GAME #6 OREGON DUCKS vs #25 washington fuskies 7pm EST on FOX

While we will never know for sure, there were 2 to 3 UW defenders across the LOS quickly enough that I doubt they get the first down even if he didn't slip. It looked like UW had that play pegged. Not just the obvious that it was going to be a run considering the backup QB, but where it was going.

Had they put Nix back in UW would have had to both honor the pass and the QB run. Even running the exact same play would have had a higher chance to work.

The onside try was kind of dumb and I believe he said as much after the game. I think he said he made like 8 mistakes?

It did look like a veteran HC vs a rookie HC.

Both teams made their share of mistakes. UW just came up with one less than Oregon at the end.

I did hear Wilner say he thought the conference might be sending off something to the NY offices about the fake injury. I guess they actually used the same WR for it as they did against Cal? I didn't see that one, but I guess you could see someone telling him to go down before he dropped.

I don't know how they can fix that, but something has to be done. When teams feel they can do it whenever they want without repercussions it has to be addressed. At the very least make any players requiring play stoppage to sit out the next 3 plays or something.

It couldn't have been more fake.
#3 Ferguson (TE) and #58 Powers-Johnson (OL) are both looking to the sideline.

1668634504641.png

@1 Hutson (WR) gets up just fine, then jumps up in the air and grabs his thigh in dramatic fashion and falls to the ground.

1668634937069.png

Ferguson's telling him to go down.


1668634986275.png

1668635024837.png
 
It was pretty obvious, but I wasn't aware they did the same thing vs Cal and it was the same WR used there.

At least it didn't impact the outcome. Would have been a much bigger deal.

Still the conference should be on full notice that Oregon will cheat to win. I'm sure that makes @Illustrious Potentate happy.
 
It couldn't have been more fake.
#3 Ferguson (TE) and #58 Powers-Johnson (OL) are both looking to the sideline.

View attachment 92159

@1 Hutson (WR) gets up just fine, then jumps up in the air and grabs his thigh in dramatic fashion and falls to the ground.

View attachment 92160

Ferguson's telling him to go down.


View attachment 92161

View attachment 92162


This is a rule I'm still shocked has not been changed. The 10 second run off should still apply even though they got the 1st down. This results in nothing more than a free timeout for a team that had no timeouts left. The game completely stops, you get to regroup and the clock does not start again until the snap. A clear exploit advantage for the team on offense. As compared to having to run up and hurry to get a snap off before the clock start ticking again.

The fake injury was the only reason the game was even in position for that illegal contact play to matter.
 
I'm sure some would probably argue that "but what if its a legit injury"

Tough luck? It's way more likely to be used as a rule exploit to gain a free timeout than a legit injury occurring. IMO.
 
It couldn't have been more fake.
#3 Ferguson (TE) and #58 Powers-Johnson (OL) are both looking to the sideline.

View attachment 92159

@1 Hutson (WR) gets up just fine, then jumps up in the air and grabs his thigh in dramatic fashion and falls to the ground.

View attachment 92160

Ferguson's telling him to go down.


View attachment 92161

View attachment 92162

especially in game 10 in NOV. you just dont see leg cramps or whatever at this point the same as if this were game 1 or 2 in the heat or a bowl in heat and time off.
 


Matters so little they don't even pretend to deny it. Give some credit for the honesty?

How does "oh yeah, I totally did that on purpose, we're coached to do it..." = "adds to the speculation..."

:lol:

How about "confirms speculation"
 
How does "oh yeah, I totally did that on purpose, we're coached to do it..." = "adds to the speculation..."

:lol:

How about "confirms speculation"
Easy to dump on them for it, but if the system is so broken that you can openly abuse the injury rules for free timeouts without fear of repercussions, it's the system at fault.
 
How does "oh yeah, I totally did that on purpose, we're coached to do it..." = "adds to the speculation..."

:lol:

How about "confirms speculation"

What say you, @OregonDucks ?

Without that "injury" stopping the clock 'til the next snap at :06, the clock starts running as soon as the ball is spotted.

Spiking the ball would have left :04 and the 'stepped out of bounds' play would have been the last one since it took :05.

Oregon lost (at home) to a 13 pt underdog.
 
Oregon with their 2nd Pac 12 loss…yippie
 
Oregon with their 2nd Pac 12 loss…yippie
The ironic part is there are a lot of UW fans actually pulling for Oregon this week. Apparently it helps UW chances of making the CCG. They need the Utah loss and beavs to win the Civil War.

There's only a slim chance anyway and there is never a case where I pull for Oregon to win. Fuck the Ducks.
 
The ironic part is there are a lot of UW fans actually pulling for Oregon this week. Apparently it helps UW chances of making the CCG. They need the Utah loss and beavs to win the Civil War.

There's only a slim chance anyway and there is never a case where I pull for Oregon to win. Fuck the Ducks.
Wait… why does Utah need to lose? Don’t we just need Oregon to lose one more and us to win out?
 
Wait… why does Utah need to lose? Don’t we just need Oregon to lose one more and us to win out?
I don't do scenario village. It's going to end how it ends, but softy was going on about it the other day and Wilner also mentioned it.

I have a flow chart on the pac12 thread that shows it all, but it makes my head hurt too much to get deep into it.

3 teams have 1 conf loss. Obviously UW needs at least two of them to lose and for UW to have the tiebreaker over them. Those tiebreakers get weird when it's more than 2 teams.

All I know is, fuck the Ducks.
 
I don't do scenario village. It's going to end how it ends, but softy was going on about it the other day and Wilner also mentioned it.

I have a flow chart on the pac12 thread that shows it all, but it makes my head hurt too much to get deep into it.

3 teams have 1 conf loss. Obviously UW needs at least two of them to lose and for UW to have the tiebreaker over them. Those tiebreakers get weird when it's more than 2 teams.

All I know is, fuck the Ducks.
Do they not do the top team from each division anymore?

And yeah, I don't care, hope Utah beats the shit out of them.
 
Back
Top