Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
UK just isn't that talented. They have 2 high level recruits in Boston and Clarke, but after that not another top 30 FR. Sarr is a good big, but I don't think he's an NBA guy or anything.
It's tough to count on guys ranked 30-70 as true FR to try and win games. Plus they are not getting anything out of Toppin or Mintz.
It's hard to rely on a ton of freshmen. If you are going to take that ballsy approach, you better have 4-5 top 20 guys.
referring to Sarr's rating out of HS is weird, because this is his fourth year in college. He averaged 14 PPG/9 RPG on a 53% FG last year in the ACC. He's a traitor that needs to be fed to a pack of wild animals, but he's still a good player.Yeah the only 2 predominantly FR teams to win titles in the 1 and done era were UK 2012 and Duke 2015. Duke had the #1(Okafor), #8(Jones), #13(Winslow) and #25(Allen) as FR. As a whole, higher regarded than this UK class. But they also had Quinn Cook, Matt Jones and Amile Jefferson who were top 40 kids out of high school and were a senior, sophomore and junior, respectively. UK's upperclassmen consist of a 3 star transfer from Wake Forest, an unrated player from Rhode Island who was a backup and a 3 star from Creighton who avg 10 ppg as a junior there. They just done have the elite FR, or the experience of really talent players. I think they'll probably be somewhere between where their 2013 team and 2014 teams were. Which was an NIT team and then the 2014 team was an 8 seed(in their defense they did make the title game, but they weren't a good regular season team). That team had much better FR though IMO.
referring to Sarr's rating out of HS is weird, because this is his fourth year in college. He averaged 14 PPG/9 RPG on a 53% FG last year in the ACC. He's a traitor that needs to be fed to a pack of wild animals, but he's still a good player.
This year , maybe more than any other in my 43 years , I think upperclassmen and experience will be huge. Given how this season will likely involve stops and starts , twists and turns, unexpected shit on short notice etc youre going to need mental toughness and players who can deal with all of the unknown
I was actually thinking more about mid major type teams ( like Richmond ) since thats who the thread is about lol. But I will happily accept Iowa being awesome tooMeaning ... Iowa is going to be awesome? Lol.
It seems true. Nova lost their best player so their expectations were based who was expected to be healthy and step up. And so far, injuries and the same players bricking layups and only being spot up shooters despite being Top 50 rectuirs.
I also thought TBH Gonzaga's ranking was high because they lost a shitload. But their guys have stepped up.
Ugh. 2015. That was the nearly undefeated team.Yeah the only 2 predominantly FR teams to win titles in the 1 and done era were UK 2012 and Duke 2015. Duke had the #1(Okafor), #8(Jones), #13(Winslow) and #25(Allen) as FR. As a whole, higher regarded than this UK class. But they also had Quinn Cook, Matt Jones and Amile Jefferson who were top 40 kids out of high school and were a senior, sophomore and junior, respectively. UK's upperclassmen consist of a 3 star transfer from Wake Forest, an unrated player from Rhode Island who was a backup and a 3 star from Creighton who avg 10 ppg as a junior there. They just done have the elite FR, or the experience of really talent players. I think they'll probably be somewhere between where their 2013 team and 2014 teams were. Which was an NIT team and then the 2014 team was an 8 seed(in their defense they did make the title game, but they weren't a good regular season team). That team had much better FR though IMO.
Ugh. 2015. That was the nearly undefeated team.