


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True. I don't see that changing unless all the breakaway schools decide to have a schedule full of only opponents in their "division" or whatever name it goes by. Then there wouldn't be any room in the schedule to pay lower level schools to come in. If not, then each school can decide which lower level teams they are willing to pay to come in for a game and how much they will pay them. Just like it is happening now.The biggest problem is and will continue to be that most of these G5 teams get shit tons of money for all of their athletic programs by playing, and losing to, P5 teams.
They'd still be CFB. Just not in the same division. I don't have the figures but I'd be willing to bet our total athletic budget is a whole lot closer in size to that of Sam Houston State's than Texas A&M's.I think the little guys are essential for CFB.
Is a mistake to shrink the field.
You think that is really going to happen? Who do they take with them or will they have unbalanced divisions?Kansas will join the Big 10 first, so after 2025 when the Big 12 media rights expire.
You think that is really going to happen? Who do they take with them or will they have unbalanced divisions?
The only way they do this is if the academic AAU grant money makes it attractive. No other reason.
I don't know if that could happen. It would cause some serious bad blood and butt hurt with the PAC. The PAC and B1G have always been pretty close and that's a big freaking deal.My thinking is Colorado
Like English futbol? Interdasting.I know this would never happen in college football because you can’t just make quick changes on the fly, but who would be a fan of a promotion and relegation system?