- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 20,718
- Reaction score
- 58,649
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00



The NFL is legally classified as "Entertainment", exactly the same as WWE wrestling.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
where is it classified as "entertainment"?The NFL is legally classified as "Entertainment", exactly the same as WWE wrestling.
It was revealed in 2007 when a Jets fans tried to sue the NFL over Spygate.where is it classified as "entertainment"?
The NFL proved in this lawsuit that they see themselves as a single unit in the "entertainment" industry and the unique league revenue sharing strategy is not common amongst professional sports leagues.
are they still classified as such 13 years later?It was revealed in 2007 when a Jets fans tried to sue the NFL over Spygate.
The case was thrown out of the Supreme Court, because they were legally classified as entertainment.
Also in 2010, in a separate court case against the NFL over branded items like hats and shirts, the league presented itself not as 32 separate teams, but as one singular business “unit in the entertainment marketplace.”are they still classified as such 13 years later?
Nope, their job is to play. They get paid either way, win or lose.regardless of what the league identifies itself as, the athletes' job is still to just go out and win, correct?
they may want to dance a little and be a character, but that is not their primary job.
if Gronk was big dumb Gronk but sucked, do you think he would have played on a team?
I guess it could go back to Michael Jordan playing baseball or Tebow. Both are names and while they might not be good players, fans went to see them. Now were either of them in on "we are a sideshow" or were they still trying their best to play good baseball?
how do you figure?to entertain, but the poll is swayed to your beliefs.
Well, sure. How well they play and how much a team thinks they can help win affects how much they get paid thoughNope, their job is to play. They get paid either way, win or lose.
eh...they might get a contract but that doesn't mean they are going to stay on the team though.Nope, their job is to play. They get paid either way, win or lose.
Depends on the sport, kind ofeh...they might get a contract but that doesn't mean they are going to stay on the team though.
if the team is losing and the player is not performing, they will get released.
how so?Depends on the sport, kind of
Some have guaranteed contracts, so they get paid no matter how well they performhow so?
IMO, option 2 is swayed. "even if they dont play well". it should just be an option "to entertain the fans".how so?
You can release a guy in baseball, but the team is still on the hook for the entire contract.how so?
he should be more entertaining then.You can release a guy in baseball, but the team is still on the hook for the entire contract.
It’s why Chris Davis is killing the Orioles.
I’d argue that breaking the record for most consecutive at bats without a hit is entertaininghe should be more entertaining then.
maybe wear funny glasses or something.