trojanfan12
Super Moderator




You are 100% correct, I don't know what it's like. I worked for a guy who went to the Naval Academy, and I went to HS with a guy who went to the AF Academy, and that's about as close as it gets.
I know it's different though, and way behind anything in terms of rigors that I'll hopefully ever go through. I love watching the Academies go up against one another, and would love to attend an Army/Navy game. I have incredible respect for ANYONE who even tries to go to those schools because from what I've heard, it's insane.
But we are talking about a sport, a college sport. Where it doesn't matter if you allow anyone with a pulse in, or require incoming students to be perfect students, the rules are the rules. It was already mentioned that the students get a stipend even before the NIL came about, which was something specific to the Academies I believe.
The NCAA just has a period where they don't want the recruiting to be on campus, and AF broke the rule. This doesn't really seem to be that difficult of a rule to follow, and the fact that AF isn't appealing it means that there may actually be more, but are taking this to save face. I'm not saying that's the case, but certainly you'd think they'd appeal this.
I hate to bring you more bad news, but I agree with a lot of what you post, so your constant annoyance at anything I post is just annoying at this point.
I get what you are saying and generally agree.
However, college sports are also supposed to be about fair play as well. Imo, fairness/fair play isn't as simple as everyone playing by the same rules. Sometimes there are situations where a rule could/should be "overlooked" in the spirit of fairness/fair play.
Imo, because of the rigors that the student athletes at the service academies go through just to be able to compete, overlooking or granting leniency (maybe let them off with a warning) on something this minor would have been a better move on the NCAA's part.