The big difference to me is the NFL doesn't vote on who gets into the playoffs in a back of house smoke filled room....other than the tie breakers and EVERY team gets to vote on those. I don't think people would have a problem with rematches whatsoever if that were the case in CFB. If they did then they are nuts.
I agree. Utah and Michigan's styles were playing right into Georgia's wheelhouse. Only chance of beating the dawgs is to be able to sling it around the yard. tOSU had a much better chance of that than either Utah or Michigan.
I think I agree until I remember how Michigan just abused them, and Michigan is very similar to UGA just with less talent. I just don't think that tOSU was good enough on the LOS on either side of the ball. Their WRs are unreal, just not sure that Stroud would have had much time to get the ball to them. But, am thankful for that snowstorm that day!
There are less subtle ways to come out of the closet, just an FYI.
They won 7 BIG games and won the west, doable.No they didn't. Iowa has gone twice and both times they had 10+ wins.
And another dig at the division even though it was already shown that the B1G west is basically the 3rd or fourth best division in CFB.Basically saying the entire PAC and ACC are beneath them, and you could make the case that the SEC east was worse too, they are just hanging their hat on UGA at the moment.
Miss me with this boring, played out nonsense.
And the 2 games they dropped were divisional opponents in Wisconsin and Purdue
LMAO. Been saving that one for 41 years?It’s not a dig at the division , it’s just that the division is not anything special…
Like a division that has a national champion that you have to go through. Thats all I was saying.
Bama and Georgia were pretty much gimmies. Utah was the only remotely bold pick
If you have less talent why are you going to try and play right into the opponents wheelhouse? The only chance you have doing that is if the more talented team beats itself...you ain't going to beat them.
I am not sure UM knew they had less talent until the game started. At game 14, what you can and can't do is kind of baked in at that point.
So you just hope the other team screws up?
No, you do the best you can do. I mean what did you expect them to do? They can't change offensive scheme during the game. I suppose the could have put their QB that runs more in, not that it would have made a difference. At the end of the day, when there is a large talent disparity, the talent is going to win no matter what you try and do.
Like I said, you just lose then? Why even play it?
I guess the answer is, yes, you just lose. If we are still talking UGA v. Michigan, you could tell they had no idea what was going to hit them. Not sure if it was not on the film, or they thought we are the best OL in the country and we can hold up against them, or we have all these great RBs so we can run against them. But, it was pretty obvious quickly that wasn't going to happen.
In Tennessee’s case it’s usually TWO national championship caliber teams, at minimum.
They probably didn’t realize how big the talent gap was. Their o-line was good, they had one of the best RBs in the country and two of the top pass rushers in the country. They rode that to a 12-1 record and a B1G conference title. They didn’t have the receivers to go spread, why would they change what had been working all season?
Tennessee and Auburn have to play Bama and UGA every year. Since 2017, that’s a tough ask for any team
I think that is exactly what they thought because they'd gotten by with it most of the season.
