Michigan yanks Harbaugh's contract extension

It is so funny to see you not only have excuses for OSU, but also excuses for teams OSU struggles with when they get manhandled by a lesser team (Louisville) and struggle with a basketball school (Duke). :pound:

My question for you is -- Stalion won't be there this year. What will your excuse be when Michigan does the exact same thing to OSU they have done the last two years? I can't wait to hear it.
LOL ND is ranked 12th peabrain. It's lightyears better than any win michigan has this year, so what are you even spouting off about? If you're going to rip ND for beating Duke with their QB fully healthy on the road in primetime, where are your posts ripping on FSU at home for losing to Duke with Riley playing injured and only winning once he went out for the game?

My question for you is what have you seen at all this year that would suggest michigan is going to do what they've done the last two years? I mean, you tell everyone on here how they don't "know football", so break it down for us.
 
Don't put me in MnB group. I think Michigan should be punished and what Stalions did not only ignorant, but was illegal. If Harbaugh knew about it, he should absolutely be fired.

That being said -- ATF has excuses for EVERYTHING for OSU. Truth of the matter is -- the sign stealing had little to nothing to do with anything Michigan has done the last two years. Teams steal signs weekly. Teams change signs weekly. UM beat OSU the last two years because OSU can't stop UM's offense. 1,000 yards of offense over the last two years by UM against OSU is why we have won.

I just have fun listening to ATF come up with new excuses though.

I've not offered excuses but we seem to forget last year was a one score game with 7 minutes to go. The score got lopsided no doubt though. Credit to Michigan for doing so.
 
Jim Harbaugh to losers in this thread
 
LMAO that you think that wasn't done many moons ago on this board
That'd be like grouping you in with the logical OSU fans. You are in a group of your own, as is MnB. It is why the two of you need your own thread.
 
lol


The media thanks you for it's clicks again
 

lol at OSU fans hoping Harbaugh goes away

It's really no big deal for them to extend him - - -

Either this is a big nothing burger, or

It's a big problem, which will cause the BOR to fire him for cause and they won't have to pay him a penny.

I just was laughing at the blatant attempt to get people to pay for the information that is available for free in many places.

First month is a $1, but next month, it's 10 times that, and cancelling is a nightmare.
 
It's really no big deal for them to extend him - - -

Either this is a big nothing burger, or

It's a big problem, which will cause the BOR to fire him for cause and they won't have to pay him a penny.

I just was laughing at the blatant attempt to get people to pay for the information that is available for free in many places.

First month is a $1, but next month, it's 10 times that, and cancelling is a nightmare.
 
LOL ND is ranked 12th peabrain. It's lightyears better than any win michigan has this year, so what are you even spouting off about? If you're going to rip ND for beating Duke with their QB fully healthy on the road in primetime, where are your posts ripping on FSU at home for losing to Duke with Riley playing injured and only winning once he went out for the game?

My question for you is what have you seen at all this year that would suggest michigan is going to do what they've done the last two years? I mean, you tell everyone on here how they don't "know football", so break it down for us.
Other than the fact Michigan returns almost everyone on offense from the team who did it last year to OSU? Not much.

OSU looks improved on defense. They are #2 in scoring defense at 10 ppg. The #1 team? Michigan at 5.9 ppg. OSU has only given up 160 yard passing per game, which is great. Michigan only gives up 140. OSU only gives up 100 yards rushing per game, which is good. Michigan only gives up 85.

The biggest difference between the two teams this year. OSU doesn't have an elite QB, doesn't have an elite offense, even though they have the best WR group in all of CFB.

Is that broken down enough? Or do you need more?
 
It's really no big deal for them to extend him - - -

Either this is a big nothing burger, or

It's a big problem, which will cause the BOR to fire him for cause and they won't have to pay him a penny.

I just was laughing at the blatant attempt to get people to pay for the information that is available for free in many places.

First month is a $1, but next month, it's 10 times that, and cancelling is a nightmare.
Will never understand why anyone would waste money on people claiming to be insiders to give you information you can get for nothing. People are fools though and pay it.
 
This really means nothing IMO.

It gives them a bullshit "LOOK WE STAND BY OUR COACH!" grandstand, but in the end they can still fire him with cause and not have to pay a dime if the NCAA slams the hammer on them.
 
I've not offered excuses but we seem to forget last year was a one score game with 7 minutes to go. The score got lopsided no doubt though. Credit to Michigan for doing so.
Agree. The difference with this OSU team and the OSU teams the last two years is. OSU doesn't have an elite QB under center anymore. For the first time in decades -- Michigan will have the much better QB. On top of that -- UM returned 90% of their team from last year. Ronnie Bell is the only guy we lost on offense. Defensively -- Michigan is deeper at every position than they have been in as long as I can remember.
 
Other than the fact Michigan returns almost everyone on offense from the team who did it last year to OSU? Not much.

OSU looks improved on defense. They are #2 in scoring defense at 10 ppg. The #1 team? Michigan at 5.9 ppg. OSU has only given up 160 yard passing per game, which is great. Michigan only gives up 140. OSU only gives up 100 yards rushing per game, which is good. Michigan only gives up 85.

The biggest difference between the two teams this year. OSU doesn't have an elite QB, doesn't have an elite offense, even though they have the best WR group in all of CFB.

Is that broken down enough? Or do you need more?

The best team Michigan has played so far is probably Rutgers...
 
Agree. The difference with this OSU team and the OSU teams the last two years is. OSU doesn't have an elite QB under center anymore. For the first time in decades -- Michigan will have the much better QB. On top of that -- UM returned 90% of their team from last year. Ronnie Bell is the only guy we lost on offense. Defensively -- Michigan is deeper at every position than they have been in as long as I can remember.

gonna be a tough game
 
Other than the fact Michigan returns almost everyone on offense from the team who did it last year to OSU? Not much.

OSU looks improved on defense. They are #2 in scoring defense at 10 ppg. The #1 team? Michigan at 5.9 ppg. OSU has only given up 160 yard passing per game, which is great. Michigan only gives up 140. OSU only gives up 100 yards rushing per game, which is good. Michigan only gives up 85.

The biggest difference between the two teams this year. OSU doesn't have an elite QB, doesn't have an elite offense, even though they have the best WR group in all of CFB.

Is that broken down enough? Or do you need more?
Well as usual you said nothing that supports your thoughts. What I'm hearing is OSU has very comparable metrics to michigan despite playing an exponentially more difficult schedule. Somehow McCarthy is a "much better QB" despite having similar output as McCord against a schedule that's not even comparable, while your offense averaged 1 TD more per game against said middle school schedule.

OSU having a healthy WR room with Emeka back will make a big difference, as will having Henderson. McCord will have to be sharp but if we're healthy I'm not worried. Meanwhile nothing about michigan's offense is scary compared to our defense.
 
Back
Top