but Wisconsin has enough issues recruiting because of the area they are in. They are going away from what was successful for them and it seems like they are trying to force a square peg into a round hole.
I think recruiting depends on the first 2 years. If Wisky can get back to 9, 10, or heaven forbid, 11 wins, the recruits will be there. But, as always, QB is a weakness going forward. Fix that and we'll be OK. Coach Dad bet his career on Mertz and lost. I am an optimistic fan but enough of a realist to understand we are starting behind but so far I think Fickell is doing a helluva job.
 
Are you going to completely gloss over the part about UNC running the ball much more than they passed it and producing 3 different 1,000+ yard rushers in 4 years? That's sort of a big deal in this conversation. UNC had more seasons under Longo where they weren't even top 50 in the nation in pass attempts than they did being even top 30, so I wouldn't expect him to suddenly change that. If anything, he's going to bring experience developing coherent passing attacks that also focus a lot on the run. On average in his 4 years, UNC was 55th in the nation in time of possession, so it's nothing outlandish. Again, I strongly disagree that he runs a traditional "air raid" offense.

Also I'm not sure which team you were watching when Rich Rod was your coach, but it wasn't michigan. The best you ever were under him was 25th in the nation in PPG.
I could be wrong, but to me, the last place you want to implement any type of spread, high tempo offense is in an area of the country where you lack those type of athletes. So who knows? I guess we will see. If I thought really hard, I'm sure i've been wrong once a long time ago. :hammer:
 
I could be wrong, but to me, the last place you want to implement any type of spread, high tempo offense is in an area of the country where you lack those type of athletes. So who knows? I guess we will see. If I thought really hard, I'm sure i've been wrong once a long time ago. :hammer:
Don't hurt yourself. :biggrin:
 
I think recruiting depends on the first 2 years. If Wisky can get back to 9, 10, or heaven forbid, 11 wins, the recruits will be there. But, as always, QB is a weakness going forward. Fix that and we'll be OK. Coach Dad bet his career on Mertz and lost. I am an optimistic fan but enough of a realist to understand we are starting behind but so far I think Fickell is doing a helluva job.
The toughest part for Wisconsin is going to be finding the skill position talent if they truly are going to open it up and go 4 or 5 wide. The elite skill position talent is usually in the South, Southwest, West. You have a handful in our recruiting footprint, but then you have to try and take those kids from schools like Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, which will be so hard to do.

Wisconsin had the right idea recruiting to their strengths, Will be interesting to see what the offense looks like next year. I shouldn't pass judgement until I see what it is they settle on running. I do hope for Wisconsin fans sake -- it looks nothing like the hurry up spread that Rich Rod put in at UM, as you won't recognize your team.:facepalm:
 
Gardner completely shut down half the field and the best WR on the other team. Teams didn't even throw it his way. When that happens, it allows your defense to dedicate itself to helping lock the other side down. To put it in perspective how little teams threw his way. He gave up 113 yards receiving FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR. There is a reason why one guy was drafted in the top 5 and the other CB was drafted in the 4th round. So yes -- Bryant won the Thorpe, but if you remove Gardner from Cincy -- they have a completely different defense and I would wager Bryant isn't winning anything, as he now has less help over the top, has to cover the top threat on the other team, etc.

Back to Wisconsin though -- Phil Longo is an air raid offensive coordinator, that is who they are bringing in. Wisconsin is going to be a completely different offense. With it, it will also change their defense. Why? Their defense will be on the field WAY more, as the offense won't be having 10+ minute drives running it down people's throat. They aren't going to be recruiting the same type of players. Look at when Rich Rod came to Michigan to run his offense -- they completely changed who they recruited on offense and defense. So saying Wisconsin will have elite this and that because they had it in the past means nothing when they will have an entire new philosophy on the offensive side of the ball.

I disagree with this. Longo isn't your traditional Air-Raid OC. His teams, on average, while the OC at Ole Miss and UNC, respectively, ran the ball more than threw the ball. Will it look different schematically from what they've done, yeah, but Longo's offenses like to run the ball. They have a quicker pace than Wisconsin traditionally has, but Wisconsin has always done offense at a turtle like pace. I can see it blowing up in Fickell's face or I could also see it raise their ceiling since they are a threat offensively now. I don't think Mordecai is the best QB fit for this offense, so this 2023 version might throw it more, but when he gets a QB in that can be a threat in the run game, that's when it takes the offense to a different level. But this isn't your typical Air-Raid offense. This isn't Texas Tech(before Wells) or Miss State levels.
 
The toughest part for Wisconsin is going to be finding the skill position talent if they truly are going to open it up and go 4 or 5 wide. The elite skill position talent is usually in the South, Southwest, West. You have a handful in our recruiting footprint, but then you have to try and take those kids from schools like Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, which will be so hard to do.

Wisconsin had the right idea recruiting to their strengths, Will be interesting to see what the offense looks like next year. I shouldn't pass judgement until I see what it is they settle on running. I do hope for Wisconsin fans sake -- it looks nothing like the hurry up spread that Rich Rod put in at UM, as you won't recognize your team.:facepalm:
I think the days of the 25 carry running back is over. Int fact, it would not surprise me if Chaz Mellusi becomes the lead RB.
 
Back
Top