- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Posts
- 7,105
- Reaction score
- 15,687
- Bookie:
- $ 13,200.00




Home, Away, Neutral fields don't matter?
Rivals, Conference, Non-Conference opponents don't matter?
You want to conveniently ignore those points.
^ Yeah, that too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Home, Away, Neutral fields don't matter?
Rivals, Conference, Non-Conference opponents don't matter?
You want to conveniently ignore those points.
Yeah -- that's why Colorado put up 250 yards more offense and 21 more points against Nebraska than they did against Michigan, because it was at Colorado.Home, Away, Neutral fields don't matter?
Rivals, Conference, Non-Conference opponents don't matter?
You want to conveniently ignore those points.
You mean, Heisman loser Peyton Manning?1997 Nebraska shut down Peyton Manning.
Sorry, no way Michigan beats Peyton Manning led Tennessee.
It is amazing in 2022 you are still trying to win a game that was never played, and was never supposed to be played. In 1997, the Winner of the PAC 10 and the Winner of the Big 10 played in the Rose Bowl. They had since 1919 until 2002 when Nebraska lost to University of Miami.I used 1997 Washington (Nebraska opponent) and Washington State (Michigan opponent).
Nebraska beat Washington 27-14 in Seattle. (13 pts)
Michigan beat Washington St 21-16 on a neutral field. (5 pts)
1997
Washington beat Arizona St (26-14)
Arizona St beat Washington State (44-31)
Nebraska was 25 points better than Michigan.
Actually, the B1G tie-in didnt start until the Jan. 1947 Game.It is amazing in 2022 you are still trying to win a game that was never played, and was never supposed to be played. In 1997, the Winner of the PAC 10 and the Winner of the Big 10 played in the Rose Bowl. They had since 1919 until 2002 when Nebraska lost to University of Miami.
The 2002 Rose Bowl, played on January 3, 2002, was a college football bowl game. It was the 88th Rose Bowl game and was the BCS National Championship Game of the 2001 college football season. The game featured the Miami Hurricanes and the Nebraska Cornhuskers, marking the first time since the 1919 Rose Bowl, and only the third time in the game's history, that neither the Big Ten nor the Pac-10 Conferences had a representative in this game. The Hurricanes won the game, 37–14, for their fifth national title.[3] Miami quarterback Ken Dorsey and wide receiver Andre Johnson were named the Rose Bowl Players of the Game.[4]
2002 Rose Bowl - Wikipedia
Do you watch Wapner at 5?1970
#3 Nebraska (10-0-1) beat #5 LSU (9-2) in the Orange Bowl and were the only undefeated team to finish the season.
#1 Texas (10-0) lost the Cotton Bowl (11-24) to #6 Notre Dame.
#2 Ohio St (9-0) lost the Rose Bowl (17-27) to #12 Stanford.
#4 Tennessee (10-1) SEC champ beat #11 Air Force in the Sugar Bowl.
I support your point in that #1 Texas should have played #2 Ohio St for the Natty.
i.e. With Ohio St hiding in the Rose Bowl vs a PAC 10 opponent, Nebraska back doored their way to the NC.
1971
#1 Nebraska (12-0) beat #2 Alabama (11-0) 38-6 in the Orange Bowl.
#1 Nebraska had already beaten #3 Oklahoma.
#4 Michigan (11-0) hid in the Rose bowl and lost to #16 Stanford.
That would have been a legit Natty for Nebraska in either the Bowl Coalition, Bowl Alliance, or BCS.
1994
#1 Nebraska (12-0) beat #3 Miami (10-1) in the Orange Bowl
#2 Penn St (11-0) beat #12 Oregon (9-3) in the Rose Bowl
#4 Colorado had already lost to Nebraska and finished the season AP #3.
I support your point that #1 Nebraska should have played #2 Penn St for the Natty.
However, instead of joining the Bowl Coalition, the Big 10 was (once again) hiding in the Rose Bowl against a lesser opponent.
1995
#1 Nebraska (11-0) beat #2 Florida (12-0) in the Fiesta Bowl.
#3 Northwestern hid in the Rose Bowl and lost to #17 USC.
#4 Tennessee (10-1) beat #5 Ohio St in the Citrus Bowl.
#2 Florida had already beaten #4 Tennessee 62-37
That would have been a legit Natty for Nebraska in either the Bowl Coalition, Bowl Alliance, or BCS.
1997
#1 Michigan (11-0) beat #8 Washington St (10 - 1) in the Rose Bowl
#2 Nebraska (12-0) beat #3 Tennessee (11-1) in the Orange Bowl
#4 Florida St (10-1) beat #9 Ohio St (10-2) in the Sugar Bowl
I support your point that #1 Michigan should have played #2 Nebraska for the Natty.
However, instead of joining the Bowl Coalition, the Big 10 was (once again) hiding in the Rose Bowl against a lesser opponent.
There is a clear pattern of Big 10 teams hiding in the Rose Bowl against lesser opponents.
1970: #2 Ohio St vs #12 Stanford (loss)
1971: #4 Michigan vs #16 Stanford (loss)
1994: #2 Penn St vs #12 Oregon (win)
1995: #3 Northwestern vs #17 USC (loss)
1997: #1 Michigan vs #8 Washington St (win)
Average Big 10 Rose Bowl opponent ranking: #13
On the other hand....
1970: #3 Nebraska vs #5 LSU (win)
1971: #1 Nebraska vs #2 Alabama (win)
1994: #1 Nebraska vs #3 Miami (win)
1995: #1 Nebraska vs #2 Florida (win)
1997: #2 Nebraska vs #3 Tennessee (win)
Average Nebraska all bowls opponent ranking: #3
That is just for the 5 Nebraska NC's. I'm sure you'd see a similar pattern of the Big 10 hiding in the Rose Bowl for all years regarding NC's pre-CFP.
Noooo, there is like 9 pages now?So
Everyone is on the same page now.
Do you watch Wapner at 5?
Not sure what that means? Let's re-direct.Did Wapner facts cause you emotional pain?
Not sure what that means? Let's re-direct.
Do you have footie pajamas with little corns all over them?
If you ever call me a homo perv I will fuck you right in the assWhat are you, some kind of homo perv?
What's next, request for PM'd dick pics?