NCAA still allowing men to participate on women teams

Just outrageously disingenuous to frame the anti-trans movement as a ‘disagreement’. Rowling hasn’t been vilified, she’s only experienced the consequences of being a hateful cunt that uses her wealth and social reach to endlessly attack/lie about trans folk.
:spit: :rofl:


iu



and im proud of it stockard channing GIF


Captain America Lol GIF by mtv
 
Are you under the impression that all cis women hate trans women as much as you or Rowling do? That’s really silly.
I don’t hate trans women at all. I just know they aren’t actually women. Rowling has said the same. Thinking otherwise is really silly.
 
If they just want to live their lives, then they should do that.
Except you just listed off a bunch of ways in which them living their lives is unacceptable, pick a lane.
 
Nope, a normal person who respects trans people, but isn't a weirdo like you that want men to compete with women, want to mutilate children, and want trans women with dicks to share bathrooms and lockerroom. I am not a bigot, but you are a groomer creep.
You don’t hate them, you just think they are weirdo groomer creeps who want to mutilate children? Lol
 
Except you just listed off a bunch of ways in which them living their lives is unacceptable, pick a lane.
He picked a lane. A reasonable one. They can do whatever they want with their lives, but don’t ask others to participate in their mental illness. Don’t expect your rights to supersede someone else’s.
 
I don’t hate trans women at all. I just know they aren’t actually women. Rowling has said the same. Thinking otherwise is really silly.
She’s gone as far as Nazi apologia just to attack trans folk lol
 
Except you just listed off a bunch of ways in which them living their lives is unacceptable, pick a lane.
I have picked my lane. They can live their lives within what should be legally and morally right. Where they don't do that I side against them and their supporters like you, and that has nothing to being a transphobe or bigot. Because you can't read or comprehend:

- I will support women athletes who should have to compete against a biological male who is inherently and physical superior to them. We separate women and men in competition for a reason. You want to take away that space for women. So, I stand with women.

- I will support children who don't have the cognitive ability to understand what they want to be when they grow up, so I will stand against butchering them, and giving them life altering treatment until they are of the age they can do that. The rest of the world stands with me. You support Mengele-style experimentation.

- I will stand with women and girls who don't want a man with his dick hanging out changing in their locker rooms and restrooms just because they think they are a woman.

Other than that, they can do whatever they want. Be a woman, dress in dresses, steal luggage (subject to arrest, of course), do whatever you want until, as I have said multiple times, you infringe on others.
 
You don’t hate them, you just think they are weirdo groomer creeps who want to mutilate children? Lol
You really don't have any reading comprehension, do you? I think you and they are groomer creeps IF they partake of the three things I have listed multiple times. I have noticed that you haven't addressed a single one of those issues. Far easier to just call people transphobes and bigots. If the want to just live there lives, most others would be fine with that. But you don't want them to just live their lives, you want to force women and others to sacrifice the opportunities they have fought for for decades.
 
Trans women do not have unfair advantages and this is sports we are talking about, not securing the basic needs of all people.
You mean biological men.. no such thing as trans women. It's really just science. Male or female there are only 2 sexes. A mentally ill person is just mentally ill.
 
You mean biological men.. no such thing as trans women. It's really just science. Male or female there are only 2 sexes. A mentally ill person is just mentally ill.
@Selkies ftw if you disagree, you are a misogynist. See how that works?
 
Davidson - not an Olympian, began transitioning in early 20s
Lancaster - not an Olympian, barely ever competed professionally (no success to note), transitioned at 60 (aging process was well underway)
Manuel - was an Olympian as a woman before transitioning but not after, fought in flyweight against bottom-tier boxers who are far smaller than normal men, began transition in her mid 20s
Mosier - was an Olympic "race-walker", no real accomplishments of note
Ivy - not an Olympian, transitioned at 30, didn't achieve any success until he started competing against women

These are the best examples you have to defend your point?
goal posts moved got it
 
You're missing the point. They're not for me, but I've got nothing against drag shows. To each their own. That said, traditionally drag shows are raunchy, adult-themed entertainment that was never meant for kids. To suddenly start acting like this is totally normal (even in events where we've seen kids dancing for dollars, which is revolting) is absolute bullshit from the left, and anyone who disagrees with it is acting completely reasonable.
Drag queens reading books. they are not drag shows.
 
Drag queens reading books. they are not drag shows.
It all depends on if it is something that the kids chose to attend with parental permission, and whether it is sexualized. I've seen drag queen performances with kids in attendance where if the parent took her kids to a strip club they would be taken away. So it all depends on the context.
 
Back
Top