


Hey I noticed that Colorado started on offense for both overtimes, since when has that been a thing? I thought the teams switched each additional overtime.
It's called the "rule book".

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey I noticed that Colorado started on offense for both overtimes, since when has that been a thing? I thought the teams switched each additional overtime.
Did you see the ad for Prime Sunglasses?ESPN App notification was acting like Colorado did something amazing. Completely ignoring that Colorado State is a terrible football team. The hype is really out of control
Colo screwed up when they won the flip the first time.Hey I noticed that Colorado started on offense for both overtimes, since when has that been a thing? I thought the teams switched each additional overtime.
…and State parlayed that screwup when they didn’t go for 2.Colo screwed up when they won the flip the first time.
Natty on a platter.#13 Oregon
#5 USC
ASU
Stanford
#24 UCLA
#16 Oregon State
Arizona
#23 WSU
#12 Utah
That is a heck of an upcoming schedule for the Buffs.
A 3 point win over a mediocre TCU and a 2OT narrow win against a bad CSU team is not impressive in the slightest. I'm not sure what would make you say CSU is improved when they're 0-2 with a blowout loss to a solid but not elite WSU team. Nebraska clearly isn't good and is more likely a 3-6 in-conference team than a B1G West champ. If you call 3 unranked teams challenging, then their upcoming gauntlet might as well be against NFL teams.I'm not saying those teams are good. But they are respectable IMO. If you look at the top 25 they've played a better schedule than probably 20 of those teams. Yes, CSU was bad last year, but I think they are pretty improved this year. They've also played Wazzu and CU so being 0-2 isn't as bad as the record looks. Again, it's not an amazing schedule, but it's been harder than a lot of top 25 teams have played thus far.
A 3 point win over a mediocre TCU and a 2OT narrow win against a bad CSU team is not impressive in the slightest. I'm not sure what would make you say CSU is improved when they're 0-2 with a blowout loss to a solid but not elite WSU team. Nebraska clearly isn't good and is more likely a 3-6 in-conference team than a B1G West champ. If you call 3 unranked teams challenging, then their upcoming gauntlet might as well be against NFL teams.
A 3 point win over a mediocre TCU and a 2OT narrow win against a bad CSU team is not impressive in the slightest. I'm not sure what would make you say CSU is improved when they're 0-2 with a blowout loss to a solid but not elite WSU team. Nebraska clearly isn't good and is more likely a 3-6 in-conference team than a B1G West champ. If you call 3 unranked teams challenging, then their upcoming gauntlet might as well be against NFL teams.
A 3 point win over a mediocre TCU and a 2OT narrow win against a bad CSU team is not impressive in the slightest. I'm not sure what would make you say CSU is improved when they're 0-2 with a blowout loss to a solid but not elite WSU team. Nebraska clearly isn't good and is more likely a 3-6 in-conference team than a B1G West champ. If you call 3 unranked teams challenging, then their upcoming gauntlet might as well be against NFL teams.
Yea I don’t get trying to talk up Colorado State even if they are “improved” they are still at best a 5-7 type low rung MWC team. No true good team should need double OT to beat them
This is their "breather" game though, which is my point. TCU probably a top 35 team, Nebraska probably a top 60 team and CSU probably a top 75ish team(projecting). The latter being a an instate rivalry game, coming off a bye, on top of coming off a win over your other traditional rival, with a top 15 team coming up next week. That's a tough spot. Weird things happen in rivalries.
I think Colorado is your basic run of the mill average team. They probably aren’t going to beat any of the better teams left on their schedule. They are good enough to beat the other average teams but also are liable to lose to teams they maybe shouldn’t.
Oline is bad. Not much of a running game. Defense isn’t very good overall. The passing game will keep them above water but if that bad OL gets Sanders hurt it’s over.
We got people out here acting like they are a upper level team already. But also wanting to excuse them needing 2 OT to beat a team that went 3-9 last year, hell some are even trying to make it out as a impressive accomplishment (looking at ESPN and Fox)
When you say average do you mean a team that's rated like 55-65? That's what I think when I hear average, which I don't think is fair given what they've accomplished thus far. My guess is they are probably a 7 or 8 win team. If they get to that they deserve to be ranked by the end of the year given their ridiculous schedule they have left.
Depth is going to be an issue for them. They didn't have their starting center yesterday, which didn't help. They also lost arguably the best player in the country in the 2nd quarter. Not excusing the close game, but they don't have great depth. I think Oregon will probably beat them by 17 or so. And USC probably will too maybe by more, but those teams are great to elite. CU isn't that, but I do think they are a top 25 team. Even if they go 7-5, I'll still think that.
Oh he will be unhinged in November when he comes to Pullman.Or, we just want to see him go unhinged in the presser.