Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Problems for me....John Clark was white, and would be about 70-75 now. The novel is set around 1969-70ish.
That’s a good point. I should check these out. Still haven’t seen the new reboots like Jack Ryan. Just need to get out of stubborn old ways.I'm pretty sure the setting is going to be moved to the present-day as was done with the John Krasinski Jack Ryan TV series. In fact, given that they're both being done by Amazon, I suspect they're both going to be set in the same continuity to allow for a future crossover and to start building a shared universe if the film is successful.
So we’re NOT going to see him torture a drug dealer in a decompression chamber? That sucks.Ok, on the one hand I’m glad someone is finally taking John Clark’s origin story forward. On the other hand....about the only link to the novel is his name and that his wife was killed (sort of)
Problems for me....John Clark was white, and would be about 70-75 now. The novel is set around 1969-70ish. His pregnant wife does die in a car accident. After that he picks up a girl hitching. Ends up taking on with her. Finds that she was a prostitute in Baltimore and has been through some whacked shit. Gets her clean and clear of it all. With her new clarity she decides she needs to help take these bad guys down. He screws up on an inner city recon with her and gets her killed.
He goes off the deep end and sets about taking all the bad guys down in a style that is part Bronson, part Bourne. Bad guys are pulling in heroin from Vietnam in dead soldiers and making a killing. He takes it all down, and is about to get caught when a CIA handler he worked some jobs with grabs him ahead of the police. John Kelly becomes John Clark. And John Clark is a bad ass.
I want to see THAT movie.
They could have stayed true to the book without telling the “Billy on the barometric chamber” scene.That said I’ve been clamoring for a movie based off that book for a while. Not a big fan of retooling the story just for the diversity hire.
Young Alec Baldwin did a good job. But outgrew the part.They could have stayed true to the book without telling the “Billy on the barometric chamber” scene.
They took too long getting this on the screen in any form. Now a days it has to be a diversity hire. They still could have set it in 1970 though. Being......diverse.....he could have easily stayed undercover on the streets of Baltimore.
This just feels like Affleck and that abomination of Sum of All Fears. Another good book that wasn’t told right. Or maybe I just have issue with anyone but Ford playing Ryan.
I liked Baldwin in HFRO a lot. It was slightly jarring when Ford took over, but it went away quickly as I felt that Ford was actually better at playing Ryan (regardless of what the cantankerous old author thought).Young Alec Baldwin did a good job. But outgrew the part.
Fun fact, Clancy hated Ford’s performance as Jack Ryan.
The problem with the Sum of All Fears was, if you’re world building, you don’t fuck up the timeline like that. Also, changing the villains from. ME terrorists to white supremacists was hacky.
Trailer:
Good point. Even if they had done the proper movie of this book right it would have disappointed. There is never substitute for how one can imagine it in their mind.I make it a habit to avoid watching a movie of a book I have read.
They almost always disappoint.
I will read a book after watching the movie, however.