Heisman ... who you got?

Seems you do not either. Nix may win and is the favorite, I explained and provided information why Daniels should win the award. If you think there is a reason Nix should win feel free to share and compare it to the Daniels stats

More accurate.
 
Nix is a more accurate QB.
If you had a graphic that showed all the areas where Nix was the better QB, you would have posted it a long time ago. It doesn't exist because Daniel's has better stats almost across the board. That isn't to say he is the best. That would be Brock Bowers. But, Daniel's has better stats and the Heisman typically goes to the QB with the best stats.
 
He needs to learn how to tackle and defend the pass better. That is the silly media thought process on this. Heisman is an individual award, not a team award. Daniels has about 900 more yards and 7 more TDs. He the QB and the leading rusher for LSU.
Plus he did it against SEC competition not PAC defenses.
 
I am an excellent reader. What you said simply didn't make sense, just like everything else you have posted in this thread.
What doesn't make sense about Nix being a more accurate passer?

He's on the verge of the most accurate season in history.
 
If you had a graphic that showed all the areas where Nix was the better QB, you would have posted it a long time ago. It doesn't exist because Daniel's has better stats almost across the board. That isn't to say he is the best. That would be Brock Bowers. But, Daniel's has better stats and the Heisman typically goes to the QB with the best stats.

That must be why Daniels isn't favored to win the Heisman.
 
What doesn't make sense about Nix being a more accurate passer?

He's on the verge of the most accurate season in history.
So, there are about 50 different metrics and you hone in on the one where Nix is better. And ignore the other 49? A little homerish if you ask me.
 
Back
Top