High school team destroyed opponent 106-0

Illustrious Potentate said:
“We’ll stop trying to score when you stop trying to stop us”

But you know a way to put an end to a situation like that? Cheap shot that UCLA bound QB that was still in the game a few times. Make him fear for his football future, and if you blow out his knee or rattle his brains, show no remorse. QB and coach won’t do it again.
Click to expand...

You wanna the shooting to start, because that is how the shooting starts.
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
“We’ll stop trying to score when you stop trying to stop us”

But you know a way to put an end to a situation like that? Cheap shot that UCLA bound QB that was still in the game a few times. Make him fear for his football future, and if you blow out his knee or rattle his brains, show no remorse. QB and coach won’t do it again.
Click to expand...
I’d hope most kids wouldn’t need to be told to cheap shot him either. They should just know to do it.

Sucks, but that would’ve been the equalizer here, destroys that kids life. Never again would their douchenozzle coach run up the score. It’s the only answer. And it’s fair.

And why is there not a running clock? You get up 40 here, I think, and that thing doesn’t stop again.
 
Kburjr said:
High school football. It ain't life. It ain't war. HS coaches teach how to compete and teamwork. This coach didn't do his job.
Click to expand...
The objective of any sport is to win as much as possible. Now the coach may have taken "winning" to "Hitler" levels here, but saying he didn't do his job is false.
 
RP-29 said:
So you're all-in on teaching your kid that trying your best is only appropriate to some arbitrary checkpoint?
Click to expand...

That's not trying your best at that point, that is straight up bullying
 
I bet OSUx would run up the score like that against a high school. Theyz beleevs in stile pointeses.
 
fishinabarrel said:
That's not trying your best at that point, that is straight up bullying
Click to expand...
It’s high school football, we are supposed to be teaching them team work and positive shit, running up the score is not positive.
 
broncosmitty said:
I’d hope most kids wouldn’t need to be told to cheap shot him either. They should just know to do it.

Sucks, but that would’ve been the equalizer here, destroys that kids life. Never again would their douchenozzle coach run up the score. It’s the only answer. And it’s fair.

And why is there not a running clock? You get up 40 here, I think, and that thing doesn’t stop again.
Click to expand...
The winning coach refused a running clock.
 
MarkOU said:
also went for a 2-point conversion while up 104-0.
Click to expand...

Blackshirts BLVD said:
Agreed.

Nebraska has take many ass whoopings the past decade that I wish didn't happen, but if you don't want them to score on you, then don't let them.
Click to expand...

serious question - when Kansas rolled 76 on Nebraska.... weren't you secretly cheering for them to score 100??? I didn't give a shit. I thought it was funny as hell. at a certain point..
 
huskers1217 said:
serious question - when Kansas rolled 76 on Nebraska.... weren't you secretly cheering for them to score 100??? I didn't give a shit. I thought it was funny as hell. at a certain point..
Click to expand...
No, but I am sure I stopped watching at some point lol.
 
RP-29 said:
Maybe. It's circumstantial.

When my daughter was in 7th grade, I coached the school's 7th & 8th grade girls basketball team. There were only SEVEN girls on my team. One of them happened to be a really good basketball player (point guard) and I built our entire offense around her talents. When we played our cross-town rivals in their gym, we opened up a healthy double-digit lead and I later took some shit from parents for not benching her in the 4th Q. Those parents apparently didn't notice that I had a grand total of TWO subs and no one else on the team had anything close to resembling ball-handling skills.

I didn't look into the circumstances behind this 106-pt football game, but I'm not painting all situations like this with one paintbrush and color. Maybe it was small school versus small school and bench options were limited.
Click to expand...

You built an entire 7th grade offense around one player?!? That's not coaching, dude. That team got to high school and came up against teams that could stop that one player and couldn't do shit about it
 
RP-29 said:
The objective of any sport is to win as much as possible. Now the coach may have taken "winning" to "Hitler" levels here, but saying he didn't do his job is false.
Click to expand...
Winning 70-0 is winning. Winning 106-0 is embarrassing to both the winning coach and the players. There is absolutely nothing about his coaching job that will overcome that. The guy is trash and he is training trash people.
 
fishinabarrel said:
You built an entire 7th grade offense around one player?!? That's not coaching, dude. That team got to high school and came up against teams that could stop that one player and couldn't do shit about it
Click to expand...
That's not coaching, huh? Adjusting your strategies to match your player talent IS coaching.

Let me reiterate: I had SEVEN girls on the basketball team. One of them (a 7th grader) was an actual basketball player, three of them had mild interest in basketball but minimal talent and three were there because their friends were on the team. That's rather often what you're going to get with a small school girls team. I managed to get that team to the 6th seed in the conference tournament and to the Consolation game.

The following year when that one good ballplayer was an 8th grader, the coach of that team shoehorned that same player into a generic offensive system. His team finished 10th in the conference and was eliminated from the conference tournament without a win.

And it's not like my offense was attempting to iso that one good player every time down the floor; the whole team was involved in the offensive gameplan. Offensive possession in basketball starts with the PG and the PG was my best player; so I built different ways to make her the engine of the offense.
 
RP-29 said:
Maybe. It's circumstantial.

When my daughter was in 7th grade, I coached the school's 7th & 8th grade girls basketball team. There were only SEVEN girls on my team. One of them happened to be a really good basketball player (point guard) and I built our entire offense around her talents. When we played our cross-town rivals in their gym, we opened up a healthy double-digit lead and I later took some shit from parents for not benching her in the 4th Q. Those parents apparently didn't notice that I had a grand total of TWO subs and no one else on the team had anything close to resembling ball-handling skills.

I didn't look into the circumstances behind this 106-pt football game, but I'm not painting all situations like this with one paintbrush and color. Maybe it was small school versus small school and bench options were limited.
Click to expand...
If you’re still chucking 3’s in the last seconds of a bball game up double digits I’d think your a douche. No subs I get it but going for 2 in this sitch is a douchebag move under any circumstance
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
The winning coach refused a running clock.
Click to expand...
I would’ve supported someone from the losing side cheapshotting him too.

Targetting, right to the face, with the crown of the helmet.

Then smashing out the front windshield of his ride. And buttfucking his wife.

Still time to accomplish a couple of those.
 
Going Myles Garrett in this situation, also okay.

3FA4B3F0-000A-4FC4-9791-B666899FA6D2.gif
 
I don't give a damn about the score. But games like that do absolutely nothing good for the losing team OR the winning team. Having an open date would have been more beneficial for both IMHO.
 
RP-29 said:
That's not coaching, huh? Adjusting your strategies to match your player talent IS coaching.

Let me reiterate: I had SEVEN girls on the basketball team. One of them (a 7th grader) was an actual basketball player, three of them had mild interest in basketball but minimal talent and three were there because their friends were on the team. That's rather often what you're going to get with a small school girls team. I managed to get that team to the 6th seed in the conference tournament and to the Consolation game.

The following year when that one good ballplayer was an 8th grader, the coach of that team shoehorned that same player into a generic offensive system. His team finished 10th in the conference and was eliminated from the conference tournament without a win.

And it's not like my offense was attempting to iso that one good player every time down the floor; the whole team was involved in the offensive gameplan. Offensive possession in basketball starts with the PG and the PG was my best player; so I built different ways to make her the engine of the offense.
Click to expand...

Dude, a freaking monkey can win at a young age level with a talented player. Congrats, I guess.

You recognized that you only had one player that could handle the ball and your response was to design an offense around her instead of, I don't know, teaching someone else to handle the damn ball
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top