- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Posts
- 8,645
- Reaction score
- 6,973
- Bookie:
- $ 1,000.00




My conference championship comment is the 12 CFP, not the current 4 CFP. With 4, subjectivity is literally built into the CFP. When there are 12 you have a mix ... 6 conf champs which is objective, then 6 at large which will be subjective. It's the best of both worlds.1. You just said that there is a way for teams to play their way in. Win your conference. That simple. You might have to balance schedules or get rid of divisions but it can be done. And that's waaaaay better than voting on it. Although at a certain point at-larges are necessary and then you have no choice but to have a selection committee.
2. That's the problem. These tards are choosing the best four using past years performance and program reputation. That's idiotic. Remove subjectivity as much as possible.
8 is probably all that's needed. 12? eh...whatever I don't care. I dislike the idea of the College Football Post Season Invitational Tournament with a bad committee more than I dislike the number of teams they let in.
8 isn't happening - SEC's Sankey four days ago: "I think four has worked, is working and can continue to work," Sankey said. "So it’s four or 12. Eight with a whole bunch of automatic opportunities for conference champions does not work."