NCAA still allowing men to participate on women teams

Across The Field said:
We get it, you hate women and want men to invade their spaces.
Click to expand...
lmao what a drama queen. There’s a whole lot of folks on here who truly hate women but I’m not one of them.
 
Selkies ftw said:
Trans women do not have unfair advantages and this is sports we are talking about, not securing the basic needs of all people.
Click to expand...
Don't be a science denier. Physiologically men are stronger, bigger, and faster than women. Anyone that has played any sport knows that. You need to touch grass more often. Touching a genetically-female-boob would probably help, too.
 


The greatest female tennis player of our generation, maybe of all generations to date, had this to say. But some soy boy terrorist sympathizing science denier knows better. :L
 
fordman84 said:
Don't be a science denier. Physiologically men are stronger, bigger, and faster than women. Anyone that has played any sport knows that. You need to touch grass more often. Touching a genetically-female-boob would probably help, too.
Click to expand...
He’s probably going to post some bullshit study that says it without thinking critically about it at all. If true, why do we have separate categories for men and women? Why is it that we don’t have women competing against men in any major sport? Why are the men’s world records better than the women’s in pretty much every sport in which they both compete?
 
The NCAA is obsolete. Time to replace it with the ACAA, The American Collegiate Athletic Association and in it's charter would be all the Title IX elements and a bylaw prohibiting men in women's sports. Bye bye NCAA
 
fordman84 said:
Don't be a science denier. Physiologically men are stronger, bigger, and faster than women. Anyone that has played any sport knows that. You need to touch grass more often. Touching a genetically-female-boob would probably help, too.
Click to expand...
Science ain’t on your side. Let’s check the actual science:

  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lower-body strength.
  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lung function.
  • Transgender women had a higher percentage of fat mass, lower fat-free mass, and weaker handgrip strength compared to cisgender men.
  • Transgender women’s bone density was found to be equivalent to that of cisgender women, which is linked to muscle strength.
  • There were no meaningful differences found between the two groups’ hemoglobin profiles. Hemoglobin (Hb) plays a crucial role in athletic performance by facilitating improved oxygen delivery to muscles. Elite endurance athletes may exhibit up to a 40% higher level of Hb compared to untrained individuals.
 
Selkies ftw said:
Science ain’t on your side. Let’s check the actual science:

  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lower-body strength.
  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lung function.
  • Transgender women had a higher percentage of fat mass, lower fat-free mass, and weaker handgrip strength compared to cisgender men.
  • Transgender women’s bone density was found to be equivalent to that of cisgender women, which is linked to muscle strength.
  • There were no meaningful differences found between the two groups’ hemoglobin profiles. Hemoglobin (Hb) plays a crucial role in athletic performance by facilitating improved oxygen delivery to muscles. Elite endurance athletes may exhibit up to a 40% higher level of Hb compared to untrained individuals.
Click to expand...
Based on your real world observations, do these conclusions ring true to you?
 
Selkies ftw said:
Personal anecdotes aren’t relevant and don’t matter.
Click to expand...

Bullshit. Studies should always be filtered against common sense (if one has any) to see if the results make sense. If not, you may want to look at the study itself. Who conducted it? What was their objective? What were their methods? Anyone can make a study saying anything they want if they manipulate the data or the inputs.
 
Selkies ftw said:
Personal anecdotes aren’t relevant and don’t matter.
Click to expand...

Ask yourself these questions:

- Why do separate categories for women exist?
- Why don’t biological women compete in professional leagues against men, particularly in light of the fact that men’s leagues generally pay much more to their participants?
- Why are men’s world records better/faster in sports played by both men and women?
 
Selkies ftw said:
Science ain’t on your side. Let’s check the actual science:

  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lower-body strength.
  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lung function.
  • Transgender women had a higher percentage of fat mass, lower fat-free mass, and weaker handgrip strength compared to cisgender men.
  • Transgender women’s bone density was found to be equivalent to that of cisgender women, which is linked to muscle strength.
  • There were no meaningful differences found between the two groups’ hemoglobin profiles. Hemoglobin (Hb) plays a crucial role in athletic performance by facilitating improved oxygen delivery to muscles. Elite endurance athletes may exhibit up to a 40% higher level of Hb compared to untrained individuals.
Click to expand...

You had a second retard sandwich for lunch, didn't you?
 
Selkies ftw said:
Science ain’t on your side. Let’s check the actual science:

  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lower-body strength.
  • Transgender women performed worse than cisgender women in tests measuring lung function.
  • Transgender women had a higher percentage of fat mass, lower fat-free mass, and weaker handgrip strength compared to cisgender men.
  • Transgender women’s bone density was found to be equivalent to that of cisgender women, which is linked to muscle strength.
  • There were no meaningful differences found between the two groups’ hemoglobin profiles. Hemoglobin (Hb) plays a crucial role in athletic performance by facilitating improved oxygen delivery to muscles. Elite endurance athletes may exhibit up to a 40% higher level of Hb compared to untrained individuals.
Click to expand...
Penn swimmer sucked as a male, couldn't even make the team. Called himself a woman and won every meet and set all their records.

Your cherry picked article is bullshit.
 
fordman84 said:
Penn swimmer sucked as a male, couldn't even make the team. Called himself a woman and won every meet and set all their records.

Your cherry picked article is bullshit.
Click to expand...
I’m 54 years old, but stay in pretty good shape. I have a couple of nephews who are 17 and 28, respectively, who aren’t in particularly good shape. I am 100% certain if we ran a 5K, I’d absolutely smoke both of them. They probably couldn’t even finish one, at least not running. We could call that a “study” that says that men in their 50’s are better runners than men in their teens and 20’s.

Retards like @Selkies ftw would take it at face value and parrot it all over the internet. Reasonable people would look at it and see it was one guy running against his fat and lazy nephews and question the conclusion.
 
fordman84 said:
Penn swimmer sucked as a male, couldn't even make the team. Called himself a woman and won every meet and set all their records.

Your cherry picked article is bullshit.
Click to expand...
If you are referring to Lia Thomas she set men’s records in 5 different categories at Penn, finished second in men’s Ivy league championships both years, and was ranked in the top 100 nationally in 3 categories. All before transitioning, and after doing so was significantly slower in every style. You don’t even know anything about the people you hate lol
 
williewilliejuan said:
I’m 54 years old, but stay in pretty good shape. I have a couple of nephews who are 17 and 28, respectively, who aren’t in particularly good shape. I am 100% certain if we ran a 5K, I’d absolutely smoke both of them. They probably couldn’t even finish one, at least not running. We could call that a “study” that says that men in their 50’s are better runners than men in their teens and 20’s.

Retards like @Selkies ftw would take it at face value and parrot it all over the internet. Reasonable people would look at it and see it was one guy running against his fat and lazy nephews and question the conclusion.
Click to expand...
You are more than welcome to repeat their methods and prove it to be wrong.
 
Selkies ftw said:
You are more than welcome to repeat their methods and prove it to be wrong.
Click to expand...
The women’s record for the 100 m dash is 10.49 seconds, a record that has stood for 37 years. That time wouldn’t get a man out of the first round. How could that be if there was no difference between biological males and biological females?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top