Curious how the CFP would handle this

Deep Creek said:
What do each of them make for a home game? (I know they'd give it up on a home and home deal every other year.)

Screw neutral site games. Play at Kyle and Autzen for a couple of years.
Click to expand...

In terms of broadcast revenue? Theres no incremental gain.
 
What was this thread about? Anyway, from GROK:

1736083268354.png
1736083316876.png
1736083353218.png
 
OregonDucks said:
The College Football Playoff expanded this year to 12 teams. Did the equate, or did the college football world, take into account for if you have a situation where a team only has one loss, that coming in the playoffs but a 2 loss team wins the national championship or if the two teams in the national championship game lost to that undefeated team?

For example, Oregon entered the playoffs as the #1 team and undefeated. The Ducks beat Ohio State and Penn State, two playoff teams and two teams in the playoffs. The Ducks won the B1G which both Ohio State and Penn State are apart of. Oregon only suffered one loss, which came in the playoffs. They only got one game in the playoffs to play while the other two got an extra game.

What if Ohio State and Penn State played in the national championship game? Where does that put Oregon? A possible debate for a share of the national championship? I mean the Ducks beat both of them and potentially will have less losses than the winner. Penn State is 0-1 vs the Ducks and Ohio State would be 1-1. Seems this is a plausible scenario the CFB world forgot to iron out when they put together the bracket. Major flaw in their playoff ranking and bracket. Another reason the system needs a complete overhaul and revamp for next year and year's moving forward. We can't have this mistake happening again and we can't punish the #1 team in the country for going undefeated and winning their conference championship. No other sport have I seen such an asinine playoff ranking setup.
Click to expand...
The way Oregon lost to Ohio State should answer your question. The Ducks got a lesson in big boy football.
 
Deep Creek said:
This is the best explanation I've seen. At least the one that makes the most sense to me.

So unless there is specific language in the conference media agreement directed at this type of games, all is negotiable, no?
Click to expand...
Exactly. Retard_Alert keeps getting wrecked.
 
fishinabarrel said:
If you do that it will never happen. They will just argue about who has rights to the stream the whole time
Click to expand...
we will offer it to meatspin first.
 
fishinabarrel said:
What happened to @duckboy33 ? Haven't seen him around. He was talking almost OD levels of trash for a good part of the season
Click to expand...

not sure where he is as of right now, but his mother sent me some footage she captured of him late Wednesday night:


Arrested Development Crying GIF by HULU
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
He knows he is cooked. He'll either ghost, or try to spin a false narrative.
Click to expand...

Like the gutless mental gymnastics wank you are, you've distracted, distorted, and twisted everything about the issue.

The original thread had to do with OD complaining about the game start time being at 9am on the left coast. You injected your stupid statement that....."Teams can easily tell the networks that they will use a neutral site and put up the game for bid."
i.e. You implied Ohio St and Oregon could have gotten together, voided all contracts, told the PAC/Big 10 conferences and media rights holders to fuck off, and move the game to a neutral field, and given the game to the highest media right bidder themselves.

Again I ask you.....

Where was the Sept 11, 2021 Oregon/Ohio St game played and why?
Who was the home team and why?
Who carried the broadcast and why?

The Oregon/Ohio St game was an agreed to home-and-home 8 years in advance (2012). It wasn't some one-off, one and done, neutral site game like a Kick-Off Classic.
 
Red_Alert said:
Like the gutless mental gymnastics wank you are, you've distracted, distorted, and twisted everything about the issue.

The original thread had to do with OD complaining about the game start time being at 9am on the left coast. You injected your stupid statement that....."Teams can easily tell the networks that they will use a neutral site and put up the game for bid."
i.e. You implied Ohio St and Oregon could have gotten together, voided all contracts, told the PAC/Big 10 conferences and media rights holders to fuck off, and move the game to a neutral field, and given the game to the highest media right bidder themselves.

Again I ask you.....

Where was the Sept 11, 2021 Oregon/Ohio St game played and why?
Who was the home team and why?
Who carried the broadcast and why?

The Oregon/Ohio St game was an agreed to home-and-home 8 years in advance (2012). It wasn't some one-off, one and done, neutral site game like a Kick-Off Classic.
Click to expand...

LOL @ you creating a false narrative.

You've been cooked so bad in this thread.
 
Red_Alert said:
You were cooked in the original thread.
Everything since you getting called out for your stupidity that day has been your mental gymnastics distractions.
Click to expand...

Teams can schedule OOC games at neutral sites. They can opt for the venue/network that will provide the biggest payout, as these games are negotiated separately from the conference network agreements. Money received from playing in these games does not go to the conference, but directly to the teams.

This is indisputable, but I'm sure you will try to come up with some BS yet again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top