Mel Tucker Accused Of Sexually Harassing A Sexual Assault Survivor

ralphiewvu said:
Fuck No, me ether.

aint nobody got time for that GIF
Click to expand...
Just looked.

Since the 4th of July I’ve answered the phone twice when the lil lady called. Twice I didn’t answer.

We’ll text each other from different rooms of the house though. That way shits on record, see, I told you I told you.
 
Dantonio coming back is just further proof to my mostly fact/theory, that he was blackmailed into retiring. He’s still being blackmailed to help out now.

Secrets, secrets, are no fun.
 
broncosmitty said:
Dantonio coming back is just further proof to my mostly fact/theory, that he was blackmailed into retiring. He’s still being blackmailed to help out now.

Secrets, secrets, are no fun.
Click to expand...
Yeah I’m starting to think this chick ain’t all innocent in this. 27 calls in a years time , 30 mins a pop?
 
ralphiewvu said:
Yeah I’m starting to think this chick ain’t all innocent in this. 27 calls in a years time , 30 mins a pop?
Click to expand...
Quite frankly, it seems like a he said/she said thing. But I can absolutely see someone having a non-sexual relationship that was somewhat inappropriate (for a married guy), continuing to contact said person and Mel taking that consensual relationship and turning it creepy by jacking off over the phone without her consent. That seems more plausible here. He took her continued contact as an open door to be a creep and whack it over the phone.

Either way, MSU now has cause to fire him and get out of that contract because of the situation. There's some clause about not doing anything that could be embarrassing for the University and I suspect this qualifies on all fronts. I don't know how he'd ever recover from this at the school.

Could she be lying? Yes. But either way this situation is embarrassing for the school and harms the program.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Quite frankly, it seems like a he said/she said thing. But I can absolutely see someone having a non-sexual relationship that was somewhat inappropriate (for a married guy), continuing to contact said person and Mel taking that consensual relationship and turning it creepy by jacking off over the phone without her consent. That seems more plausible here. He took her continued contact as an open door to be a creep and whack it over the phone.

Either way, MSU now has cause to fire him and get out of that contract because of the situation. There's some clause about not doing anything that could be embarrassing for the University and I suspect this qualifies on all fronts. I don't know how he'd ever recover from this at the school.

Could she be lying? Yes. But either way this situation is embarrassing for the school and harms the program.
Click to expand...
That's probably exactly what happened. They had a working relationship that went a little further, he read that as her opening the door for some kind of affair and thought his best course of action was to jerk it over the phone, it freaked her out, from there he went all in on the creepiness with sending gifts and stuff.

I guess she could be lying, but about what really? He admits to doing it... Probably a good lesson in if you want to escalate a relationship (in general, but especially with someone involved with work), be really damn sure they're on the same page and want that extra attention. Also, if you're married, maybe just focus on that relationship.
 
DayButtAssMans’s said:
That's probably exactly what happened. They had a working relationship that went a little further, he read that as her opening the door for some kind of affair and thought his best course of action was to jerk it over the phone, it freaked her out, from there he went all in on the creepiness with sending gifts and stuff.

I guess she could be lying, but about what really? He admits to doing it... Probably a good lesson in if you want to escalate a relationship (in general, but especially with someone involved with work), be really damn sure they're on the same page and want that extra attention. Also, if you're married, maybe just focus on that relationship.
Click to expand...
The fact that he lied to the Title IX investigator and tried to pay her off, really doesn't help his innocence
 
This would have never happened with John L. Williams
 
ralphiewvu said:
Yeah I’m starting to think this chick ain’t all innocent in this. 27 calls in a years time , 30 mins a pop?
Click to expand...
Going kinda old foagie here, but she didn't seem to mind that he was a married man
 
BTW, State should hire Paul Chryst by Christmas.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Quite frankly, it seems like a he said/she said thing. But I can absolutely see someone having a non-sexual relationship that was somewhat inappropriate (for a married guy), continuing to contact said person and Mel taking that consensual relationship and turning it creepy by jacking off over the phone without her consent. That seems more plausible here. He took her continued contact as an open door to be a creep and whack it over the phone.

Either way, MSU now has cause to fire him and get out of that contract because of the situation. There's some clause about not doing anything that could be embarrassing for the University and I suspect this qualifies on all fronts. I don't know how he'd ever recover from this at the school.

Could she be lying? Yes. But either way this situation is embarrassing for the school and harms the program.
Click to expand...
It absolutely hurts the university and program. And your scenario is plausible. But 27 times on the phone for 30 minutes a pop? That seems a little sketchy to be claiming he suddenly came onto her whacking it on the phone one time. Plus he’s still claiming it was consensual.
 
ralphiewvu said:
It absolutely hurts the university and program. And your scenario is plausible. But 27 times on the phone for 30 minutes a pop? That seems a little sketchy to be claiming he suddenly came onto her whacking it on the phone one time. Plus he’s still claiming it was consensual.
Click to expand...
But this was over a pretty long period of time, a time in which she was working as a consultant with the University and doing multiple talks on campus. So It's not totally unusual. The thing that makes him seem guilty is lying to the investigator and then trying to pay her off.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
But this was over a pretty long period of time, a time in which she was working as a consultant with the University and doing multiple talks on campus. So It's not totally unusual. The thing that makes him seem guilty is lying to the investigator and then trying to pay her off.
Click to expand...
This is what I don't get with some of the responses... He's already been caught lying about the situation and apparently trying to bribe his way out of it. Some hoopla posters: "yeah... she's probably lying though"

What is that...
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
But this was over a pretty long period of time, a time in which she was working as a consultant with the University and doing multiple talks on campus. So It's not totally unusual. The thing that makes him seem guilty is lying to the investigator and then trying to pay her off.
Click to expand...
It was over the course of a year according to the article I linked, that’s a little less then every two weeks, for a 30 minute phone call? A consultant for the university? She visited MSU 3 times, one of those was to be honored at a spring game. Again your scenario is plausible but not the only plausible one. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle and again Tucker is still claiming it was consensual.

Ohh and lol at your little cheerleader ignoring one side of this because reasons???
 
Let’s just address the elephant in the room here..

He banged that white girl FR not just over the phone. I ain’t hatin on the man, that’s an urge/temptation that’s bigger than all of us but…
If/when ya give in to it, theys consequences.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top