I love that Michigan did this

"Stop talking about 1997 while I keep talking about 1997" - Michigan fans
I only talked about 97 when your insecurity brought it up. I’m not insecure about our national title because ours wasn’t awarded by coaches to a retiring coach undeservingly.
 
I only talked about 97 when your insecurity brought it up. I’m not insecure about our national title because ours wasn’t awarded by coaches to a retiring coach undeservingly.

I didn't bring it up, dumbass.

I was on point to the subject matter of the thread.
 
What does any of that have to do with 1997?

It's meant to distract from 1997 because... The ONLY argument Michigan fans have about 1997 is the transitive property where Michigan played the two common opponents in Ann Arbor (OOC) and Nebraska played them both on the road (In Conference).
It is why this discussion keeps coming up, because Nebraska fans have nothing else to talk about and will likely not have anything else to talk about for a long, long time, other than blaming the next coach you hire.

As for your comment about 1997, All I read is -- excuse, excuse, excuse, excuse. We would have dominated those teams, but............yeah, Michigan beat those teams more convincingly, but.............then it goes back to, well, look what we did against the teams you DID NOT PLAY. :facepalm:

How is this -- Nebraska is the sole national champ in 1997. Feel better. Now go buy a Michigan shirt so you can cheer on a B1G team in the CFP tomorrow.
 
Is it safe to say these messages refer to 1997 … started by your boys?

Not by me though.

Funny how y'all dove right in instead of taking your own advise to "stop talking about it".

Why don't you clowns STFU about it first? You can't.
 
It is why this discussion keeps coming up, because Nebraska fans have nothing else to talk about and will likely not have anything else to talk about for a long, long time, other than blaming the next coach you hire.

As for your comment about 1997, All I read is -- excuse, excuse, excuse, excuse. We would have dominated those teams, but............yeah, Michigan beat those teams more convincingly, but.............then it goes back to, well, look what we did against the teams you DID NOT PLAY. :facepalm:

How is this -- Nebraska is the sole national champ in 1997. Feel better. Now go buy a Michigan shirt so you can cheer on a B1G team in the CFP tomorrow.

Oh. Look who's back?

TrustMeIAmRight

vinyl-records-record-collection.gif
 
I think, as a whole, OSU is a better team than Michigan -- it is why they were a 7.5 favorite. They are just soft as hell on defense,
But using your logic, the common opponents scored 42% more points against Michigan’s defense.

Sorry, dog, you’re tied up in a knot here and I’m done.
 
I'd tell Michigan fans to act like they're been there before, but it's been so long that their dads and grandpas haven't taught them how to act
 
I'd tell Michigan fans to act like they're been there before, but it's been so long that their dads and grandpas haven't taught them how to act
Oh the irony of a Wisconsin fan telling someone to act like they've been there before, like they'd even have a clue how one would act, as Wisconsin football has never "been there". :shrug:
 
Current B10 champs?
I didn’t realize that when you wrote, “National championships have never been our #1 priority, even though we win a lot of them,” you actually meant B1G championships.

Even still, UoM has 3 B1G championships over the last twenty years. That’s one more than Iowa!
 
I didn’t realize that when you wrote, “National championships have never been our #1 priority, even though we win a lot of them,” you actually meant B1G championships.

Even still, UoM has 3 B1G championships over the last twenty years. That’s one more than Iowa!
Of the last 3 national titles won in the b10, Michigan has one of them?
 
Back
Top