I wouldn't say he supported Michigan lol. He said yeah sign stealing happens and then implied that it's done when teams across the field are looking at you. He didn't agree with sending scouts to games to film and steal signs that way.
Yeah see, it's only michigan fans that bring that up. Those were never used as excuses, but desperate michigan fans who have had their asses handed to them for the majority of their lives cling to those things. Fact is the rest of college football knows you needed to resort to cheating to try and get to our level. And with all of that cheating, we're still closer to winning a title. Sorry, nothing you say changes anything I just said.
LOL always has been
The record vs. the rest of the conference made the same drastic change. However its weird that their bowl game record didnt improve. Its almost as if they didnt have time to get the signs from those teams before the bowl game.
Weird. An ohio state fan again.
Michigan by all accounts made massive changes. We fired basically everyone on staff, including long time Harbaugh assistants.
And also promoted the guy who was blatantly cheating for your advantage. Don't forget that part.
minor violation at worst, teams commit those regularly. OSU committed something like 12 just last year.
I mean, it's a far bigger issue of unethical behavior than any "minor violations", regardless of if MnB is unable to admit it. The minor violations OSU, michigan, and every other school has had in the past are usually self-reported and the NCAA doesn't even do an investigation, so it's not comparable.
Hardly. If sign stealing at it's core was illegal, then this would be a much bigger issue. As is, in person scouting only gives you a minor advantage to the already prevalent sign stealing methods that currently exist (which apparently includes teams trading information with each other). Which would pretty literally be a version of in person scouting if talking to teams your opponents have already faced.
So Michigan in essence caught themselves cheating. That would also mean the leaders at the University made the decision not protect the football staff and are actually saying they are not a “Football school” and are foremost an institution of higher education and conference/national championships be damned. Doesn’t that make you feel good @MAIZEandBLUE09?
What you just quoted is not true. The outside firm was not in fact something associated with the University or investigating something else, stumbling upon this information.
1. How do you know this?
LOL ... there are all sorts of things that you can point at as to why we might not repeat, but our QB isn't one of them. We are a very good team, but not Elite. It's almost as if you don't know anything about UGA football.
