- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 26,154
- Reaction score
- 29,098
- Bookie:
- $ 500.00
- Location
- Sitting in Houston Traffic....
8 Nebraska players have officially sued the B1G
- Thread starter huskers1217
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 10,906
- Reaction score
- 16,778
- Bookie:
- $ 42,955.00
lol, what a mess
Kevin Warren is a goner
Kevin Warren is a goner
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 29,589
- Reaction score
- 60,637
- Bookie:
- $ 4,434.00
- Location
- SoCal. The Promised Land.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,705
- Reaction score
- 11,288
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
Warren right now...
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 44,246
- Reaction score
- 85,463
- Bookie:
- $ 10,891.00
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 44,246
- Reaction score
- 85,463
- Bookie:
- $ 10,891.00
Me right now...Warren right now...
Nothing will probably come of this, but I love that they aren't simply sitting by and letting this go unchecked.
Nebraska gots balls. Anyone else?
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,705
- Reaction score
- 11,288
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
balls? if they had balls the players would have transferred.. But if you wanna give them kudos for suing the conference it fought to get into in..sure so much #WINNING I suppose
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 8,019
- Reaction score
- 9,480
- Bookie:
- $ 4,540.00
did you even read the lawsuit?? its about playing football not getting rich.....when big10 leadership is retarded you got to make your own path
Maybe not, but there are a lot of inquiring minds that want to know EXACTLY what happened and how this went down. Who votes for what and such.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,705
- Reaction score
- 11,288
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
bro they ain't getting anything.. judge said 8 kids demanding documents ain't going to happen.. Players don't have contracts with the conference.. they are free to go and transfer.. hell the NCAA will approve like this one:
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,705
- Reaction score
- 11,288
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
DId you listen to the clip? When has this been about money? The conference is the one walking away from it.. this was about the players demanding A. Conference to reverse it's decision and play this season, this fall and B. If that fails, they want to have the paperwork/documents into who voted for what in that meeting that decided the fate of the season.
So
We still don't know the truth.
We still don't know the truth.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 8,019
- Reaction score
- 9,480
- Bookie:
- $ 4,540.00
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 14,705
- Reaction score
- 11,288
- Bookie:
- $ 6,000.00
yeah they aren't getting the paperwork.. only thing that can bring light to this is McMurphy or some reporter getting an inside source.. and at that point you really gonna trust it? Sucks for the kids and the football staffs. Again those presidents in the PAC and BIG are academics first, sports a distant second.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 8,019
- Reaction score
- 9,480
- Bookie:
- $ 4,540.00
when they are ok for after thanksgiving its not about academics but is about politics.....
Don't know where she said that, she has given Big10 till Monday afternoon to respond. Her reservations as far as I know are.....
Lancaster County judge Susan Strong, who was assigned the Nebraska-Big Ten case, gave Luger and the Big Ten a 5 p.m. deadline on Monday Aug. 31 to file a written response to the motion set by attorney Mike Flood, who is the lead attorney representing eight Nebraska football players. This came as a result of Flood's filing of an expedited discovery.
As the debate resembled the opening remarks of something that may turn out to be much bigger, Judge Strong left the hearing with only one concern.
"There's one concern that I have with the expedited discovery and that is request No. 4 may not be something that is narrowly tailored to an expedited discovery request," Judge Strong said. "Request No. 4 requests all assessments, memoranda, studies, scientific data and any medical information and advice in possession of the Big Ten at any time during the period from March 15, 2020, to the present regarding any decision to modify, cancel, or postpone the 2020 fall football season.
"Seems broad to require somebody to respond to that in an expedited fashion."
So her concern was more to the amount of documentation they were requesting given the expedited timeframe. I don't see where the judge said "8 kids demanding documents ain't gonna happen". You have a link to the article reporting this?