Poll P4 CHAMPS?

Champs?

  • Texas Clemson Oregon ISU

    Votes: 4 12.5%

  • Texas Clemson Oregon ASU

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • Texas Clemson PSU ISU

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Texas Clemson PSU ASU

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Texas SMU Oregon ISU

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Texas SMU Oregon ASU

    Votes: 6 18.8%

  • Texas SMU PSU ISU

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Texas SMU PSU ASU

    Votes: 2 6.3%

  • UGA Clemson Oregon ISU

    Votes: 4 12.5%

  • UGA Clemson Oregon ASU

    Votes: 6 18.8%

  • UGA Clemson PSU ISU

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • UGA Clemson PSU ASU

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • UGA SMU Oregon ISU

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • UGA SMU Oregon ASU

    Votes: 4 12.5%

  • UGA SMU PSU ISU

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • UGA SMU PSU ASU

    Votes: 2 6.3%
  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .
Hu War Yu said:
That's just not right, playing three times in one season? Y'all should just not go if you lose the CCG.
Click to expand...
Great idea ... you think if we asked you to fill in for us, would you do that for us?
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
All the mocks have us falling to 7 - B1G loser to 5, ND loser to 6, SEC loser to 7. If Texas loses, you could see them fall to 6 instead of 7. That would resolve that problem.

If we fall to 7, we would then play 10 - probably IU - and then 2 plays 7. You guys would likely be 2 unless PSU beats Oregon.
Click to expand...
Yup. My dunce ass fucked that up.
But I think there’s a better chance y’all fall to 10 than 7.
 
ELTEXAN said:
Yup. My dunce ass fucked that up.
But I think there’s a better chance y’all fall to 10 than 7.
Click to expand...
I don't think so ... why would we drop to 10 behind UTjr who stayed at home? The Committee better protect the conference champ losers, or there is a disincentive to play in them. They don't want that. Think about it:

- UGA SEC no. 2
- UTjr is no. 3, doesn't qualify to play in the CCG
- We beat them H2H
- By every metric, we had a better season ... better losses, better wins, H2H

If we then lose a home game and UTjr moves in front of us when we play an extra game, that's total nonsense. The Committee had better protect the losers if they really value CCG as they claim they do.
 
WhosYourDawggy said:
I don't think so ... why would we drop to 10 behind UTjr who stayed at home? The Committee better protect the conference champ losers, or there is a disincentive to play in them. They don't want that. Think about it:

- UGA SEC no. 2
- UTjr is no. 3, doesn't qualify to play in the CCG
- We beat them H2H
- By every metric, we had a better season ... better losses, better wins, H2H

If we then lose a home game and UTjr moves in front of us when we play an extra game, that's total nonsense. The Committee had better protect the losers if they really value CCG as they claim they do.
Click to expand...
Bruh. That ain’t happening.
 
ELTEXAN said:
Bruh. That ain’t happening.
Click to expand...
What ... you think we lose we drop to 10? There isn't a mock CFP that has that happening. They have made it clear they will protect the losers.

So you think you will drop to 9 or 10 when we beat you?

Here is one mock from USA Today. Loser of B1G goes to 5, ND at 6, loser of SEC at 7. When you re the loser, you would be in front of the other loser and ND because of where you are currently seeded. Do you really think yo would drop down to 8 or 9?

1733210981293.png
 
Poll gave me a headache.
 
Bump
 
Bulldawg
Clampson
SunnyDebbils
Duck
 
This reminds me of the time we knocked Ohio State out of the big ten championship game as a 6-5 unranked team playing a walk on at QB.
 
Thursday bump
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
This reminds me of the time we knocked Ohio State out of the big ten championship game as a 6-5 unranked team playing a walk on at QB.
Click to expand...
mood middle finger GIF
 
Kinda fucked up that I have to either vote for Texas, or Georgia. Obviously Texas gets my vote even though their team is only supported by the gays.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top