The 1960-1989 & 1990-2019 Two Team NFL Draft : CHAT

TheRobotDevil said:
You edited your original rankings post saying you didn’t use any metrics post 214. Not sure why you didn’t just edit your system you changed in post 214 rather than switching it to oops and writing the whole thing over lolz
Click to expand...
I edited the post
 
Last edited:
TheRobotDevil said:
People can do the same thing when you vote against them….They could do the same thing if they had someone vote against them in a previous draft….They could be influenced by another voters write up…I don’t believe anyone would do that. Nor do I believe they would based on rankings being posted. We are losing three teams directly to the rankings it is no different than our voting. Another form of voting at the least.We’ve always posted our votes the rankings are part of the voting process. No reason not to post both the same.
Click to expand...



Yeah all I get from that is glabba glabba gloop gloop
 
Yeah I pos
Nosferatu said:
Yeah all I get from that is glabba glabba gloop gloop
Click to expand...
When teams are eliminated rankings are part of the voting process.I posted my rankings during the voting. Before a vote was in when I didn’t see any rankings posted. I trust the judges to vote and not get mad or be influenced by rankings. If all you got was gabba gabba etc you’re choosing not to listen…. It’s simple when teams are eliminated through the rankings the rankings are a direct part of the voting process no reason they shouldn’t be posted no different than votes being posted….
 
TheRobotDevil said:
Yeah I pos

When teams are eliminated rankings are part of the voting process.I posted my rankings during the voting. Before a vote was in when I didn’t see any rankings posted. I trust the judges to vote and not get mad or be influenced by rankings. If all you got was gabba gabba etc you’re choosing not to listen…. It’s simple when teams are eliminated through the rankings the rankings are a direct part of the voting process no reason they shouldn’t be posted no different than votes being posted….
Click to expand...



If you can tell me why finding out the rankings prior to the playoff is in any way important I will agree with you until then glabba glabba gloop gloop.
 
Nosferatu said:
Great job in this draft fellas. I am going to take a little break. See y'all soon.

Rankings


NOS
1. Smitty - 1
2. Sushi - 2
3. 500 - 3
4. UK - 4
5. Milk - 5
6. Stoke - 6
7. Stakes - 7
8. Ducey - 8
9. Devil - 9
10. Nos - 10

SMITTY
Nos
Devil
Sushi
500
UK
Milk
Stoke
Stakes
Ducey
Smitty

UK
1. Ducey
2. Nos
3. Stoke
4. UK
5. Smitty
6. 500
7. Milk
8. Sushi
9. Stakes
10. Devil

STAKES
1. Smitty
2. 500
3. Devil
4. Nos
5. Stakes
6. UK
7. Sushi
8. Stoke
9. Milk
10. Ducey

STOKE
1. Stoke
2. Nos
3. Milk
4. Stakes
5. UK
6. Devil
7. Sushi
8. 500
9. Smitty
10. Ducey

DEVIL
1. Smitty
2. Stakes
3. Devil
4. Nos
5. Stoke
6. Ducey
7. UK
8. Milk
9. 500
10. Sushi

SUSHI
1. UK
2. Nos
3. Devil
4. 500
5. Sushi
6. Smitty
7. Milk
8. Stakes
9. Stoke
10. Ducey

500
1. UK
2. 500
3. Nos
4. Sushi
5. Stakes
6. Stoke
7. Milk
8. Devil
9. Smitty
10. Ducey

DUCEY
1. Nos
2. Devil
3. Smitty
4. Stoke
5. Sushi
6. Stakes
7. 500
8. Ducey
9. Milk
10. UK
Click to expand...
I had 2 overall firsts and a last lol
 
Nosferatu said:
If you can tell me why finding out the rankings prior to the playoff is in any way important I will agree with you until then glabba glabba gloop gloop.
Click to expand...
When three teams are eliminated it’s part of the voting process. I’m really not sure why you are getting agitated we posted the rankings last draft with no problems. If we aren’t posting rankings why bother posting votes and just post results after …. In the end rankings are votes that eliminate teams.
 
TheRobotDevil said:
When three teams are eliminated it’s part of the voting process. I’m really not sure why you are getting agitated we posted the rankings last draft with no problems. If we aren’t posting rankings why bother posting votes and just post results after …. In the end rankings are votes that eliminate teams.
Click to expand...

I'm not agitated I just don't understand why it matters so much to you. It literally doesn't change anything.

TheRobotDevil said:
If we aren’t posting rankings why bother posting votes and just post results after
Click to expand...

You can't possibly think this makes sense.
 
Nosferatu said:
I'm not agitated I just don't understand why it matters so much to you. It literally doesn't change anything.



You can't possibly think this makes sense.
Click to expand...
You said the rankings would influence voters. You could say the same for voting in our old system. We had no problems with voting in the last draft with rankings posted in advance. Not sure why you wouldn’t want rankings posted especially when it involves teams being eliminated
 
I don't know how my post team with that D could be in the bottom half. The best 3 4 DE in the era, the 2 best rushbackers of the era, the best safety of the era, the best possible 3 4 complimentary DE of the era, the best fit for a 3 4 at nose (not as sexy as Ngata or someone like that admittedly) another 3 4 ILB who's average hof monitor season is beaten by only 6 guys in that era and several of the others aren't straight 3 4 guys.

Lemme guess...corner. but even there Gilmore, Harris, and Smith are 3 of the top 8 current dbs in the league.

But it's whatever. I honestly don't care. I will participate when I participate and shut up. Because I don't want to argue. The drafting is fun. I don't give a shit who wins. Congrats to the winners!
 
stakesarehigh said:
I don't know how my post team with that D could be in the bottom half. The best 3 4 DE in the era, the 2 best rushbackers of the era, the best safety of the era, the best possible 3 4 complimentary DE of the era, the best fit for a 3 4 at nose (not as sexy as Ngata or someone like that admittedly) another 3 4 ILB who's average hof monitor season is beaten by only 6 guys in that era and several of the others aren't straight 3 4 guys.

Lemme guess...corner. but even there Gilmore, Harris, and Smith are 3 of the top 8 current dbs in the league.

But it's whatever. I honestly don't care. I will participate when I participate and shut up. Because I don't want to argue. The drafting is fun. I don't give a shit who wins. Congrats to the winners!
Click to expand...
Since only two people offered their opinions and mine was the only one that had you in the bottom half I’ll address it.

I thought your oline was just okay for this draft. On top of that drafting a second tight end instead of a FB to block for LT was a mistake imo. LTs best years and his peak all came with Lorenzo Neal leading the way. Your secondary wasn’t as strong as others but it was a factor in some capacity.

I’m probably the least knowledgeable when it comes to football around here. But that was my reasoning.
 
citysushi said:
Since only two people offered their opinions and mine was the only one that had you in the bottom half I’ll address it.

I thought your oline was just okay for this draft. On top of that drafting a second tight end instead of a FB to block for LT was a mistake imo. LTs best years and his peak all came with Lorenzo Neal leading the way. Your secondary wasn’t as strong as others but it was a factor in some capacity.

I’m probably the least knowledgeable when it comes to football around here. But that was my reasoning.
Click to expand...

Thats fair on LT. Astute observation. The only thing I will say to OL is Trent has an interesting monitor score. Name me how many tackles have 8 consecutive pro Bowls (he didn't play the one year) in NFL history. Short list. By the time Mack is done he will be top 8 all time on monitor at center. I don't value Guard like I do most positions. That's just me.
 
stakesarehigh said:
Liked your teams

Also thought you did a nice job in baseball but caught some unlucky matchups
Click to expand...
Thanks man.

I had the best Oline possible. Mike Webster would’ve been first choice at center, but that’s the only spot possible to upgrade.

Put myself last since I had an ineligible QB.

My secondary wasn’t what it should’ve been. And I get that my receivers weren’t splash names. But people put waaaay too much stock in receivers in these imo.

It’s stupid I got LT in round two.
 
stakesarehigh said:
Thats fair on LT. Astute observation. The only thing I will say to OL is Trent has an interesting monitor score. Name me how many tackles have 8 consecutive pro Bowls (he didn't play the one year) in NFL history. Short list. By the time Mack is done he will be top 8 all time on monitor at center. I don't value Guard like I do most positions. That's just me.
Click to expand...
You nabbed both those guys right before I wanted them. Williams has been underrated his entire career because Washington is a cluster.
 
Only the Browns could have an OL with Thomas, bitonio, Mack and Schwartz and not even manage to be a .500 team.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top