Lincoln Riley to USC

ELTEXAN said:
Yes. Both are true. TAMU is also ran, and sec def is a myth
Click to expand...
Jexas has two good years in the last 100 and their "hey I want to participate even though I never went to the fucking school" idiots run their man-pleasers. :dhd:
 
fordman84 said:
lel. Good thing y'all didn't have to face JFF. He did that to the SEC defenses, imagine what he would have done to big12-ish defenses.
Click to expand...
Well, since sec def is a myth, who knows.
Mae sent a fish QB and an also ran team to the sec, and they were the runaway offense in both their first two years.
You can analyze simple data: that means that sec didn’t run offense, not that b12 didn’t run defense.
 
ELTEXAN said:
Well, since sec def is a myth, who knows.
Mae sent a fish QB and an also ran team to the sec, and they were the runaway offense in both their first two years.
You can analyze simple data: that means that sec didn’t run offense, not that b12 didn’t run defense.
Click to expand...
Or that the SEC had to face the Heismann winner, and the carnage would have been worse against the shit Big12 defenses.
 
fordman84 said:
Jexas has two good years in the last 100 and their "hey I want to participate even though I never went to the fucking school" idiots run their man-pleasers. :dhd:
Click to expand...
Texas was the BY FAR RUNAWAY team of the 2000s of Colt DOESNT get a freak injury.
They would have been 4-0 in bcs bowls, two NCs, and more wins than any team besides BOISE.
All while beating in that run: NU OU Bama MICHIGAN tOSU



See, Even without the Bama potential win, it’s still damned impressive
 
Last edited:
fordman84 said:
Or that the SEC had to face the Heismann winner, and the carnage would have been worse against the shit Big12 defenses.
Click to expand...
Yes. He was the Heisman winner because he got to play against???? You can say it???? Cmon… drumroll OVERHYPED SEC DEFENSES
 
ELTEXAN said:
Texas was the BY FAR RUNAWAY team of the 2000s of Colt DOESNT get a freak injury.
They would have been 4-0 in bcs bowls, two NCs, and more wins than any team besides BOISE.
All while beating in that run: OU Bama MICHIGAN tOSU



See, Even without the Bama potential win, it’s still damned impressive
Click to expand...
I'm sure you feel what you just said was true. It isn't, but you also feel a connection to a school you never attended.
 
ELTEXAN said:
Texas was the BY FAR RUNAWAY team of the 2000s of Colt DOESNT get a freak injury.
They would have been 4-0 in bcs bowls, two NCs, and more wins than any team besides BOISE.
All while beating in that run: OU Bama MICHIGAN tOSU



See, Even without the Bama potential win, it’s still damned impressive
Click to expand...

USC went 6-1 in BCS Bowls, with 2 NCs in the 2000s.

Your mythical scenarios don't change the facts.
 
ELTEXAN said:
Yes. He was the Heisman winner because he got to play against???? You can say it???? Cmon… drumroll OVERHYPED SEC DEFENSES
Click to expand...
And then he ran a train on the Big12 champion. Remember?
 
fordman84 said:
I'm sure you feel what you just said was true. It isn't, but you also feel a connection to a school you never attended.
Click to expand...
Literal facts.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
USC went 6-1 in BCS Bowls, with 2 NCs in the 2000s.
Click to expand...
Must be because they didn't have a QB whose daddy wouldn't let him play because he over valued his midget sons draft position.
 
fordman84 said:
Must be because they didn't have a QB whose daddy wouldn't let him play because he over valued his midget sons draft position.
Click to expand...
Don’t talk about Chris Simms that way. Only I can do that
 
fordman84 said:
Swing and a miss. Did Simms even play in a natty?
Click to expand...
He was supposed to except he made four turnovers in one half in a CCG… before leaving with a truly minor injury… in the 2000s, the decade in question.
 
ELTEXAN said:
He was supposed to except he made four turnovers in one half in a CCG… before leaving with a truly minor injury… in the 2000s, the decade in question.
Click to expand...
The decade you are trying to limit things to, not me. Take your special brand of t-shirt wearing bullshit elsewhere.
 
fordman84 said:
The decade you are trying to limit things to, not me. Take your special brand of t-shirt wearing bullshit elsewhere.
Click to expand...
It’s called a cheer jersey.
unless you’re trying to call me a T-shirt fan? In which case, good luck with that lie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top