Who gets banned first?

time travel tardis GIF by Doctor Who
 
You know what I don't miss?

Losing money providing a free message board, and being called a motherfucker, Nazi, cocksucker, or many other degrading names for doing it.

Other than that owning a message board is great.
This really deserves the "up yours!" rating, for old time's sake.
 
One of the dates on the way back machine has Straw's "I barely survived a bank robbery that happened when I wasn't there" thread. Shame you couldn't get into that one.

:rip: The Straw.

GOAT of idiotic arguments.

I did admire his dedication to refusing to admit he was wrong.
 
GOAT of idiotic arguments.

I did admire his dedication to refusing to admit he was wrong.
.500 record = winning season
More people playing the lottery reduces your odds of winning
The US won the 1950 World Cup in soccer

He was definitely unique.
 
.500 record = winning season
More people playing the lottery reduces your odds of winning
The US won the 1950 World Cup in soccer

He was definitely unique.

the static odds...STATIC
 
They were both being complete tools, so maybe they did.

Or maybe they just lean towards being complete tools.

lol, they all claim you’re the tool. Stats don’t lie
 
You're aware you listed 3 names and then the catchall "others" thing, right?

"We banned roughly 1% of our users! Everyone else was free to call everything "homo" and "gay" and so on."

I mean, for fucks sake, S-B didn't even have a PF and there was still perpetual personal attacks and other bullshit. The people who got banned went into the "4chan" category, the stuff that goes on here was allowed to marinate.
usually you got banned for actual sports talk.

I am sure TJD was borderline a lot of the time, but also because I think Vegas or Fish hated him. But she was able to stir the pot hard over there.

and if you got into it with the Cardinal fans, you are on Fish's list.
 
Because I knew it wasn't "the next 4chan" like ill seems to be worried about this site becoming. The Admin board had it's watchdog thread where certain nutjobs were monitored, but outside of the people you mentioned and Hammerdo...I mean, beareezy, it was just a bunch of middle aged dudes talking sportsball and calling each other the gayz from time to time, like here. The nutjob count between S-B and here are probably pretty similar.
this isn't black and white. There is plenty of grey area, you halfwit.
 
this isn't black and white. There is plenty of grey area, you halfwit.

No it's pretty black and white. A little bit of social awareness goes a long ways.
 
it's not at all black and white.

it all comes down to what Hammer wants to be the line.
You realize those two statements are completely contradictory, right?
 
You realize those two statements are completely contradictory, right?
right now, there is one person here with the ability to ban people here.

what he bans for and who he bans is totally at his discretion. If he says "I don't like racism, but it's so and so, so I will let it slide" that's up to him.

Same went for S-B.

Right now, there are no absolutes on this forum on what will get you banned.

and it has always been a sliding scale.
 
right now, there is one person here with the ability to ban people here.

what he bans for and who he bans is totally at his discretion. If he says "I don't like racism, but it's so and so, so I will let it slide" that's up to him.

Same went for S-B.

Right now, there are no absolutes on this forum on what will get you banned.

and it has always been a sliding scale.

Same went for S-B? We had a bunch of Admins and SMods.

I'm assuming the rules are pretty similar to that, but it appears they are even more lax here though because as I said in the Deli thread, there are certain posters who contribute absolutely nothing of value, but are still here.

So take S-B and make it more rebellious, but not quite 4chan?
 
Same went for S-B? We had a bunch of Admins and SMods.

I'm assuming the rules are pretty similar to that, but it appears they are even more lax here though because as I said in the Deli thread, there are certain posters who contribute absolutely nothing of value, but are still here.

So take S-B and make it more rebellious, but not quite 4chan?
anyone who got banned at SB still got reviewed by Fish. There is still a hierarchy on who makes that final call.

you don't think SB was pretty "rebellious"? There weren't many rules there.
 
anyone who got banned at SB still got reviewed by Fish. There is still a hierarchy on who makes that final call.

you don't think SB was pretty "rebellious"? There weren't many rules there.
Uhhhhhh, they weren't "reviewed by fish". Bannings were posted on the Admin board that only Admins/Smods had access to. It was reviewed by all of us.

And yes, there weren't many rules. It took a lot of effort to get banned there...
 
usually you got banned for actual sports talk.

I am sure TJD was borderline a lot of the time, but also because I think Vegas or Fish hated him. But she was able to stir the pot hard over there.

and if you got into it with the Cardinal fans, you are on Fish's list.
Feels are still hurt I see.

You do remember we had a report posts function, don't you? When an entire fanbase reports someone over and over we'd have to look at it.
Lose a troll or lose an entire board.
 
Feels are still hurt I see.

You do remember we had a report posts function, don't you? When an entire fanbase reports someone over and over we'd have to look at it.
Lose a troll or lose an entire board.
not at all.

you and I are friends now. Deal with it.

and the Cards fans were fun to troll :)
 
Back
Top