Lincoln Riley to USC

michaeljordan_fan said:
Oregon destroyed Utah 2 years ago, and got destroyed this year.

Let's not pretend that things can't change very quickly.
Click to expand...
Pete was 6-6 in his first year. Riley is no Pete.
 
TigerBait1971 said:
Proud to say that is correct.
Click to expand...
3 natties this millennium. Only one blue blood can claim as many or more. Being a blue blood means nothing when it comes to winning today. Hell, there’s a real chance that the playoffs this season won’t feature a single blue blood
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
3 natties this millennium. Only one blue blood can claim as many or more. Being a blue blood means nothing when it comes to winning today. Hell, there’s a real chance that the playoffs this season won’t feature a single blue blood
Click to expand...
GA fan, confirmed.
 
michaeljordan_fan said:
Riley has more talent on the roster than Pete had.

Also, PAC was crazy good back then.
Click to expand...
roughly the same
petes 6-6 team was 2001
you had
11-1 Oregon
10-2 WSU
9-3 Stanford
8-4 Washington
7-4 UCLA

compare now
10-2 Oregon (2 games to go)
9-3 Utah (2 games to go_
8-4 UCLA and ASU (bowls to play)
7-5 WSU and Oregon State (bowls to play)
 
TigerBait1971 said:
We are new money trash, and we like it that way.
Click to expand...
College Sports Football GIF by LSU Tigers
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
Nobody brought UGA up except you

But if we win the natty this year, I bet you would unless you’re a lot older than I’m thinking
Click to expand...
u said blue blood has nothing to do with today's game.. that's why i said GA fan, confirmed
 
Thiefery said:
u said blue blood has nothing to do with today's game.. that's why i said GA fan, confirmed
Click to expand...
It doesn’t that’s why all 3 Florida schools, LSU and Clemson were able to go on runs. Half of the teams claiming blue blood status are pretty much just like Pitt and Minnesota. You what a legend is? A God damn has been
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
It doesn’t that’s why all 3 Florida schools, LSU and Clemson were able to go on runs. Half of the teams claiming blue blood status are pretty much just like Pitt and Minnesota. You what a legend is? A God damn has been
Click to expand...
still over that same period of time.. it was dominated by blue blood schools..
 
Thiefery said:
still over that same period of time.. it was dominated by blue blood schools..
Click to expand...
Was it really?

Last 40 years:

Miami- 5
LSU- 3
Florida- 3
FSU- 3
Clemson- 3
Penn State- 2
Tennessee- 1
Auburn- 1
Georgia Tech- 1
BYU- 1

That’s more than blue bloods have accounted for in that time
 
Illustrious Potentate said:
Was it really?

Last 40 years:

Miami- 5
LSU- 3
Florida- 3
FSU- 3
Clemson- 3
Penn State- 2
Tennessee- 1
Auburn- 1
Georgia Tech- 1
BYU- 1

That’s more than blue bloods have accounted for in that time
Click to expand...
wait where's tosu, USC, Bama, NU, UT, ou, UM at??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top