- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 6,039
- Bookie:
- $ 12,463.00

So no one has ever beat a #1 team unless that team lost at some point and still ended up #1 at the end of the season.
Didn't LSU finish #1 with 2 losses in 2007?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So no one has ever beat a #1 team unless that team lost at some point and still ended up #1 at the end of the season.
I never said that. I said that you should get credit for beating a team at their current ranking. Less credit for beating a team early in the season that is ranked than you would a team ranked late, but you can't just dismiss it because the ranking BEFORE YOU BEAT THEM is going to be higher than after.
I don't disagree with your last statement, and I don't care what ESPN or the SEC claims, nor do I think B1G has a never done it trying to justify a BCS bid.At the END OF THE SEASON when everyone is arguing strength of schedule, you should not be claiming those types of wins as "great wins".But the shills on ESPN sure will for the SEC teams like always. They'll hype USC as a "good loss" for LSU too.
If the "Top 10" team you beat in week 2 finishes unranked they clearly weren't ever any good.
I don't disagree with your last statement, and I don't care what ESPN or the SEC claims, nor do I think B1G has a never done it trying to justify a BCS bid.
But to flatly say that gameday rankings don't matter is pants on head fucking retarded and y'all are lining up to agree with that bullshit. Assuming OSU doesn't completely fold and ends up in the top 5, does Oregon not get credit for beating the #2 ranked team? Just because by having beat them they knocked them down a few spots and only worked their way back up to #4?
I don't understand that. You say gameday rankings do matter, but the only ranking that matters is at the end of the season. What am I not getting?I never said that the gameday rankings that week don't matter, obviously they do. But the only rankings that matter at the end of the year are the final ranking.
Getting rid of preseason rankings would help filter out the bullshit, no rankings period until the CFP starts pushing theirs out. Of course that would never happen though. I think after 7 or 8 weeks you get a much better view of how teams actually are than some arbitrary preseason rankings based off of assumptions and past seasons in a sport that more than ever wildly varies from year to year.
I don't understand that. You say gameday rankings do matter, but the only ranking that matters is at the end of the season. What am I not getting?
Yes, preseason rankings are stupid and should be ignored. Yes, until about week 5 we should ignore rankings for the most part. But the outright "only the SEC counts rankings on the week they play and that's stupid" stuff is fucking ignorant.
And all the fucking tards that wrote, liked, or "he's right you know" gif'd that moronic "GameDay Rankings are worthless" post need to be castrated and removed from the fucking gene pool. Inbred fucking hillbilly dildos.
I’m hoping for chaos, mixed up disaster, etc so we can listen to all the arguments as to how the CFP got it wrong.I will say this: MEN, NOVEMBER COLLEGE FOOTBALL IS ALMOST HERE!!! Now, the scary part is I have no idea if it is going to separate the great from the good and the good from the bad. Or is it just going to make it more of a mixed up disaster? I hope major injuries don't come into play.
And look at the teams in the P4 conferences that have no losses, and the ones sitting behind them with just one loss. I can see a major shitstorm coming and a lot of bitching about which team(s) got left out just behind the 12th spot.
I'd say they get credit for beating a top 5 team, but not the #2 team unless OSU ends up ranked #2.I don't disagree with your last statement, and I don't care what ESPN or the SEC claims, nor do I think B1G has a never done it trying to justify a BCS bid.
But to flatly say that gameday rankings don't matter is pants on head fucking retarded and y'all are lining up to agree with that bullshit. Assuming OSU doesn't completely fold and ends up in the top 5, does Oregon not get credit for beating the #2 ranked team? Just because by having beat them they knocked them down a few spots and only worked their way back up to #4?
There's a chance the acc and b1g finish with 3 teams undefeated in conference playI’m hoping for chaos, mixed up disaster, etc so we can listen to all the arguments as to how the CFP got it wrong.
Yep.Didn't LSU finish #1 with 2 losses in 2007?
And in some cases, the first tie breaker doesn't work. Teams haven't played each other.There's a chance the acc and b1g finish with 3 teams undefeated in conference play
If they win games, not at all.How much does that LSU loss to the Trojans affect them? I mean, it was week one (I think).
Well, November started, and that “mixed up disaster” didn’t take long…I will say this: MEN, NOVEMBER COLLEGE FOOTBALL IS ALMOST HERE!!! Now, the scary part is I have no idea if it is going to separate the great from the good and the good from the bad. Or is it just going to make it more of a mixed up disaster? I hope major injuries don't come into play.
And look at the teams in the P4 conferences that have no losses, and the ones sitting behind them with just one loss. I can see a major shitstorm coming and a lot of bitching about which team(s) got left out just behind the 12th spot.