- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 11,657
- Reaction score
- 18,320
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00


Thats because you're a retardI don't agree.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats because you're a retardI don't agree.
Bullshit. He had it clutched completely within his grasp for at least two steps. By the time the Wisconsin defender was able to jimmy it loose, they were in the end zone. By that point, it's a touchdownThere was never full control. The defender had a hold of it, too.
Is that your final answer?Thats because you're a retard
Even if that were true (its not), possession goes to the offensive playerThere was never full control. The defender had a hold of it, too.
Is that your final answer?
The refs are favoring ND.
There was never full control. The defender had a hold of it, too.
Had the initial call been called incomplete or a fumble, my guess is it would have stood.
Either way, don't believe enough evidence existed to overturn the initial call.
Yeah after the WR took 3 steps. You do know the play ends one breaking the plane right? Had control once he hit the endzone. Play ends there. You know very little about football and it is showing
I think that was right call.
There wasn't three steps with control.
A dull game, back to watching the Ryder Cup.
There was