- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 45,351
- Reaction score
- 86,995
- Bookie:
- $ 10,891.00




Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, you would think that the last few years, that OU, Ohio St, and Bama would have put enough through to make the list. That's crazy.No Ohio State?
![]()
Multiple appearances can distort the data. For instance, Tom Brady accounts for 10 of Michigans appearancesUCLA is the surprising one to me. They are by far the worst program historically of those listed
Not really. Top talent coming out of college is drafted by the worst teams. The best teams are drafting 3 and 4 star guys that proved out.Yeah, you would think that the last few years, that OU, Ohio St, and Bama would have put enough through to make the list. That's crazy.
So does it distort the data for everyone who was on his team in NE and then Tampa?Multiple appearances can distort the data. For instance, Tom Brady accounts for 10 of Michigans appearances
If you give him sole credit for being there. However, 5 star recruits have a much higher chance of being drafted in the 1st round and also at a higher spot within the 1st round. Teams that go to the Super Bowl don't even have the chance to draft those Ayers. It would be an interesting study to take the surface data even deeper.So does it distort the data for everyone who was on his team in NE and then Tampa?![]()
Not sure what that has to do with it. I was simply asking -- that if Brady skewed the data by getting to the SB 10 times. Did it skew it for every guy who was on his team? He had some teammates for 5, 6, 7 years. Wouldn't they skew the data too?If you give him sole credit for being there. However, 5 star recruits have a much higher chance of being drafted in the 1st round and also at a higher spot within the 1st round. Teams that go to the Super Bowl don't even have the chance to draft those Ayers. It would be an interesting study to take the surface data even deeper.
Sure, to a lesser degree. Brady is the outlier. And the most obvious example. I don't know if he had offers from OSU, OU or Alabama or if he was a highly rated recruit. With the number of schools is the field and a limited # of Super Bowls, any high # of appearances will skew the data.Not sure what that has to do with it. I was simply asking -- that if Brady skewed the data by getting to the SB 10 times. Did it skew it for every guy who was on his team? He had some teammates for 5, 6, 7 years. Wouldn't they skew the data too?
Hell, Alabama QBs won the first three Super Bowl MVP awards. Bart Starr twice and Joe Namath.Three Super Bowl MVPs for UGA.
Jake Scott
Terrell Davis
Hines Ward
Did you mean Joe Burrow?Hell, Alabama QBs won the first three Super Bowl MVP awards. Bart Starr twice and Joe Namath.
If Brady had won it the other day, he'd have been the fourth Joe QB to win it. Joe Namath, Joe Montana, Joe Flacco.
Cooper Kupp wasn't the first Super Bowl MVP from what would be considered non FBS school. He is the 8th player from such. There were four in a row from schools like that.... XX - XXIII.
XII - Harvey Martin - East Texas State University (Co MVP with Randy White)
XX - Richard Dent - Tennessee State University
XXI - Phil Sims - Moorehead State University
XXII - Doug Williams - Grambling State University
XXIII - Jerry Rice - Mississippi Valley State University
XXXIV - Kurt Warner - Northern Iowa University
XLVII - Joe Flacco - University of Delaware
LVI - Cooper Kupp - Eastern Washington University
It would be interesting. It would also be interesting to know how many All-Pro by university, recruiting rating for both. Draft position for both, etc.Would be more interested in number of players from each university to have appeared than total appearances, due to the multiple appearances distortion.
Yep. My typical brain fart!Did you mean Joe Burrow?