Is Georgia Texas

[Rolltide94]

You marching up a hill?

It's a simple argument, name a better team over the last 3 years that isn't named Alabama, LSU or Clemson or STFU.

 

[Angry Red]

Red Alert?

EABOLD

 

[Angry Red]

It's a simple argument, name a better team over the last 3 years that isn't named Alabama, LSU or Clemson or STFU.

Why 3 years?

 

[CoalTrain]

I'm going to consume an edible and come back and try to make sense of this

 

[Illustrious Potentate]

It's a simple argument, name a better team over the last 3 years that isn't named Alabama, LSU or Clemson or STFU.

Ohio State.

You could make an argument for Oklahoma too, I don't think they've been better, but an argument could be made.

But that's a huge step up from the first part of the decade.

 

[Angry Red]

It's a simple argument, name a better team over the last 3 years that isn't named Alabama, LSU or Clemson or STFU.

I implied a timeframe larger than 3 years. I created the thread. I set time frames. 3 years is a strange time frame. But I will play.

Is it Jimmy or Joes? Head coach and staff or talent?

 

[Angry Red]

Nah, this dude has the same name at SH. His gimmick is very common. Dime a dozen.

Explain

 

[Illustrious Potentate]

Explain

Your shtick has been done before.

 

[Rolltide94]

Why 3 years?

I was thinking that was the Kirby era, but he started in 2016, so same argument but 4 years. I'm making the argument that they are turning the corner, I don't think you can make the same argument for Texas.

 

[Rolltide94]

Ohio State.

You could make an argument for Oklahoma too, I don't think they've been better, but an argument could be made.

But that's a huge step up from the first part of the decade.

What has Ohio State done in the last 3-4 years. Two playoff appearances, two losses including getting blasted 31-0 by Clemson....not better.

 

[Angry Red]

Yeah, Georgia and Texas is a good comparison. Both underachieve with the talent at their disposal.

But Nebraska and Minnesota are good a comparison. Has been programs that used to be great, but are now dead and they're never coming back.

It would be ironic, if I could recognize your feelings, but Georgia doesn't win their division.

 

[Angry Red]

He he

 

[Angry Red]

Yeah, Georgia and Texas is a good comparison. Both underachieve with the talent at their disposal.

But Nebraska and Minnesota are good a comparison. Has been programs that used to be great, but are now dead and they're never coming back.

Hmmm? You are exceptionally dense, correct?

 

[duckboy33]

I’m back and the OP is still nonsense. The edible didn’t help

 

[Illustrious Potentate]

Hmmm? You are exceptionally dense, correct?

Nah, it's just easy to spot a dead program. Nebraska, Minnesota, Pitt, Michigan, etc.

 

[Angry Red]

Your shtick has been done before.

Am I wrong?

 

[Wishbone]

So does this mean Nebraska was Kansas before Kansas was Kansas?

 

[Angry Red]

Nah, it's just easy to spot a dead program. Nebraska, Minnesota, Pitt, Michigan, etc.

How do you judge the success of a progra?. I think it is much different than mine.

 

[Angry Red]

So does this mean Nebraska was Kansas before Kansas was Kansas?

It means no Big 12 teams in the playoff. Nobody wants to watch that. Be aware

 

[Illustrious Potentate]

How do you judge the success of a progra?. I think it is much different than mine.

It's opposite of Nebraska this millennium, that's for sure.