Does UGA get a seat at the big boy table now?

Illustrious Potentate said:
Only if you're counting 64, 73 and 78, but everyone knows those are fake titles.
Click to expand...
You don't approve of them, but they are not "fake" titles:

1964 = AP and UPI
1973 = UPI
1978 = AP

At least they won the SEC in those years.
 
78Cyclones said:
You don't approve of them, but they are not "fake" titles:

1964 = AP and UPI
1973 = UPI
1978 = AP

At least they won the SEC in those years.
Click to expand...
Nah, they’re fake and if Bama had any pride they wouldn’t claim them.

If not winning the conference matters, go ahead and hand us that 2017 trophy we were screwed out of since Bama shouldn’t have been in the playoffs to begin with and Tyler Simmons wasn’t offsides when he blocked that punt
 
Voltaire said:
I have to take LSU outta there ... Clemson and ohio state with Alabama still on the throne. A consecutive appearance by Georgia and they join the elite. If we (Michigan) can take down ohio state again and make an appearance at the Big Show, we may be able to take the seat from ohio state in 2023 or 2024. One good season doesn't do it.
Click to expand...
Michigan has A LOT to replace and should be interesting to see what they can do next year./
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
Nah, they’re fake and if Bama had any pride they wouldn’t claim them.

If not winning the conference matters, go ahead and hand us that 2017 trophy we were screwed out of since Bama shouldn’t have been in the playoffs to begin with and Tyler Simmons wasn’t offsides when he blocked that punt
Click to expand...
Both 2017 Alabama and 2021 Georgia deserve an * for not winning their Conference Championship in the given year, but neither are "fake" Championships. They both won by the rules in play in the given year.

Personally, regardless of desgnated National Championship selectors, I think teams that have Undefeated, Untied Bowl seasons are more worthy than teams that have a loss, have a tie, didn't win their conference, didn't Bowl, Bowled and lost, etc. However, that doesn't make other National Championships "fake".

FWIW, Alabama has 9 Undefeated, Untied Bowl Seasons: 1925, 1930, 1934, 1945, 1961, 1966, 1979, 1992, 2009 and 2020. Penn State is next with 5: 1968, 1969, 1973, 1986 and 1994. Then, there are the others including Georgia with 2: 1946 and 1980.

Let the "National Championship" trophies fall where they may.
 
7samurai13 said:
Michigan has A LOT to replace and should be interesting to see what they can do next year./
Click to expand...
An easy OOC Schedule will make things smooth at the beginning, but we play you guys, ohio state, Penn State and Iowa. So we shall see if they are ready.
 
Voltaire said:
I think there is a rotation with the West ... We get Iowa and then Nebraska and Illinois. Wisconsin should dump Illinois State and play Michigan!!!
Click to expand...

Kburjr said:
I'm in.
Click to expand...
We would dump Colorado State and move our Hawaii game to Hawaii (plug in a bye week and let the fellas go surfing).
 
Kirby is pushing out Monken.. guess he's going to let Cooper/Peyton/Eli pick the next OC
Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at 1.23.32 PM.png
 
78Cyclones said:
Both 2017 Alabama and 2021 Georgia deserve an * for not winning their Conference Championship in the given year
Click to expand...
Truth Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
 
Funny how the blue bloods and who is considered a blue blood came about. It's like a certain era of CFB and it's only from that certain era of football. It's like if you won multiple titles within the timeframe of the 70's-90's you're considered a blue blood. No one seems to consider Minnesota a blue blood and yet they have something like 7 national titles.

Clemson has a few recent national titles but i dont think they are considered a blue blood
 
Thiefery said:
Kirby is pushing out Monken.. guess he's going to let Cooper/Peyton/Eli pick the next OC
View attachment 56431
Click to expand...
Pushing out Monken would be a mistake. This team did average nearly 40 ppg this season.

I’m hearing the Miami DB coach is headed this way. But the secondary was the weakest link on the team. The front 7 covered their asses most of the season
 
OregonDucks said:
Funny how the blue bloods and who is considered a blue blood came about. It's like a certain era of CFB and it's only from that certain era of football. It's like if you won multiple titles within the timeframe of the 70's-90's you're considered a blue blood. No one seems to consider Minnesota a blue blood and yet they have something like 7 national titles.

Clemson has a few recent national titles but i dont think they are considered a blue blood
Click to expand...
Alabama and Ohio State are the only blue bloods that have done anything of note in the last 15 years.

Miami and FSU aren’t considered blue bloods. UGA and Clemson could swap natties for the next 20 years and not be considered blue bloods
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
Pushing out Monken would be a mistake. This team did average nearly 40 ppg this season.

I’m hearing the Miami DB coach is headed this way. But the secondary was the weakest link on the team. The front 7 covered their asses most of the season
Click to expand...
if pushing out monken means Arch coming in..u do it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top