Poll HooplaNation's All-Time Greatest CFB Coaches Tourney - 2 Bryant vs 7 Hayes

Who do you think has/had a better CFB coaching career?


  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .
Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Posts
9,490
Reaction score
15,408
Bookie:
$ 447.00
The winner of this round advances to the semifinals and faces the winner of Osborne/Switzer (Matchup #15). The loser will face Eddie Robinson in Elimination Round 2.

Poll is open for 4 days

Quarterfinals | Week 8

Matchup #15 (link) - #3 Tom Osborne vs #6 seed Barry Switzer
Matchup #16 (This thread) - #2 seed Bear Bryant vs #7 seed Woody Hayes

Coach16.jpg

 
Both should be knocked for claiming illegitimate natties, but Bear had more legit claims.
 
Both should be knocked for claiming illegitimate natties, but Bear had more legit claims.
All 6 of Bear's are AP and / or UPI: 1961 AP and UPI, 1964 AP and UPI, 1965 AP, 1973 UPI, 1978 AP and 1979 AP and UPI. You might not like how, when, where or why the AP / UPI vote was taken, but they are all as legitimate as any other AP and / or UPI National Championship. Every single school that has won either an AP and / or UPI National Championship claims it as they should.
 
All 6 of Bear's are AP and / or UPI: 1961 AP and UPI, 1964 AP and UPI, 1965 AP, 1973 UPI, 1978 AP and 1979 AP and UPI. You might not like how, when, where or why the AP / UPI vote was taken, but they are all as legitimate as any other AP and / or UPI National Championship. Every single school that has won either an AP and / or UPI National Championship claims it as they should.
64 and I think 73 aren’t legit. 78 is iffy with USC having the H2H win too, but they have a case, so I’ll allow it.But he should be able to claim 1950 and 1966, so he’d still have the same amount of valid claims in my metric, just one less at Bama.
 
64 and I think 73 aren’t legit. 78 is iffy with USC having the H2H win too, but they have a case, so I’ll allow it.But he should be able to claim 1950 and 1966, so he’d still have the same amount of valid claims in my metric, just one less at Bama.
Yes, they are legit AP and / or UPI National Championships by the rules of the selectors in the given years. You might not like the how, what, when, where or why of the AP and / or UPI in the given years through today's eyes, but the AP and the UPI voted, and they crowned their National Champions in the given years.

You either value the AP and / or the UPI as selectors, or you don't. I'm not arguing for Bryant or Alabama but that the AP and UPI were legitimate selectors of their day in the 6 years one or both named Alabama their National Champion in the Bryant Era.
 
Last edited:
Yes, they are legit AP and / or UPI National Championships by the rules of the selectors in the given years. You might not like the how, what, when, where or why of the AP and / or UPI in the given years through today's eyes, but the AP and the UPI voted, and they crowned their National Champions in the given years.

You either value the AP and / or the UPI as selectors, or you don't. I'm not arguing for Bryant or Alabama but that the AP and UPI were legitimate selectors of their day in the 6 years one or both named Alabama their National Champion in the Bryant Era.
I don’t value the AP or UPI. I value the resumes of the teams and making my own decisions. Everyone considers Arkansas to be the 64 champs.
 
I don’t value the AP or UPI. I value the resumes of the teams and making my own decisions. Everyone considers Arkansas to be the 64 champs.
Fair enough that you do not value the AP or the UPI.
 
Fair enough that you do not value the AP or the UPI.
I mean, the fact it took a lot of egg on their faces to finally fix their criteria to count bowl games makes it easy to discredit them
 
I mean, the fact it took a lot of egg on their faces to finally fix their criteria to count bowl games makes it easy to discredit them
I get and understand that. It has been much better since 1975 - when every AP and UPI (Coaches) National Champion has Bowled and Won.

1974 Oklahoma is the last team to win an AP or UPI (Coaches) National Championship without winning a Bowl Game. They won the AP without Bowling due to Probation. FWIW, I value AP and UPI (Coaches) National Champions from today more than from previous Eras with different rules too, but they are still the legit AP - UPI (Coaches) National Champion if named so by the rules of the day. Some schools (Notre Dame) didn't Bowl for decades. Some Conferences only allowed one team a year with a no repeat clause (B1G and Pac), and some loved Bowling (SEC).

Personally, I think more highly of 1945 Alabama (Undefeated, Untied, Uncrowned Rose Bowl Champion) and 1966 Alabama (Undefeated, Untied, Uncrowned Sugar Bowl Champion) over any team from that era that won an AP or UPI National Championship with a loss and / or not Bowling at all, but that does not make those two Alabama teams a National Champion or devalue the AP and / or UPI National Champions from those two years (1945 Army and 1966 Notre Dame). I also put 1964 Alabama and 1973 Alabama lower on the National Champion worthy totem pole, but they still won the vote by the rules of the day.

Army is the legitimate AP National Champion in 1945 (undefeated, Untied without Bowling), and Notre Dame is the legitimate AP and UPI National Champion in 1966 (with a tie and not Bowling). I don't have to like it, but they have the Trophies. They are legitimate.
 
Last edited:
I get and understand that. It has been much better since 1975 - when every AP and UPI (Coaches) National Champion has Bowled and Won.

1974 Oklahoma is the last team to win an AP or UPI (Coaches) National Championship without winning a Bowl Game. They won the AP without Bowling due to Probation. FWIW, I value AP and UPI (Coaches) National Champions from today more than from previous Eras with different rules too, but they are still the legit AP - UPI (Coaches) National Champion if named so by the rules of the day. Some schools (Notre Dame) didn't Bowl for decades. Some Conferences only allowed one team a year with a no repeat clause (B1G and Pac), and some loved Bowling (SEC).

Personally, I think more highly of 1945 Alabama (Undefeated, Untied, Uncrowned Rose Bowl Champion) and 1966 Alabama (Undefeated, Untied, Uncrowned Sugar Bowl Champion) over any team from that era that won an AP or UPI National Championship with a loss and / or not Bowling at all, but that does not make those two Alabama teams a National Champion or devalue the AP and / or UPI National Champions from those two years (1945 Army and 1966 Notre Dame). I also put 1964 Alabama and 1973 Alabama lower on the National Champion worthy totem pole, but they still won the vote by the rules of the day.

Army is the legitimate AP National Champion in 1945 (undefeated, Untied without Bowling), and Notre Dame is the legitimate AP and UPI National Champion in 1966 (with a tie and not Bowling). I don't have to like it, but they have the Trophies. They are legitimate.
They’re only legit if you let others think for you. You gotta look and the infor and decide for yourself. 1950 Oklahoma and 1964 Bama should be ashamed at themselves for claiming
 
They’re only legit if you let others think for you. You gotta look and the infor and decide for yourself. 1950 Oklahoma and 1964 Bama should be ashamed at themselves for claiming
I get your point, but that is cherry picking. There is a difference between legit and being worthy. You are talking about being a worthy champion through today's eyes. Back in the day, Oklahoma in 1950 and Alabama in 1964 were considered worthy Champions, as there were only a few Bowl Games, many teams / conferences didn't participate due to it literally being a vacation game. There was a reason the National Champion in both the AP and UPI were voted on after the Regular Season.

FWIW, If OU hadn't Bowled in 1950 or Alabama hadn't Bowled in 1964, nobody would have batted an eye and this wouldn't even be an issue - unless you want to consider all of the National Champions from that era who didn't Bowl at all to be illegitimate too. If that is the case, the number will really become skewed. FWIW, Every single Alabama AP / UPI National Championship was in a year when the Tide Bowled (regardless of whether the final vote was before or after the Bowl).

Personally, I think that only Undefeated, Untied Bowl Teams are truly worthy (not contesting legitimacy). Using that logic, Alabama leads the way with 10 (1925, 1930, 1934, 1945, 1961, 1966, 1979, 1992, 2009 and 2020). Penn State is next (1968, 1969, 1973, 1986 and 1994). Then, there are the others. Let the Trophies fall where they may!
 
I get your point, but that is cherry picking. There is a difference between legit and being worthy. You are talking about being a worthy champion through today's eyes. Back in the day, Oklahoma in 1950 and Alabama in 1964 were considered worthy Champions, as there were only a few Bowl Games, many teams / conferences didn't participate due to it literally being a vacation game. There was a reason the National Champion in both the AP and UPI were voted on after the Regular Season.

FWIW, If OU hadn't Bowled in 1950 or Alabama hadn't Bowled in 1964, nobody would have batted an eye and this wouldn't even be an issue - unless you want to consider all of the National Champions from that era who didn't Bowl at all to be illegitimate too. If that is the case, the number will really become skewed. FWIW, Every single Alabama AP / UPI National Championship was in a year when the Tide Bowled (regardless of whether the final vote was before or after the Bowl).

Personally, I think that only Undefeated, Untied Bowl Teams are worthy. Using that logic, Alabama leads the way with 10 (1925, 1930, 1934, 1945, 1961, 1966, 1979, 1992, 2009 and 2020). Penn State is next (1968, 1969, 1973, 1986 and 1994). Then, there are the others. Let the Trophies fall where thy may!
I have zero issues with any undefeated, untied team claiming a natty(other than 1997 Michigan because their conference agreed to a bowl contract that would prevent many 1-2 bowl matchups, and they don't get a pass for that). Back in the day when there wasn't a system in place for a NCG, all we can really argue about with multiple undefeated teams in the same year is resume, but that really doesn't tell us which team was better(head to head doesn't always either, but it's an important part of a resume). Even if there had been no bowls, Arkansas would have had a legit claim, but after bowls, Bama should have just handed over the trophy, because everyone knows Arkansas is the 1964 champs.
 
I have zero issues with any undefeated, untied team claiming a natty(other than 1997 Michigan because their conference agreed to a bowl contract that would prevent many 1-2 bowl matchups, and they don't get a pass for that). Back in the day when there wasn't a system in place for a NCG, all we can really argue about with multiple undefeated teams in the same year is resume, but that really doesn't tell us which team was better(head to head doesn't always either, but it's an important part of a resume). Even if there had been no bowls, Arkansas would have had a legit claim, but after bowls, Bama should have just handed over the trophy, because everyone knows Arkansas is the 1964 champs.
Arkansas was the 1964 FWAA National Champion.
Alabama was the 1964 AP and UPI National Champion.

Arkansas was more worthy if you count the Bowl Games (which the AP and UPI (Coaches) did not that season). Every single school that has won an AP and / or UPI (Coaches) National Championship counts it even if they didn't Bowl and / or Bowled and loss. This list includes Oklahoma, Tennessee, Maryland Auburn, Minnesota, Notre Dame, Michigan State, Notre Dame and Texas among others.

Times change. A team will not win an AP and / or UPI (Coaches) National Championship in this Era without Bowling or losing their Bowl. However, teams that won an AP and / or UPI (Coaches) National Championship in a year when the didn't Bowl or Bowled and lost does not vacate that National Championship or make it illegitimate.

Once again being worthy and being legitimate are two different things.

Round and Round we go.

:)
 
Arkansas was the 1964 FWAA National Champion.
Alabama was the 1964 AP and UPI National Champion.

Arkansas was more worthy if you count the Bowl Games (which the AP and UPI (Coaches) did not that season). Every single school that has won an AP and / or UPI (Coaches) National Championship counts it even if they didn't Bowl and / or Bowled and loss. This list includes Oklahoma, Tennessee, Maryland Auburn, Minnesota, Notre Dame, Michigan State, Notre Dame and Texas among others.

Times change. A team will not win an AP and / or UPI (Coaches) National Championship in this Era without Bowling or losing their Bowl. However, teams that won an AP and / or UPI (Coaches) National Championship in a year when the didn't Bowl or Bowled and loss does not vacate that National Championship or make it illegitimate.

Once again being worthy and being legitimate are two different things.

Round and Round we go.

:)
That's fair with worth vs legitimate. I'll start using worthy from now on.
 
Went homer pick bc I knew it wouldn't matter
 
Top