Caleb Williams

Ah. I'm in the Baptist belt. They may have just said fuck it around here. I'll check after Mardi Gras

Yup. As I remembered it's only during Lent.

"Northwoods Walleye fish makes its annual return to the Culver's menu for the 2021 Lenten season. You'll find it available in a sandwich as well as a dinner plate."

 
Yup. As I remembered it's only during Lent.

"Northwoods Walleye fish makes its annual return to the Culver's menu for the 2021 Lenten season. You'll find it available in a sandwich as well as a dinner plate."

Hell yeah.

Limited seafood options in this tiny ass town.
 
ATTENTION:

Just checked. 10 of the 2022 Rivals Top 250 players were from California. That's 4% of the total. Which means 96% of the Top 250 were from other states. Little bitty Oklahoma had 7 players in the Top 250.

We now return you to your normal programming.
That's cute you use Rivals, as if 247 sports doesn't exist. It is the gold standard composite ranking of all the sites.

California had 34 blue chip recruits -- grades of 90 or highers. They have 22 of the top 250 players, not 10. Hell -- California had 10 of the top 100 recruits nationally.

You can skew the stats to try and make OU look as good as you'd like -- the fact remains -- Your highest ranked recruit was 92nd nationally.

Bama signed 15 players ranked higher than 92nd nationally. A&M signed 17 players ranked higher than the 92nd nationally. Ohio State signed 8 players ranked higher than 92nd nationally. Georgia signed 11 players ranked higher than 92nd nationally.

Just to spell it out for you. Out of the top 91 players nationally signed -- 51 out of the 91 signed with 4 schools. That is 57% of the best of the best high school recruits signing with 4 schools.

Hell -- Texas A&M alone signed 22 players in the top 250. But props on 7. Should have no problem competing with the big boys.
 
That's cute you use Rivals, as if 247 sports doesn't exist. It is the gold standard composite ranking of all the sites.

California had 34 blue chip recruits -- grades of 90 or highers. They have 22 of the top 250 players, not 10. Hell -- California had 10 of the top 100 recruits nationally.

You can skew the stats to try and make OU look as good as you'd like -- the fact remains -- Your highest ranked recruit was 92nd nationally.

Bama signed 15 players ranked higher than 92nd nationally. A&M signed 17 players ranked higher than the 92nd nationally. Ohio State signed 8 players ranked higher than 92nd nationally. Georgia signed 11 players ranked higher than 92nd nationally.

Just to spell it out for you. Out of the top 91 players nationally signed -- 51 out of the 91 signed with 4 schools. That is 57% of the best of the best high school recruits signing with 4 schools.

Hell -- Texas A&M alone signed 22 players in the top 250. But props on 7. Should have no problem competing with the big boys.
LMAO. And when I have used 24/7 for stats in the past, people bitched I should have used Rivals. Piss off. You're the kind of miserable person who ruins message boards. I appreciate people who argue coherently and even with passion for their teams but your kind just has verbal diarrhea.
 
This is pretty amazing given everything that's happened.

Or maybe last years team rankings is why you weren't even in the Big12CCG.
 
Or maybe last years team rankings is why you weren't even in the Big12CCG.
Truthfully, OU played like crap all year long and it just caught up with us. We needed two fourth down conversions to pull out a win against Kansas. :tsk: And then we started playing so lousy we lost to Baylor and Jr. Maybe the most disappointing year at OU in the past 15 years. The D sucked, the O sucked and the coaching sucked.
 
LMAO. And when I have used 24/7 for stats in the past, people bitched I should have used Rivals. Piss off. You're the kind of miserable person who ruins message boards. I appreciate people who argue coherently and even with passion for their teams but your kind just has verbal diarrhea.
247 is a composite ranking, which means it is the average of the other sites combined for a final ranking.

All I did was point out the difference between a top 10 class, like Oklahoma had and a top 5 class which the 4 teams i pointed out had.

The advantage is astronomical.
 
Truthfully, OU played like crap all year long and it just caught up with us. We needed two fourth down conversions to pull out a win against Kansas. :tsk: And then we started playing so lousy we lost to Baylor and Jr. Maybe the most disappointing year at OU in the past 15 years. The D sucked, the O sucked and the coaching sucked.
I saw most of the games, I know you were a few bounces away from a couple more wins...and a couple more losses. That's sports.

But having one or two more studs out there could have been the difference. That's my only point there (aside from light trolling), comparing this recruiting class to last years when last years got you nowhere isn't that helpful.
 
I saw most of the games, I know you were a few bounces away from a couple more wins...and a couple more losses. That's sports.

But having one or two more studs out there could have been the difference. That's my only point there (aside from light trolling), comparing this recruiting class to last years when last years got you nowhere isn't that helpful.
Of course we did have the Messiah of Offense as our head coach and our QB was a water walker........or at least that's what we thought until the SHTF. I'm just anxious to turn over a new leaf and move on. Getting the #8 class this year after all the chaos tells me Venables and the rest of the staff have a high ceiling. We do need better talent and some luck to go along with a new approach that emphasizes both O and D.
 
cotdamn, I think the last few pages have me back on the side of OU fans. Well, all but a couple. :dhd:
amazing what a retard can do for the sport amirite lmfao
 
Caleb Williams is loudly building a red and yellow monster, guys (i think).

A really douchie UM fan even told me so.
 
Back
Top