ESPN Has An Obvious Nebraska Hater.

It's not a ranking, you flaming idiot. It's a "Standings".
I didn't say anything about a ranking. Did you see that black copter over your house?
 
Why is (2-1)(5-1) #22 Illinois above (2-1)(5-1) #4 Ohio St in the standings?

Oh I know, because it's in alphabetical order. ;)

Well if you're looking for a reason for OSU to be above Nebraska it's because they have a better record against the 2-1 grouping.
 
Whomever inputs data into their 'Standings' uses alphabetical order on everyone but Nebraska.

Proof: (2-1)(5-1) Ohio St is listed ahead of (2-1)(5-1) Nebraska even though the letter 'N' comes before the letter 'O'.
Every other standing is listed in alphabetical order.
It's why Indiana is ahead of Oregon who's ahead of Penn St.

View attachment 126495


I pointed it out last week when they had Washington ahead of Nebraska in the 'Standings' when both were (2-1) in conference even though Nebraska was (5-1) overall and Washington was (4-2). They went back to following alphabetical order after that.

I know it doesn't mean a damn thing. Just saying whomever is putting in the data is breaking their own alphabetic rule.
You do realize that Ohio State is the Texas of the B1G don't you?
 
Well if you're looking for a reason for OSU to be above Nebraska it's because they have a better record against the 2-1 grouping.

DERRP!!

Stop trying to justify something that has nothing to do with what you're pointing out.

Does (3-0)(6-0) #16 Indiana have a "better record against the 2-1 grouping than (3-0)(6-0) #2 Oregon or (3-0)(6-0) #3 Penn St? Of course not.

Indiana has not beaten a ranked opponent.
Oregon beaten (2-1) #4 Ohio St.
Penn St beaten (2-1) #22 Illinois.

Nebraska is the ONLY one that's not in alphabetical order regarding 'standings'.

I showed you same last week when (2-1)(4-2) Washington was ahead of (2-1)(5-1) Nebraska in the standings.
 
DERRP!!

Stop trying to justify something that has nothing to do with what you're pointing out.

Does (3-0)(6-0) #16 Indiana have a "better record against the 2-1 grouping than (3-0)(6-0) #2 Oregon or (3-0)(6-0) #3 Penn St? Of course not.

Indiana has not beaten a ranked opponent.
Oregon beaten (2-1) #4 Ohio St.
Penn St beaten (2-1) #22 Illinois.

Nebraska is the ONLY one that's not in alphabetical order regarding 'standings'.

I showed you same last week when (2-1)(4-2) Washington was ahead of (2-1)(5-1) Nebraska in the standings.

I mean get mad all you want, it's how they organize basketball teams in the standings.

IU, PSU, and Oregon are 0-0 against their grouping at 3-0.
 
I mean get mad all you want, it's how they organize basketball teams in the standings.

IU, PSU, and Oregon are 0-0 against their grouping at 3-0.

So now it's a distraction to "bAsKeTBaLL"?

LMFAO!!!

Ohio St is behind Illinois because..... Wait for it......

Alphabetical order.
 
Nebraska is above Ohio St in the Big 10's own standings because........ Wait for it.......

Alphabetical order.....

1728849706439.png


"bUt BaSkEtBaLL" ;)
 
OKay, enough bickering, I admit it!! It's me, I'm the ESPN employee dicking over Nebraska on the standings page. Why?

BECAUSE FUCK'EM, THAT'S WHY!! AAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHA!
Evil Laugh GIF by FaZe Clan
 
This might be it. But I still think it's more likely that someone is doing this to see your reaction.

My reaction?

Are you saying the individual twho enters data into the ESPN Standings reads this site? LOL

I haven't posted anything about it anywhere else, nor have I read about it anywhere else.

I posted one thing here about them doing it with Washington last week and let it go figuring it was just an oversight error.

Doing it again this week with Ohio St proves it was not just an error.
Of all the other conference standings on ESPN (133 teams), Nebraska is the only team they don't follow alphabetical order of precedence on? LOL

The Big 10's own website standings has the correct order.
1) Conference win/loss.
2) Overall win/loss.
3) Alphabetical Order.
 
Dude, we've had this convo before. A folding metal chair sitting next to your kids plastic wading pool is not a "pond dock".

I have a 24 ft floating dock with a trailer to pull it out in the winter time so the ice won't crush it.

They're not my kids. They're my nephew's kids spending the day out here fishing.
 
Back
Top